Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 227/2025

Case between Pathu Valiyaparambath et al vs Kunhami et al regarding property delivery and satisfaction of decree.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-11-05
Duration
Case Code No.
227
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition filed under civil procedure for property delivery and recording satisfaction. It includes multiple respondents and petitioners related to a deceased individual.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the delivery of property and recorded full satisfaction in relation to the decree. The execution petition was closed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property delivered and full satisfaction recorded.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the delivery of property and recorded full satisfaction in relation to the decree. The execution petition was closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition for property delivery was valid and satisfied the decree requirements.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition for property delivery was valid and satisfied the decree requirements.
Supporting Evidence
This petition filed under Order XXI Rule 35 and Section 50 of the code of Civil Procedure.

Judgment Evidence:

Decree Holder represented. Property delivered. Full satisfaction recorded. EP closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunhami
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Habee Thazhavadakkayil
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Illiyas
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pathu Valiyaparambath
Relation
DIED
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulaihka
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subair
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Soora
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Petition under Order XXI Rule 35 and Section 50 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Ragesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Property delivered and full satisfaction recorded.
Evidence:
Property delivered. Full satisfaction recorded. EP closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs ABDUL SALAM regarding dismissal of execution petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between NEELAM PARAMBHATH ASOKAN et al vs NEELAM PARAMBHATH CHANDRAN et al regarding Property delivery.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kavilumpara Rural Employees & Workers Welfare Co-Operative Society Ltd. vs Ammad. K. K et al regarding judgment debtor's means.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kavilumpara Vanitha Sahakarana Sangham Ltd vs Sasi et al regarding decree debt
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MUTHURAJ regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won