Similar Cases
Based on: Commercial Suit. No. 14/2025 — Case between HT & LT. Kozhikode vs Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited et al regarding settlement and dismissal.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
Commercial Suit No.8/2024
Case between Murshid Panginikkadan vs Rahul Sadasivan et al regarding a commercial dispute.
Murshid Panginikkadan and Abdul Nigash Parvesh T.T are the plaintiffs in a commercial dispute against Rahul Sadasivan and Y NOT Studios represented by Chakravarthy Ramachandran. The case was heard in the II Addl. Commercial Court of Kozhikode.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
Commercial Suit No.702/2021
Case between Moidu’s Medicate Private Limited vs Wipro GE Health Care Private Limited regarding compensation for breach of contract.
Moidu’s Medicate Private Limited, represented by its Medical Director, is suing Wipro GE Health Care Private Limited for failing to deliver and install an MRI machine within the agreed timeline. The plaintiff claims to have sustained financial losses due to this delay.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
Commercial Suit No.148/2022
Case between M/s.Eon Infrastructures and Developers Pvt. Ltd vs M/s.White Fort Constructions and Engineers Pvt. Ltd et al regarding realisation of money
M/s.Eon Infrastructures and Developers Pvt. Ltd filed a suit against M/s.White Fort Constructions and Engineers Pvt. Ltd for the recovery of arrears of license fee for a property. The defendants were set ex-parte for failing to appear in court.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.703/2021
Case between M/s. Manuelsons Hotel Pvt Ltd vs District Collector, Kozhikode & State of Kerala regarding realization of amount.
The plaintiff, M/s. Manuelsons Hotel Pvt Ltd, is suing the defendants for a balance amount of ₹2,37,811/- due for accommodation provided during the National Games. The defendants include the District Collector and the State of Kerala, who claim that they have settled the account based on actual occupancy.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
C S.595/2021
Case between M/s.Polaris Associates vs M/s.HSIL Ltd., The Branch Head, Consumer Business Office, M/s Somany Hone innovators Ltd. regarding realisation of money
M/s.Polaris Associates, represented by its proprietor Mani V, has filed a suit against M/s.HSIL Ltd. and other defendants for the realization of money due to losses incurred from defective products. The plaintiff alleges that service issues and defective products from the defendants have caused significant financial damage.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
Commercial Suit. No. 66/2022
Case between Mustafa Usman et al vs M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Limited et al regarding recovery of possession and damages for use and occupation.
The case involves plaintiffs Mustafa Usman and others suing M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Limited and another for recovery of possession of a leased property and damages for its unauthorized occupation after the lease expired. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants have not vacated the property despite legal notice.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No. 20/2023
Case between A.G.Vijayan et al vs Susheela Narayanan et al regarding realisation of money
The case involves a dispute between the plaintiffs and defendants who are close relatives regarding a partnership firm and a dishonoured cheque. The plaintiffs demand repayment of an amount due after retiring from the partnership.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
M.A(Arb). No.72/2025
Case between Manapuram Finance Ltd vs Ahammed Shamnas N A et al regarding petition under section 9 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996
Manapuram Finance Ltd has filed a petition against Ahammed Shamnas N A and Ayisha B M under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The respondents did not appear in court.
Arbitration
Dismissed
M.A(Arb). No.73/2025
Case between Manappuram Finance Ltd vs Rahim Muliyar Povval et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation
Manappuram Finance Ltd filed a petition under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 against Rahim Muliyar Povval and others. The case is about seeking arbitration-related relief.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
C.S. No. 20/2025
Case between M/s. Medimall Kunnamangalam LLP vs Dr. Sujith A.K regarding petition filed under Order 9 Rule 13, r/w section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
This case involves Dr. Sujith A.K as the petitioner/defendant and M/s. Medimall Kunnamangalam LLP as the respondent/plaintiff. The petition was filed for dismissal of a previous order due to the absence of representation.
Commercial Case
Defendant Won
M.A(Arb). No.64/2025
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited vs Jose Traders et al regarding Arbitration and conciliation
M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited filed a petition against Jose Traders and Gebi under section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The respondents were set ex parte due to their absence.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No.74/2025
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Dinu P et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation Act
Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition against Dinu P and others under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The court closed the proceedings after achieving the purpose of the application.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No.32/2025
Case between M/s.Shriram Finance Limited vs Muneer K.T et al regarding Arbitration application.
M/s.Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The case involved respondents Muneer K.T and Shamsudheen.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 70/2025
Case between M/s. Shriram Finance Limited vs Rasheed Anapparambil Kader et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation Act application.
M/s. Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act concerning certain disputes. The petitioners were represented by their advocate, while the respondents did not appear in court.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 16/2024
Case between M/s. Shriram Finance Limited vs Shafil Mohammed et al regarding Arbitration proceedings.
M/s. Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act regarding arbitration matters against Shafil Mohammed and others. The application was heard in the presence of the petitioner's advocate.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 33/2025
Case between M/s. Shriram Finance Limited vs Latha et al regarding Arbitration
M/s. Shriram Finance Limited is the petitioner seeking relief against Latha and Subeesh. The case involves an application filed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
EP. 361/2022
Case between Shriram Tansport Finance Co.Ltd vs Sameer et al regarding warrant issuance.
Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd filed a petition against Sameer and others regarding warrant issuance. The respondents did not appear, resulting in the case being dismissed for default.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 19/2024
Case between Cholmandalam Investment and Finance Co.Ltd et al vs Arjun P.R regarding Arbitration proceedings
Cholmandalam Investment and Finance Co.Ltd filed a petition against Arjun P.R under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The petitioner expressed an inability to trace the vehicle involved and failed to proceed with the matter as directed by the court.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 29/2025
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Souparnika Associates et al regarding Arbitration Application
Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act concerning a dispute with Souparnika Associates and others. The matter was settled with a joint statement filed, and the court closed the proceedings.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 23/2024
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Jis. P. Mathew et al regarding arbitration proceedings
Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition against Jis. P. Mathew and Nirmal Joy under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The case involved property attachment and proceedings.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 21/2024
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Rajesh Kumar M et al regarding arbitration proceedings.
The petitioner, Shriram Finance Limited, filed the application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act concerning arbitration proceedings against respondents Rajesh Kumar M and Rameesh Madathil. The court noted that the matter was not settled and the proceedings were subsequently closed.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 24/2025
Case between M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd vs Sajitha V et al regarding Arbitration application.
This case involves M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd as the petitioner and Sajitha V and Abdul Muneer P as respondents. The application was submitted under Section 9(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 14/2025
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Biju N et al regarding Arbitration
Shriram Finance Limited filed an application under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The respondents were set exparte and the court proceeded with the hearing.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 17/2025
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Suman E et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation act
Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act against Suman E and others. The respondents were absent and set ex-parte.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No.8/2025
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Abilash Balan et al regarding Arbitration application
Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act against Abilash Balan and others. The court dealt with the application and ultimately closed the proceedings.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
EP. 38/2025 in CS. 471/2021
Case between M/s. Nirmal Associates vs M/s. Bajaj Appliances Limited et al regarding execution petition
M/s. Nirmal Associates filed a petition under section 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure for execution against M/s. Bajaj Appliances Limited and its directors. The respondents did not enter an appearance during the hearing.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
CMA (Arbitration) No.12/2024
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Neethu K et al regarding Arbitration application
Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking relief in a dispute involving the respondents Neethu K, Sathyachandran K, and Krishnan Kutty. The court conducted a hearing on the application.
Arbitration
MA (Arbitration) No. 27/2024
Case between M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd vs Naina Laiju et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation act
M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd has filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act against Naina Laiju and Laiju M regarding arbitration proceedings. The court noted that the respondents were absent and no representation was made.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 4/2024
Case between M/s. Shriram Finance Limited vs Abdul Gafoor Chenikandiyil et al regarding Arbitration matters
The case involves M/s. Shriram Finance Limited as the petitioner and Abdul Gafoor Chenikandiyil along with others as respondents. The petition was filed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act regarding certain arbitration matters.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.69/2024
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Anjali V.P et al regarding settlement in Adalath.
The case involves Kerala Gramin Bank as the plaintiff and Anjali V.P and Prema Rajan as defendants. The matter was settled in Adalath and the suit was disposed accordingly.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No. 80/2024
Case between Cheriya Thaithottathil Subaida et al vs Mohammed Abdul Ansari regarding realisation of money
The plaintiffs, Cheriya Thaithottathil Subaida and Palakkandy Shereefa, are involved in a suit against the defendant, Mohammed Abdul Ansari, for the recovery of dues. The case revolves around the realization of arrears in license fees and damages for the use of premises.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
C.S. No. 22/2024
Case between Jalaja Prakash et al vs N.K Muhammed Riyas regarding suit dismissal for default
The plaintiffs, Jalaja Prakash, M.A Seeshan, Sheela Jahamgeer, and M.A Sajeev, pursued a suit against the defendant, N.K Muhammed Riyas. The court dismissed the suit due to the defendant not appearing.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
Commercial Suit No.161/2022
Case between M/s.Bhumi Integrated Property Management Services et al vs Dr.K.R.Sarath chandran et al regarding rejection of plaint.
M/s.Bhumi Integrated Property Management Services filed a commercial suit against Dr.K.R.Sarath chandran and Premjith Nair. The court rejected the plaint due to BCF not being paid.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
Commercial Suit No. 68/2024
Case between Mohandas vs Mahesh Balasaheb Patil regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff Mohandas sued the defendant Mahesh Balasaheb Patil for the recovery of a monetary amount. The defendant was absent during the proceedings, leading to a default judgment.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.31/2021
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Mr. Deep Chand.K.P regarding dismissal for default
Bank of Baroda filed a suit against Mr. Deep Chand.K.P. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
Commercial Suit No.54/2023
Case between Fizel Nerkattipoyil vs M/s.Brand Monk Food and Beverage Pvt. Ltd regarding dismissal for default.
Fizel Nerkattipoyil is the plaintiff represented by Suhaim Fizel. The case is against M/s.Brand Monk Food and Beverage Pvt. Ltd and its Managing Director Arunkumar regarding a commercial suit that was dismissed for default.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
Commercial Suit. No. 45/2025
Case between Canara Bank vs Sen Varkey regarding suit dismissal for default
Canara Bank filed a suit against Sen Varkey. The defendant was absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
Commercial Suit No. 18/2024
Case between The Canara Bank Thamarassery Branch vs M/s. Summer Scoop regarding realisation of money
This case involves The Canara Bank Thamarassery Branch seeking to recover a monetary amount from M/s. Summer Scoop. The defendants were called absent and set exparte.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.67/2025
Case between Shabandri Real Estate Pvt. Ltd vs I.P.Sabeesh regarding realization of money
Shabandri Real Estate Pvt. Ltd, represented by its Executive Director Muhammed Yunus Shabandri, filed a suit for realization of money against I.P.Sabeesh. The matter was settled out of court with a joint statement filed by both parties.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit. No. 06/2025
Case between Bank of India vs Hashim O.N regarding settlement of dispute through mediation.
The case involves Bank of India as the plaintiff and Hashim O.N as the defendant regarding a commercial dispute. The matter was resolved through mediation and the court decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.65/2024
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Muhammed Unais et al regarding realisation of money.
Kerala Gramin Bank is the plaintiff against Muhammed Unais and others. The case is related to the realization of a monetary amount as per the terms of a mediation settlement.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.44/2025
Case between The Canara Bank vs M/S. Bigshen Corporate Services Private Limited et al regarding suit dismissal.
The Canara Bank filed a suit against M/S. Bigshen Corporate Services Private Limited and other defendants. The suit was for final hearing but was dismissed as not pressed.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
Commercial Suit No.4/2025
Case between The Federal bank Limited vs Jinto Sebastian regarding settlement of suit
The Federal Bank Limited filed a commercial suit against Jinto Sebastian. The matter was settled during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
Commercial Suit No.24/2025
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs Mrs. Sandhya.A.V regarding settlement of the suit
The plaintiff, State Bank of India, filed a suit against the defendant, Mrs. Sandhya A.V. The matter was settled out of court, leading to a decree in terms of the joint statement.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.697/2021
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Smt. Vipina. K et al regarding settlement in special mediation.
Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against Smt. Vipina. K and others. The matter was settled in special mediation, and the court accepted the mediation agreement as legally executable.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No. 21/2025
Case between Veerankutty vs K E Abdurahiman et al regarding realisation of money.
Veerankutty is the plaintiff seeking to realise money from the defendants K E Abdurahiman and Saleena T.P. The court heard the interim application and partly allowed it.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No. 22/2025
Case between Veerankutty vs K E Imbichahamad et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
The case involves Veerankutty as the plaintiff seeking to recover money. K E Imbichahamad and Rasheeda C U are the defendants in this matter.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.300/2021
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs NADUVIL KAYALOTT OIL MILL regarding suit for realisation of amount.
The plaintiff, State Bank of India, has filed a suit against the defendant, Naduvil Kayalott Oil Mill, for the recovery of dues under various loan agreements. The defendant defaulted on loan repayments, prompting the plaintiff to seek recovery of the owed amount.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won