Case Summary
Canara Bank filed a suit against Sen Varkey. The defendant was absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sen Varkey
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. T.S Zhakaria
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Roshan Zakaria
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Sen Varkey regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Sen Varkey regarding suit dismissal for default