Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Commercial Suit No. 21/2025

Case between Veerankutty vs K E Abdurahiman et al regarding realisation of money.

Court
Commercial Court of Kozhikode
Judge
Sri.Krishnankutty.K.V
Order Date
2025-07-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Veerankutty is the plaintiff seeking to realise money from the defendants K E Abdurahiman and Saleena T.P. The court heard the interim application and partly allowed it.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was partly allowed, and the plaintiffs were instructed to present the plaint before the Civil court within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was partly allowed, and the plaintiffs were instructed to present the plaint before the Civil court within 30 days.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

I.A 4/25 heard and partly allowed. Plaint returned for presentation before Civil court within 30 days.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Veerankutty
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K E Abdurahiman
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saleena.T.P
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Muneer Ahamed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Mudasser Ahamed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.S.Rajagoapalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.James Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Plaint returned for presentation before Civil court within 30 days.
Evidence:
I.A 4/25 heard and partly allowed. Plaint returned for presentation before Civil court within 30 days.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Commercial Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Veerankutty vs K E Abdurahiman et al regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Veerankutty vs K E Abdurahiman et al regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mohandas vs Mahesh Balasaheb Patil regarding realisation of money
The Court of the Commercial Judge/ 1st Addl.Sub Judge
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s.Bhumi Integrated Property Management Services et al vs Dr.K.R.Sarath chandran et al regarding rejection of plaint.
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/ II nd ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jalaja Prakash et al vs N.K Muhammed Riyas regarding suit dismissal for default
IN THE COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/SUBORDINATE JUDGE OF KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Anjali V.P et al regarding settlement in Adalath.
THE COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/ II nd ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Cheriya Thaithottathil Subaida et al vs Mohammed Abdul Ansari regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/ 1st ADDL.SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won