Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Commercial Suit No. 22/2025

Case between Veerankutty vs K E Imbichahamad et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Court
Commercial Court of Kozhikode
Judge
Sri.Krishnankutty.K.V
Order Date
2025-07-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Veerankutty as the plaintiff seeking to recover money. K E Imbichahamad and Rasheeda C U are the defendants in this matter.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partly allowed the IA 4/25 and ordered the plaint to be returned for presentation before the Civil court within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court partly allowed the IA 4/25 and ordered the plaint to be returned for presentation before the Civil court within 30 days.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court recognized the request for relief in part.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court recognized the request for relief in part.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that the suit required further proceedings in a different jurisdiction.

Judgment Evidence:

IA 4/25 heard and partly allowed. Plaint returned for presentation before Civil court within 30 days.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Veerankutty
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K E Imbichahamad
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rasheeda C U
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Muneer Ahamed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Mudasser Ahamed
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Joy Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Suit for realisation of money.
Evidence:
IA 4/25 heard and partly allowed. Plaint returned for presentation before Civil court within 30 days.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Commercial Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Veerankutty vs K E Imbichahamad et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Veerankutty vs K E Imbichahamad et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mohandas vs Mahesh Balasaheb Patil regarding realisation of money
The Court of the Commercial Judge/ 1st Addl.Sub Judge
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s.Bhumi Integrated Property Management Services et al vs Dr.K.R.Sarath chandran et al regarding rejection of plaint.
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/ II nd ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jalaja Prakash et al vs N.K Muhammed Riyas regarding suit dismissal for default
IN THE COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/SUBORDINATE JUDGE OF KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Anjali V.P et al regarding settlement in Adalath.
THE COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/ II nd ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Cheriya Thaithottathil Subaida et al vs Mohammed Abdul Ansari regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/ 1st ADDL.SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won