Similar Cases
Based on: O.S No. 145/2017 — Case between Sajeevan vs Ratheesh et al regarding mandatory and temporary prohibitory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O.S. No. .1531/2019
Case between Jobin Thomas vs Thrikkakara Municipality et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Jobin Thomas, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Thrikkakara Municipality and Abdul Razak P.K. The case revolves around unauthorized demolition of property boundaries and potential construction disputes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1320/2016
Case between M.K.Crown vs Thrikkakara Muncipality et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiff, M.K.Crown, claims ownership of certain property and is seeking a declaration and injunction against the defendants, including Thrikkakara Muncipality, who issued directives affecting his property rights. The defendants argue that the property in question is a public pathway and seek dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S. No. 346/2024
Case between Coconut Grove Residents Association vs Maradu Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The Coconut Grove Residents Association, represented by its Secretary Dr. Stephen Puthumana, filed a suit against Maradu Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the Municipality from interfering with the private road maintained by the Association. The Municipality issued a notice demanding proof of road ownership and threatened to remove a cross bar installed to control unauthorized access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1305/2020
Case between A.S Mohanan vs Lakshmi et al regarding settlement of the suit
A.S Mohanan and Dhanalakshmi are the plaintiffs, while Lakshmi, Mani, Surendran, Latha, and Santhosh are the defendants. The case is about a suit that was settled through mediation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 725/2022
Case between Anitha Kumari K.G et al vs Unnikrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Anitha Kumari K.G and Anil Kumar K.G, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the first defendant, Unnikrishnan, related to a goat shed operating unlawfully nearby. They claim the shed has caused severe air and water pollution, affecting their health and living conditions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1265/2020
Case between Aleyamma Varghese vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding non-prosecution of suit
Aleyamma Varghese filed a suit against Thrikkakara Municipality. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 201/2018
Case between Mani P.R @ Maniappan et al vs Kalamassery Municipality et al regarding dismissal for default
The plaintiffs include Mani P.R @ Maniappan and others who filed a suit against Kalamassery Municipality and the State of Kerala. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their counsel.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 349 / 2024
Case between Mokim Ali vs Kochi Municipal Corporation regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Mokim Ali is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Kochi Municipal Corporation. The plaintiff fears illegal eviction from the property they are leasing to conduct a scrap collection business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 347/2019
Case between Sivaraman Menon vs Maradu Municipality regarding injunction for advertisement boards
The plaintiffs, Sivaraman Menon and Junaid, seek a permanent injunction against Maradu Municipality to prevent the removal of advertisement boards installed on their property. The Municipality alleges the boards are unauthorized and illegal, claiming the plaintiffs failed to comply with tax regulations.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 974/2024
Case between Rajesh V. Thomas et al vs Thrikkakara Municipality et al regarding dismissal of suit
The plaintiffs, Rajesh V. Thomas, Thomas V.V, and Daisy Thomas, filed a suit against the Thrikkakara Municipality and other government officials. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 712/2019
Case between Joseph Varghese vs Greater Cochin Development Authority et al regarding rent enhancement dispute
Joseph Varghese, a businessman, is suing the Greater Cochin Development Authority and its Executive Committee over a disputed rent increase for a leased shop. The plaintiff claims that the defendants unilaterally raised the rent in violation of the lease terms and seeks a declaration that this increase is illegal.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1463/2018
Case between Jose K.A. vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding rent enhancement and lease terms
Jose K.A. filed a suit against the Greater Cochin Development Authority challenging their unilateral increase in rent and security deposit for a leased shop. The plaintiff sought a declaration to enforce the original lease terms which limited rent increases.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 281/2025
Case between C A Shylan vs Shajan Antony @ Raphael regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
C A Shylan, the plaintiff and younger brother of the respondent, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Shajan Antony @ Raphael, who allegedly obstructed him from constructing a gate on a pathway. The case arises from a previous ruling concerning easement rights.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 180/2025
Case between Aloshious George vs Prakash P K regarding property disputes
Aloshious George, the plaintiff, is contesting against Prakash P K, alleging illegal construction and encroachment on a private pathway linked to his property. The case revolves around the defendant's actions affecting the peaceful enjoyment of the plaintiff's residence.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 881/2020
Case between Mary Raju vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding declaration and injunction
Mary Raju, the plaintiff, seeks relief against the Greater Cochin Development Authority over a dispute regarding a rental agreement. The case revolves around the defendant's unilateral increase of rent which the plaintiff contests as illegal and against the terms of their lease agreement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 118/2019
Case between Mr. M.J Mathew et al vs President, Kadavill Court Owners Association regarding declaration and consequential injunction
The plaintiffs, who are owners of an apartment called Kadavill Court, filed a suit against the president and secretary of the Kadavill Court Owners Association. The suit challenges the defendants' arbitrary rules regarding car parking for the apartment owners.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 918 / 2021
Case between Prince U Cheria et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Prince U Cheria and Lizmol K Joseph, claim to be the absolute owners of a property they purchased from T.K. Babu, which has been contested by the defendants, including the State of Kerala. The court examined the validity of the patta and the rights of ownership related to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 13 OF 2016
Case between Koonathil Pathummu Umma et al vs Thanikkatt Muhammed et al regarding injunction and compensation
Koonathil Pathummu Umma and Thanikkatt Muhammedali are plaintiffs claiming that their basement was unlawfully demolished by the defendants including the Triprangode Grama Panchayat and its Secretary. The defendants argue that the plaintiffs encroached onto public property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.509/2016
Case between K. Somasekhara Pillai vs Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, K. Somasekhara Pillai, is involved in a dispute over property rights with the defendants, including the Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram. He claims they unlawfully entered his property and cut down coconut trees, leading to a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 866/2022
Case between Mini Jolly vs Noel et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Mini Jolly, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction against her siblings, Noel, Seena Darwin, Rema Francis, and Shini Godson, regarding their shared inherited properties. The defendants allegedly leased out the properties without her consent, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.415/2021
Case between Kochuthressia Thomas vs Gopalan, Kalidasan regarding recovery of possession and injunction.
Kochuthressia Thomas is seeking recovery of possession and an injunction against Gopalan and Kalidasan due to an obstruction on a pathway. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants have blocked access to her property, which she purchased and has a right to use as per the sale deed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 234/2015
Case between Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar vs Suresh P.S, Mallika Shanmughan regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar, is involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, Suresh P.S and Mallika Shanmughan, regarding the fixation of the boundary of his property and preventing the defendants from trespassing. The case arises from allegations of encroachment and unauthorized construction by the defendants on the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1585/2019
Case between His Holiness Shrimad Raghavendra Thirtha Swami et al vs Venkatesh Shenoy et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, His Holiness Shrimad Raghavendra Thirtha Swami, the Sole Trustee of a charitable trust, sought a declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Venkatesh Shenoy and Mohan Shenoy, claiming exclusive use of a pathway. The defendants contested the plaintiff's rights, asserting their own claims to the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1329/2018
Case between G Radhakrishnan vs M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
G Radhakrishnan, the plaintiff, filed a suit against M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. and its managing director B R Ajit, along with Devi Ajit, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims ownership over a property and seeks protection against the defendants, who allegedly threatened to demolish his boundaries and trespass.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1042/2019
Case between St Mary Magdalene Church, Moothedam et al vs M J George et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, St. Mary Magdalene Church, Moothedam, seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants for trespassing on their land. The defendants argue that the plaintiff has no rights over the disputed property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 406/2018
Case between Velayudhan, Soman, Ambika et al vs Gopi O.A, Mohanan O.A et al regarding Partition
The case involves a dispute over the partition of property belonging to the deceased Kochupennu. The plaintiffs claim their rights as legal heirs, while defendants argue that Kochupennu had executed a will transferring her property to one of them.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 426/2025
Case between Viswanathan R et al vs Kousalya et al regarding boundary excavation and property support.
The petitioners, a husband and wife, are seeking an injunction against the respondents over a dispute regarding boundary excavation between their properties. They claim their property is at risk due to the respondents' actions which have allegedly removed soil without providing lateral support.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 1184/2023
Case between BCG-Golden Orchids Phase - II Association et al vs BCG-Golden Orchids Phase - I Association et al regarding construction works in common areas
The case involves petitions filed by the 1st defendant association seeking permission for repairs and construction in common areas, contested by the plaintiffs who argue the lack of urgency. The court has to decide if these works can proceed before the resolution of the pending suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 543/2022
Case between Xavier vs Joshy @ Sebastian regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Xavier and Jancy, are husband and wife seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who are the brothers of the second plaintiff. The plaintiffs claim the right to use a pathway to access their property, which the defendants allegedly attempted to obstruct.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1210/2017
Case between Purushan O K vs Soman et al regarding injunction
Purushan O K filed a suit against Soman and others seeking both mandatory and prohibitory injunctions related to a property dispute involving the demolition of a compound wall and encroachment issues. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property and seeks to prevent further damage by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 690/2018
Case between New Town Heights, Kakkanad Condominium, Owners Welfare Society vs M/s DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves the New Town Heights Owners Welfare Society seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd. and others regarding the exclusive use of an internal road within the apartment complex. The plaintiff claims that the defendants are attempting to convert the internal road into a public pathway, violating assurances made to the apartment owners.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 920/2020
Case between V.Thulaseedharan Pillai et al vs Prof. Sourier Sebastian et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiffs, owners and residents of house plots in the Divine Nagar housing colony, seek a declaration that only they have the right to use internal roads constructed in the colony. They contend that the defendants, who reside in the adjoining area, are attempting to gain access to these roads. The case involves issues around property rights and access to shared spaces.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 783/2020
Case between Joshy vs State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of title and injunction.
The plaintiff, Joshy, is seeking a declaration of title and an injunction against the defendants, including the State of Kerala and its officials, for alleged illegal eviction from his property. The case revolves around claims of continuous possession and the applicability of the Kerala Land Conservancy Act.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 177/2024
Case between Jacob Kuruvila et al vs Jhony M K et al regarding fixation of boundary.
The plaintiffs, Jacob Kuruvila and Sani Jacob, sought a judgment regarding the fixation of a boundary. The defendants, Jhony M K and Vincent M K, were involved in the case.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 544/2011
Case between St. Antony's Church, Vaduthala et al vs Paul @ Ouso Paul regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession.
The case involves St. Antony's Church seeking a declaration of title and recovery of possession of property from Paul @ Ouso Paul, who claims possession through adverse possession. The court is determining whether Paul has indeed perfected title through adverse possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 541/2020
Case between Abdul Azeez C.M et al vs D. Sajith regarding money recovery
The plaintiffs, Abdul Azeez C.M and Rani Abdul Azeez, filed a suit against the defendant, D. Sajith, for recovery of an amount due for damages and unpaid fees related to a lease agreement. The defendant denied the allegations and filed a counter claim for the return of a security deposit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 46/2009
Case between Maju P Abraham vs R.R.Antony, K.J.Joseph regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Maju P Abraham filed a suit against R.R.Antony and K.J.Joseph seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction regarding a property dispute. The case revolves around allegations of ownership and possession of land that has led to threats of forced eviction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1631/2019
Case between Mary. P.J vs Johny Diselva et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Mary. P.J is the plaintiff claiming ownership and seeking an injunction against Johny Diselva and others who she alleges have unlawfully entered her property and disturbed her possession. The defendants claim a right of way based on usage for over 50 years.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 661/2024
Case between Janeefer Mariam vs Kerala Film Producers Association regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Janeefer Mariam, alleges that the defendant, Kerala Film Producers Association, attempted to trespass on her property and obstruct her access to a pathway necessary for her property. The case revolves around a dispute regarding access rights to the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1099/2022
Case between Vincent K.A. vs Nelson @ Francis, Mini Francis regarding Partition
Vincent K.A. is seeking a partition of property that he claims is jointly owned with the defendants, who are his brother and sister. The defendants dispute his claims, stating that the property is exclusively theirs and that the plaintiff has no rights to it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1502/2019
Case between Gopalakrishnan et al vs Sreedevi et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Gopalakrishnan and Lalitha filed a suit against Sreedevi and others for a declaration of easementary rights and to restrain them from obstructing a pathway they claim to have used for over 75 years. The defendants deny the existence of such a pathway and claim that the plaintiffs have no right to it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 654/2023
Case between M/s Landmark Builders vs M/s Regional Sports Centre regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, M/s Landmark Builders, seeks a declaration that it is entitled to nominate 10 persons for the use of the defendant’s facilities for the lifetime of the firm. The defendant, M/s Regional Sports Centre, has made amendments to the membership rules limiting rights which the plaintiff claims violate the original membership agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1183/2023
Case between Jiji vs Jobi Jose et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Jiji is suing Jobi Jose and Thomas regarding the declaration of ownership of a property and to prevent them from trespassing. Jiji claims that she is the sole heir of her deceased father Thomman, as her mother has been missing for many years.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1207/2023
Case between Rajesh J D vs Suresh et al regarding partition
This case involves a partition suit concerning the property shared by siblings Late Sumathi, Late Thankappan, and Late Chellappan. The plaintiff, Rajesh J D, seeks a partition of the jointly owned property among legal heirs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 533/2010
Case between Marriamma Lukose et al vs The District Collector et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, led by Marriamma Lukose, claim ownership of a property in Ernakulam and seek a declaration and injunction against the defendants, including the District Collector, who have initiated land acquisition proceedings. They assert that the property in question has valid title and resist the defendants' claim that part of it is puramboke land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.919/2011
Case between Alice vs John regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
The plaintiffs, Alice and Lawrence, are seeking to fix the boundaries of their property and prevent the defendants, John and Mary John, from interfering with their possession. The dispute involves the validity of a pathway claimed by the defendants through the plaintiffs' property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 510/2022
Case between A.S.Nazim vs Ameena Sherif et al regarding property partition
A.S.Nazim filed a petition seeking the appointment of a receiver for property rights after not receiving her share from the estate of her deceased mother. The defendants, who are her siblings, contest her claim and assert that the property has been managed accordingly for over two decades.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 1047/2018
Case between Murali K.G et al vs Arundathi et al regarding partition and injunction
The plaintiffs, being the children of Kochayappan Gopalan, have filed a suit for partition and injunction against the defendants. The plaintiffs claim co-ownership of the property left by their deceased parents and seek their respective shares.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won