Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1265/2020

Case between Aleyamma Varghese vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding non-prosecution of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-07-03
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 07/03/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Aleyamma Varghese filed a suit against Thrikkakara Municipality. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit has been dismissed for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's failure to appear in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been dismissed for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's failure to appear in court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not present any evidence or representation in court.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not present any evidence or representation in court.
Supporting Evidence
Though today listed for evidence, plaintiff remained absent. No proof affidavit seen filed. No application also seen filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for non- prosecution. Pending IA’s closed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aleyamma Varghese
Party Age
83
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thrikkakara Municipality
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sabu P. Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manju Paul
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.N.. Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suresh Kumar K.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.A. Shereena
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for non- prosecution.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Aleyamma Varghese vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding non-prosecution of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Aleyamma Varghese vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding non-prosecution of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/03/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Municipality

Similar Cases

Case between Rajesh V. Thomas et al vs Thrikkakara Municipality et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sivaraman Menon vs Maradu Municipality regarding injunction for advertisement boards
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mani P.R @ Maniappan et al vs Kalamassery Municipality et al regarding dismissal for default
I Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between A.S Mohanan vs Lakshmi et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jobin Thomas vs Thrikkakara Municipality et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won