Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1207/2023

Case between Rajesh J D vs Suresh et al regarding partition

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-01-29
Duration
approximately-2 years 2 months
Case Closed
Wed, 01/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a partition suit concerning the property shared by siblings Late Sumathi, Late Thankappan, and Late Chellappan. The plaintiff, Rajesh J D, seeks a partition of the jointly owned property among legal heirs.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting a preliminary decree for partition of the property, with shares for each party defined.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree of partition by metes and bounds.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting a preliminary decree for partition of the property, with shares for each party defined.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff is entitled to a share based on the unchallenged evidence on record.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the plaintiff is entitled to a share based on the unchallenged evidence on record.
Supporting Evidence
On perusing plaint and documents produced, I am satisfied that the plaint claim stands proved through the unchallenged evidence on record.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed and a preliminary decree of partition is passed as given under 1) The plaint schedule property is ordered to be partitioned by metes and bounds into equal shares.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajesh J D
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jalaja
Party Age
61
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pushpa
Party Age
57
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunitha
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jalamani
Party Age
76
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Sale deed No. 964/1969 of Ernakulam SRO.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jimmy George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manoj B Menon
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled for separate possession of his share in the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled for separate possession of his share and is allowed to file application for passing of final decree.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed and a preliminary decree of partition is passed.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed and a preliminary decree of partition is passed as given under.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of sale deed No. 964/1969 of Ernakulam SRO showing joint purchase of property by the plaintiffs' predecessors.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Joint ownership dispute
Case Code
Case between Rajesh J D vs Suresh et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Rajesh J D vs Suresh et al regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 11/25/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 01/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mini Jolly vs Noel et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jobin Thomas vs Thrikkakara Municipality et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between His Holiness Shrimad Raghavendra Thirtha Swami et al vs Venkatesh Shenoy et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar vs Suresh P.S, Mallika Shanmughan regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kochuthressia Thomas vs Gopalan, Kalidasan regarding recovery of possession and injunction.
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won