Similar Cases
Based on: O.S.No.628/2014 — Case between Manoj Kumar.T.M. vs Corporation of Kochi, The Secretary, Corporation of Kochi, Antony.A.V. regarding fixation of boundary, recovery of possession and injunction both mandatory and prohibitory.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O.S No. 289/2019
Case between Prasanna Prathapan vs The Corporation of Cochin et al regarding dismissal for default.
Prasanna Prathapan is the plaintiff, while The Corporation of Cochin and The Greater Cochin Development Authority are the defendants. The case was dismissed for the plaintiff's failure to appear or be represented in court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 135/2023
Case between Padmanabhan vs George Pudumana et al regarding civil suit
The case involves Padmanabhan as the plaintiff and George Pudumana along with multiple other defendants. The suit was dismissed as withdrawn following the order in IA 11/25.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 135/2023
Case between George Pudumana et al vs Padmanabhan regarding declaration and injunction
The petitioner, Padmanabhan, seeks to withdraw a suit against the respondents, George Pudumana et al, which sought a declaration and injunction regarding a disputed pathway. The court allowed the withdrawal based on the ongoing proceedings in the High Court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 38 of 2019
Case between Rose Mary Stancy vs Corporation of Kochi et al regarding dismissal of suit
The plaintiff Rose Mary Stancy filed a suit against the Corporation of Kochi and others. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 199 /2021
Case between C.K. Bhanu et al vs Corporation of Kochi et al regarding a civil suit
C.K. Bhanu and Babu.P.R are the plaintiffs involved in a civil suit against the Corporation of Kochi and two other defendants. The case revolves around matters that fall under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
OS. No. 641/2014
Case between Rajendramany et al vs Secretary, Corporation, Kollam regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction.
The plaintiffs, Rajendramany, Jijesh.S.R., and Jithu.S.R., filed a suit against the Secretary of Kollam Corporation for encroachment and to fix property boundaries. They claimed that the Corporation attempted unauthorized construction impacting their inherited properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1 1 3 0/ 2 0 2 3
Case between Akhil Dev vs Secretary Corporation of Kochi et al regarding suit dismissal
The case involves Akhil Dev as the plaintiff against the Secretary Corporation of Kochi and others as defendants. The suit was about a civil matter but was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of intention to proceed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 234/2015
Case between Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar vs Suresh P.S, Mallika Shanmughan regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar, is involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, Suresh P.S and Mallika Shanmughan, regarding the fixation of the boundary of his property and preventing the defendants from trespassing. The case arises from allegations of encroachment and unauthorized construction by the defendants on the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 177/2024
Case between Jacob Kuruvila et al vs Jhony M K et al regarding fixation of boundary.
The plaintiffs, Jacob Kuruvila and Sani Jacob, sought a judgment regarding the fixation of a boundary. The defendants, Jhony M K and Vincent M K, were involved in the case.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 20/2022
Case between David Pul vs State of Kerala et al regarding re-fixing of boundary of property and permanent prohibitory injunction
David Pul has filed a suit against the State of Kerala and various government officials regarding the resurvey of his property boundaries, alleging that the resurvey was conducted improperly and that his property boundaries were incorrectly fixed. The defendants contend that the resurvey was executed correctly in accordance with the law.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 330/2025
Case between T F George vs CSML (Cochin Smart Mission Ltd.) et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
T F George, a senior citizen and co-owner of land, filed a petition against CSML and Kochi Municipal Corporation seeking a temporary prohibitory injunction to prevent encroachments on his property during a beautification project. The case involves issues of boundary demarcation and the rights of property owners.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 649/2014
Case between Lohidakshan vs Velappan et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
Lohidakshan is the plaintiff seeking a boundary fixation and injunction against his brother Velappan and his family. The case involves allegations of attempted encroachment on the plaintiff's property and a counterclaim by the defendants for a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 656/2011
Case between Cicily vs The Administrator, M/s Chinamaya Vidyalaya et al regarding fixation of boundary.
The plaintiff, Cicily, is seeking a decree for the fixation of the boundary of her property, which she claims has been obstructed by the defendants. The defendants, including M/s Chinamaya Vidyalaya and others, contest the ownership and possession of the plaintiff over the property in question.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 209/2019
Case between Sudhi vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Sudhi, the plaintiff, is seeking to establish his ownership and prevent the defendants from encroaching on his property. The defendants include various government officials who have allegedly threatened to demolish part of his property, claiming it is part of government land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 210/2019
Case between Nitha Shaji et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves plaintiffs Nitha Shaji, her minor children Meenakshi and Krishnananda, who claim ownership of a property in Nadama Village. They sought an injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with their possession of the property, which they allege is being wrongly claimed by the government.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 262/2019
Case between Suresh Babu vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Suresh Babu and Lakshmi, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the State of Kerala and other governmental defendants. The case involves a dispute over property boundaries following a resurvey, with the plaintiffs arguing that their property has been incorrectly categorized as land belonging to the government.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1099/2019
Case between Antony Varghese vs P.C. Jose regarding fixation of boundary and consequential injunction.
The plaintiffs, Antony Varghese and Aney Antony, are seeking a decree for the fixation of boundaries concerning their joint owned property. The defendant, P.C. Jose, is accused of illegally claiming more land than he actually owns.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No. 743 /2024
Case between Anitha James vs Park View Apartment Owners Welfare Association et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Anitha James has filed a petition against the Park View Apartment Owners Welfare Association and its office bearers for causing obstruction in her renovation works at her apartment. The court is examining if the defendants have the right to prevent her from using common areas during her renovation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.659/2023
Case between Abdul Latheef. E. P vs K. Sivaraj et al regarding declaration and injunction
The case involves Abdul Latheef. E. P as the plaintiff and K. Sivaraj and K. Praveenraj as defendants. The plaintiff is seeking a declaration that a partnership with the defendants has been dissolved and is also requesting for an injunction against them.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.279/2017
Case between Antony vs Shibu et al regarding Declaration, boundary fixation, and injunction
The suit involves siblings Antony and Shibu disputing the boundary of their inherited property, leading to unlawful encroachment by Shibu which Antony seeks to remedy.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 866/2022
Case between Mini Jolly vs Noel et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Mini Jolly, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction against her siblings, Noel, Seena Darwin, Rema Francis, and Shini Godson, regarding their shared inherited properties. The defendants allegedly leased out the properties without her consent, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.415/2021
Case between Kochuthressia Thomas vs Gopalan, Kalidasan regarding recovery of possession and injunction.
Kochuthressia Thomas is seeking recovery of possession and an injunction against Gopalan and Kalidasan due to an obstruction on a pathway. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants have blocked access to her property, which she purchased and has a right to use as per the sale deed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1585/2019
Case between His Holiness Shrimad Raghavendra Thirtha Swami et al vs Venkatesh Shenoy et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, His Holiness Shrimad Raghavendra Thirtha Swami, the Sole Trustee of a charitable trust, sought a declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Venkatesh Shenoy and Mohan Shenoy, claiming exclusive use of a pathway. The defendants contested the plaintiff's rights, asserting their own claims to the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. .1531/2019
Case between Jobin Thomas vs Thrikkakara Municipality et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Jobin Thomas, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Thrikkakara Municipality and Abdul Razak P.K. The case revolves around unauthorized demolition of property boundaries and potential construction disputes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1329/2018
Case between G Radhakrishnan vs M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
G Radhakrishnan, the plaintiff, filed a suit against M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. and its managing director B R Ajit, along with Devi Ajit, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims ownership over a property and seeks protection against the defendants, who allegedly threatened to demolish his boundaries and trespass.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1042/2019
Case between St Mary Magdalene Church, Moothedam et al vs M J George et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, St. Mary Magdalene Church, Moothedam, seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants for trespassing on their land. The defendants argue that the plaintiff has no rights over the disputed property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 406/2018
Case between Velayudhan, Soman, Ambika et al vs Gopi O.A, Mohanan O.A et al regarding Partition
The case involves a dispute over the partition of property belonging to the deceased Kochupennu. The plaintiffs claim their rights as legal heirs, while defendants argue that Kochupennu had executed a will transferring her property to one of them.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 426/2025
Case between Viswanathan R et al vs Kousalya et al regarding boundary excavation and property support.
The petitioners, a husband and wife, are seeking an injunction against the respondents over a dispute regarding boundary excavation between their properties. They claim their property is at risk due to the respondents' actions which have allegedly removed soil without providing lateral support.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 1184/2023
Case between BCG-Golden Orchids Phase - II Association et al vs BCG-Golden Orchids Phase - I Association et al regarding construction works in common areas
The case involves petitions filed by the 1st defendant association seeking permission for repairs and construction in common areas, contested by the plaintiffs who argue the lack of urgency. The court has to decide if these works can proceed before the resolution of the pending suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 712/2019
Case between Joseph Varghese vs Greater Cochin Development Authority et al regarding rent enhancement dispute
Joseph Varghese, a businessman, is suing the Greater Cochin Development Authority and its Executive Committee over a disputed rent increase for a leased shop. The plaintiff claims that the defendants unilaterally raised the rent in violation of the lease terms and seeks a declaration that this increase is illegal.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 543/2022
Case between Xavier vs Joshy @ Sebastian regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Xavier and Jancy, are husband and wife seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who are the brothers of the second plaintiff. The plaintiffs claim the right to use a pathway to access their property, which the defendants allegedly attempted to obstruct.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1210/2017
Case between Purushan O K vs Soman et al regarding injunction
Purushan O K filed a suit against Soman and others seeking both mandatory and prohibitory injunctions related to a property dispute involving the demolition of a compound wall and encroachment issues. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property and seeks to prevent further damage by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 690/2018
Case between New Town Heights, Kakkanad Condominium, Owners Welfare Society vs M/s DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves the New Town Heights Owners Welfare Society seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd. and others regarding the exclusive use of an internal road within the apartment complex. The plaintiff claims that the defendants are attempting to convert the internal road into a public pathway, violating assurances made to the apartment owners.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1463/2018
Case between Jose K.A. vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding rent enhancement and lease terms
Jose K.A. filed a suit against the Greater Cochin Development Authority challenging their unilateral increase in rent and security deposit for a leased shop. The plaintiff sought a declaration to enforce the original lease terms which limited rent increases.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 920/2020
Case between V.Thulaseedharan Pillai et al vs Prof. Sourier Sebastian et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiffs, owners and residents of house plots in the Divine Nagar housing colony, seek a declaration that only they have the right to use internal roads constructed in the colony. They contend that the defendants, who reside in the adjoining area, are attempting to gain access to these roads. The case involves issues around property rights and access to shared spaces.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 783/2020
Case between Joshy vs State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of title and injunction.
The plaintiff, Joshy, is seeking a declaration of title and an injunction against the defendants, including the State of Kerala and its officials, for alleged illegal eviction from his property. The case revolves around claims of continuous possession and the applicability of the Kerala Land Conservancy Act.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 544/2011
Case between St. Antony's Church, Vaduthala et al vs Paul @ Ouso Paul regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession.
The case involves St. Antony's Church seeking a declaration of title and recovery of possession of property from Paul @ Ouso Paul, who claims possession through adverse possession. The court is determining whether Paul has indeed perfected title through adverse possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 541/2020
Case between Abdul Azeez C.M et al vs D. Sajith regarding money recovery
The plaintiffs, Abdul Azeez C.M and Rani Abdul Azeez, filed a suit against the defendant, D. Sajith, for recovery of an amount due for damages and unpaid fees related to a lease agreement. The defendant denied the allegations and filed a counter claim for the return of a security deposit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 46/2009
Case between Maju P Abraham vs R.R.Antony, K.J.Joseph regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Maju P Abraham filed a suit against R.R.Antony and K.J.Joseph seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction regarding a property dispute. The case revolves around allegations of ownership and possession of land that has led to threats of forced eviction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1631/2019
Case between Mary. P.J vs Johny Diselva et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Mary. P.J is the plaintiff claiming ownership and seeking an injunction against Johny Diselva and others who she alleges have unlawfully entered her property and disturbed her possession. The defendants claim a right of way based on usage for over 50 years.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 661/2024
Case between Janeefer Mariam vs Kerala Film Producers Association regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Janeefer Mariam, alleges that the defendant, Kerala Film Producers Association, attempted to trespass on her property and obstruct her access to a pathway necessary for her property. The case revolves around a dispute regarding access rights to the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1099/2022
Case between Vincent K.A. vs Nelson @ Francis, Mini Francis regarding Partition
Vincent K.A. is seeking a partition of property that he claims is jointly owned with the defendants, who are his brother and sister. The defendants dispute his claims, stating that the property is exclusively theirs and that the plaintiff has no rights to it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1502/2019
Case between Gopalakrishnan et al vs Sreedevi et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Gopalakrishnan and Lalitha filed a suit against Sreedevi and others for a declaration of easementary rights and to restrain them from obstructing a pathway they claim to have used for over 75 years. The defendants deny the existence of such a pathway and claim that the plaintiffs have no right to it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 159/2018
Case between T. K. Lalu vs State of Kerala et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunctive relief
The plaintiff, T. K. Lalu, is seeking to fix the boundary between his property and that of the defendants, who include the State of Kerala and others. The case revolves around allegations of inaccuracies in property boundaries established in a resurvey.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.410/2015
Case between Jose vs Kochumon @ Santhosh et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Jose, the plaintiff, claims ownership of a property he received through a settlement deed and seeks relief against Kochumon @ Santhosh and others for boundary fixation and injunction to prevent trespassing. The defendants contend that there is already an existing boundary and allege that the plaintiff has encroached on their land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 654/2023
Case between M/s Landmark Builders vs M/s Regional Sports Centre regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, M/s Landmark Builders, seeks a declaration that it is entitled to nominate 10 persons for the use of the defendant’s facilities for the lifetime of the firm. The defendant, M/s Regional Sports Centre, has made amendments to the membership rules limiting rights which the plaintiff claims violate the original membership agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1183/2023
Case between Jiji vs Jobi Jose et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Jiji is suing Jobi Jose and Thomas regarding the declaration of ownership of a property and to prevent them from trespassing. Jiji claims that she is the sole heir of her deceased father Thomman, as her mother has been missing for many years.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1207/2023
Case between Rajesh J D vs Suresh et al regarding partition
This case involves a partition suit concerning the property shared by siblings Late Sumathi, Late Thankappan, and Late Chellappan. The plaintiff, Rajesh J D, seeks a partition of the jointly owned property among legal heirs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won