Similar Cases
Based on: O.S. No. 64/2024 — Case between Shivan M.V vs M. V Sarojini regarding injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O.S No. 28/2023
Case between M/s. Gambier International Private Limited vs Darley Peethambaran et al regarding injunction
The plaintiff, M/s. Gambier International Private Limited, is seeking an injunction to prevent the defendants from forcefully evicting them from the rented property. The defendants have entered appearance but filed written statements denying the allegations.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No. 762 /2024
Case between Park View Apartment Owners Welfare Association et al vs Anita James, Corporation of Cochin regarding temporary injunction.
The Park View Apartment Owners Welfare Association and its Treasurer are seeking a temporary injunction against Anita James and the Corporation of Cochin. They allege that Anita James has been unlawfully altering the common areas of their apartment building.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 282/2025
Case between Muhsina P S vs Nizar V H regarding temporary injunction
Muhsina P S filed for a temporary injunction against Nizar V H regarding the business CMAS World Wide which she claims to own. The defendant is allegedly retaining possession of the business while failing to pay the agreed amount.
Injunction
Defendant Won
O.S. No.275/2025
Case between Krishnamritha V vs Chairperson, College Union et al regarding publication of competition result.
The petitioner, Krishnamritha V, a student, seeks a court order to publish her result for the Kathakali competition in MG University Kalotsavam 2024-25. The petition was filed after she participated in the competition based on a previous injunction.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 660 /20 25
Case between Greenal Joseph vs Century Club regarding attachment before judgment
Greenal Joseph, the plaintiff, seeks a pre-judgment attachment of a fixed deposit held by Century Club. He claims that the Club misled him regarding membership fees and that there are internal disputes affecting his membership status.
Injunction
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 77 OF 2015
Case between Pottammal Vakayil deceased Mammali Haji's children et al vs Enudheen @ Bava et al regarding Injunction
Case involves the plaintiffs, being children of Pottammal Vakayil, filing an injunction against the defendants. Defendants include various individuals related to Pottammal Vakayil through different family relations.
Injunction
Defendant Won
OS No. 87 / 2024
Case between Deepa S Vijayan vs Sundaram Finance Ltd et al regarding ad-interim injunction.
Deepa S Vijayan is seeking an ad-interim injunction against Sundaram Finance Ltd and others. The court granted the injunction to prevent the defendants from further actions regarding the vehicle mentioned in the plaint.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.237/2025
Case between Lini Mathew, Basil Mathew vs Joy regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Petitioners Lini Mathew and Basil Mathew sought an injunction to protect the boundary ridge of their property from destruction. Respondent Joy argued that the tractor movement was necessary for agricultural purposes and the ridge shouldn't be protected.
Injunction
OS No. 976/2024
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Benny John and Reena, sought a temporary injunction against the defendant, Anivrithan, to prevent him from selling a property involved in a disputed sale agreement. The defendant contested the allegations, claiming no such agreement existed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.856/2018
Case between Jayan. K.S et al vs M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Jayan. K.S and Jayakumari Jayan, are a husband and wife facing threats from the defendants, M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd and its officers, regarding a loan for a truck. They seek a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from entering their rented house and making threats related to the loan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1549/2019
Case between Sasi vs Chokli et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Sasi and Soumini, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Chokli, who attempted to obstruct their access to a pathway critical for their property. The case was brought due to concerns over the defendant's attempts to encroach on the pathway, impacting the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of their land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 76/2025
Case between Muhammed Rija P.M vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Muhammed Rija P.M filed a suit against Thrikkakara Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction after the municipality removed a business signboard without proper notice. The court found that while the municipality could not act without due process, it could not impose a blanket prohibition on the municipality's actions.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S. No. 292/2025
Case between Samson T George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction
This case involves petitioners Samson T George and Babu Mathew seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents Arun Kumar Karerat, Samson Fernandez, Annerine Mildred D’Silva, and MIR Realtors Pvt. Ltd. The petitioners argue that failure to grant the injunction will cause them irreparable harm.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1125/2024
Case between Leena Sham vs M/s Google L L C et al regarding a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Leena Sham has filed a suit against YouTube and her daughter, Sharikka Sham, seeking a permanent injunction to remove a video uploaded by her deceased son. The video is claimed to violate her privacy and has caused distress to the family after the son's death.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 626 /2022
Case between Aseeb vs Nahas et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Aseeb, a senior citizen, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing his access to a pathway that he claims is essential for ingress and egress to his property. The defendants, relatives of the plaintiff, contest the existence of the claimed pathway and the plaintiff's rights over it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 995 / 2019
Case between Suresh Babu T vs Kiran M B et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Suresh Babu T, filed a suit against Kiran M B and Grace Cheriyan for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent his forcible eviction from a leased property. The plaintiff claims he invested significantly in his business and fears illegal dispossession by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 571 / 2020
Case between M/s Sinergia Media Labs LLP vs M/s Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, M/s Sinergia Media Labs LLP, filed a suit against the defendant, M/s Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd, seeking protection against eviction and service disruption. The case revolves around alleged non-payment of rent during the COVID-19 pandemic and the plaintiff's apprehension of unlawful eviction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 244 / 2023
Case between M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd. et al vs Jayesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and others, are seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants, who are members of the Youth Wing of 'Lok Tantric Janata Dal', for obstructing access to the plaintiffs' development project in Ernakulam. The defendants staged protests claiming illegal activities by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 563/2025
Case between Jisha Mathew vs Jasar M K et al regarding temporary injunction.
Jisha Mathew, acting as the authorized agent of Mr. Ranjith Krishnan, filed a petition for temporary injunction against Jasar M K and Anas M A, who are alleged to have dumped waste on the property owned by Mr. Ranjith. The defendants denied the allegations and claimed ownership rights over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 436 of 2022
Case between K.J Thomas et al vs Saumya Maju et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
K.J Thomas and others are plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Saumya Maju and others. The case concerns excavation activities by the defendants that threaten the plaintiffs' properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 545/2024
Case between Soni Francis et al vs Pioneer Nirman India Pvt. (Ltd) et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Soni Francis and Lizzy Francis, claim their right to an exclusive car parking facility in a property owned by them in Pioneer Towers. They have been denied this right by the defendants, who are involved in managing the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 662/2025
Case between Shinod A.J vs The Branch Manager, M/s Sundaram Finance Limited regarding permanent prohibitor injunction
Shinod A.J filed a petition for a permanent prohibitor injunction to prevent the defendants from taking physical possession of a vehicle he owns, financed by them. The defendants claim the plaintiff has defaulted on the loan agreement and can take possession as per the arbitration provisions.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 208/2025
Case between Salma John Pol @ Salma Thampi et al vs Maglin Thimothiyos et al regarding injunction
The plaintiff, Salma John Pol, filed for an injunction against the defendants, which include a cooperative bank and individuals. The case involved a legal challenge under the Code of Civil Procedure.
Injunction
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 5 41/2019
Case between Varghese P Itoop vs Alliance residency owner's association et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Varghese P Itoop, is the owner of two commercial shop rooms and is involved in a dispute with the Alliance residency owner's association regarding the unauthorized removal of hoardings placed on his property. The association contends that the plaintiff violated their bye-laws, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 506/2025
Case between Girish K. R. vs Thomas J. Vayalatt et al regarding injunction
The plaintiff, Girish K. R., seeks an injunction against the defendants to prevent his eviction from a property he claims to have rented. The defendants, including State Bank of India officials, assert that the suit is barred under the SARFAESI Act and challenge the plaintiff's tenancy.
Injunction
Defendant Won
O.S No . 74/2025
Case between Dr. Saju Joseph vs Ramlu Alias Ramla et al regarding injunction
Dr. Saju Joseph is the plaintiff who has ownership and possession over the property in question. The defendants are accused of constructing an illegal shed obstructing access to the property.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
IA No. 1 / 2025
Case between Geetha Surendran W/o Surendran vs Kuriakose @ Kuriachan S/o Paulose regarding boundary dispute and injunction relief
Geetha Surendran seeks court intervention to prevent encroachment and construction on her property by Kuriakose @ Kuriachan.
Civil
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 13/2018
Case between M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. vs V.J. Joy et al regarding perpetual injunction
M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. seeks a perpetual injunction against V.J. Joy and others to prevent them from obstructing the operation of the bone meal unit. The defendants claim that the operation is illegal, causing environmental pollution and health risks to nearby residents.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 138/2022
Case between M.R. Gopinadhan Nair vs Secretary Perumbavoor Municipality regarding perpetual injunction and mandatory injunction
The case involves M.R. Gopinadhan Nair as the plaintiff, who is asking for a perpetual and mandatory injunction against the Secretary of the Perumbavoor Municipality and others regarding unauthorized constructions. The plaintiff claims that the defendants have violated building rules and encroached on his property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
I.A No. 2/2025
Case between Jolly Paul vs Poulose regarding being temporarily restrained from cutting rubber trees or trespassing
Case between Jolly Paul vs Poulose regarding temporary injunction to prevent damage to rubber trees and properties.
Injunction
OS No. 75 / 2025
Case between Peter P Paul vs Paul Kuriako et al regarding injunction
This case involves a request for an ad-interim injunction to prevent demolition or narrowing of a way and obstruction of transportation.
Injunction
OS No. 31 / 2021
Case between Paulose K.V, Sara vs Sarojini Kodiyan regarding Injunction
This is a suit for an injunction. The plaintiffs are the absolute owners and are in possession and enjoyment of 3.8 Ares of land in Resurvey No.311/17 (Old Survey No.194/2) in Block No.42 of Thiruvaniyoor Village.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 255 OF 2015
Case between Muhammed vs Kulathur desom regarding injunction
Case between Muhammed and others vs Ummuyya and others. Suit for injunction. Plaintiff absent, suit dismissed for default.
Injunction
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 164 OF 2017
Case between Alavikutty et al vs Ummer et al regarding injunction
Injunction suit involving Alavikutty and Abdul Rasheed against Ummer and Muhammed Shameer.
Injunction
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 102 OF 2015
Case between Kadeeja et al vs Usmankutty.K.P et al regarding injunction
In this case, Kadeeja and Sabira filed a suit for injunction against Usmankutty.K.P and Abdul Razakh. The suit was dismissed for default.
Injunction
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 259 OF 2019
Case between Ismail P. vs Muhammed P regarding Injunction
Case between Ismail P. and Muhammed P., brothers, about a property dispute involving a house where defendant residing after plaintiff withdrew permission.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
E.P. No. 128/2025
Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
The Managing Director of Channel Foods Pvt Ltd filed a petition for the execution of a decree against Kotak Mahindra General Insurance. The court reported the matter settled and dismissed the execution petition.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
O.S No. 136/2018
Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
Garden View Apartment owners Association filed a restoration petition after their suit was dismissed for default when they failed to appear for trial. The court considered the circumstances and allowed the restoration subject to a cost being paid.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
R.C.P. No.185/2022
Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
N.X. Joseph Jason filed a petition against Noble George for eviction from a rented building due to non-payment of rent and requested for the fixation of fair rent. The petitioner claims the respondent defaulted on rent payments and needs the premises for his own business.
Rent Control Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 866/2022
Case between Mini Jolly vs Noel et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Mini Jolly, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction against her siblings, Noel, Seena Darwin, Rema Francis, and Shini Godson, regarding their shared inherited properties. The defendants allegedly leased out the properties without her consent, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 954/2024
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
Mrs. Julie Sebastian filed a suit against SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. The matter was reported settled, and both parties agreed to the terms of mediation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 913/2022
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
The case involves M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. as the plaintiff and Kalamassery Municipality as the defendant. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.P No. 7394/2021
Case between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Manager, DTDC Express Limited et al regarding decree satisfaction
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. is the decree holder, while the judgment debtors include the Manager of DTDC Express Limited and the company itself. The case involves the satisfaction of a decree.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1240/2024
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
The case involves M/s Indo Quartz as the plaintiff and M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and others as defendants. The plaintiff filed a petition under Order 38 Rule 5, claiming that the defendants intended to withdraw funds to defeat a potential decree against them.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.892/2021
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Shanoj R, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Joseph Augustin and Lenin Joseph, to prevent them from destroying a sacred serpent grove. The defendants had been allegedly trespassing and causing damage to the grove, which has been in existence for over 1000 years.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.415/2021
Case between Kochuthressia Thomas vs Gopalan, Kalidasan regarding recovery of possession and injunction.
Kochuthressia Thomas is seeking recovery of possession and an injunction against Gopalan and Kalidasan due to an obstruction on a pathway. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants have blocked access to her property, which she purchased and has a right to use as per the sale deed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 30/2023
Case between Louis Anthony vs Nebu @ Chackochan regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.
Louis Anthony, the plaintiff, is seeking a legal remedy for the fixation of boundary and an injunction against the defendant, Nebu @ Chackochan, who is allegedly trying to trespass into the plaintiff's property. The case has raised issues related to property valuation and the right of the plaintiff over the concerned property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 367/2018
Case between Manoharan vs Ramadas regarding mandatory injunction to vacate property
The plaintiff, Manoharan, and the defendant, Ramadas, are brothers involved in a dispute over the ownership and possession of a property in Kadamakkudy Village. The plaintiff seeks a mandatory injunction to vacate the property, claiming that the defendant, who was allowed to reside in a shed on the property, has overstayed and caused disturbances.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won