Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No.185/2022

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-12
Duration
approximately-4 years 4 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

N.X. Joseph Jason filed a petition against Noble George for eviction from a rented building due to non-payment of rent and requested for the fixation of fair rent. The petitioner claims the respondent defaulted on rent payments and needs the premises for his own business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition, directing the respondent to vacate the premises within 30 days and fixed the fair rent at Rs.30 per sq.ft.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction from the premises and fixation of fair rent at Rs.30 per sq.ft.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition, directing the respondent to vacate the premises within 30 days and fixed the fair rent at Rs.30 per sq.ft.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved his case of necessary occupancy for business and established non-payment of rent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Having considered the unchallenged oral testimony of PW1 and documentary evidence of Exts.A1 to A4, the petitioner has proved his case and therefore, he is entitled to get an order, as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed. The following orders are issued. 1. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today under Section 11((2)(b) of the Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N.X. Joseph Jason
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Noble George
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original property tax, Original rent Agreement, True copy of lawyer Notice, Original postal acknowledgment.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saji P. Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.C. Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mini G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Seena A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saju K.T.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thankarajan P.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An order was made for eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today under Section 11((2)(b) of the Act.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The order for the respondent to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(3) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Fair Rent
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Fixation of fair rent for the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The fair rent of the petition schedule building is fixed Rs.30/(Rupees Thirty) per sq.ft from the date of the petition.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Property Tax
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the petitioner is paying the property tax in respect of the petition schedule building.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the petitioner entered into a rent agreement with the respondent and the lease has come into effect from September, 2016.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a true copy of the lawyer notice sent to the respondent demanding payment of arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as evidence that the respondent received the notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
Case Code Year
Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 09/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between David Paul vs M/s LWC Events LLP et al regarding rent control proceedings
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Jojo Paul vs Maya Prasanth regarding eviction for non-payment of rent
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. K. O. Joseph et al vs Mr. Abdul Sathar regarding non-compliance of rent order
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Rhine Biogenics (P) Ltd vs Century Associates regarding eviction and rent arrears
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandathil Mathew Oommen vs Eljove C. Chummar regarding compliance with rent arrears.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won