Case Summary
Mr. K. O. Joseph and Mrs. Mary filed a petition against Mr. Abdul Sathar for non-compliance with a rent control order. The court found the respondent had failed to comply with the previous orders.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to comply with the previous rent order. As the respondent failed to do so, the court directed the respondent to vacate the premises.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding payment of rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding payment of rent arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding payment of rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding payment of rent arrears.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent did not comply with the order or shown any sufficient cause for non-compliance.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mr. K. O. Joseph
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o late Poulose
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mrs. Mary
- Party Age
- 83
- Relation
- W/o. late Joseph
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Abdul Sathar
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o. Moideen
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit of non-compliance of the order by the respondent
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.R. Syamkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Indrajith Dilip
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S. Suneethi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nidhin Raj Vettikkadan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anjala Nazrin Subair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anjo Francis
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Keerthana Rajeev
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Mr. K. O. Joseph et al vs Mr. Abdul Sathar regarding non-compliance of rent order
Case Code Year
Case between Mr. K. O. Joseph et al vs Mr. Abdul Sathar regarding non-compliance of rent order