Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 152/2024

Case between Mr. K. O. Joseph et al vs Mr. Abdul Sathar regarding non-compliance of rent order

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-06-02
Duration
null

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mr. K. O. Joseph and Mrs. Mary filed a petition against Mr. Abdul Sathar for non-compliance with a rent control order. The court found the respondent had failed to comply with the previous orders.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the respondent to comply with the previous rent order. As the respondent failed to do so, the court directed the respondent to vacate the premises.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding payment of rent arrears.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mr. K. O. Joseph (62 years) Koomullil House, Thammanam P.O., Edappally South village, Ernakulam-682 032 Mrs. Mary (83 years) Koomullil House, Thammanam P.O., Edappally South village, Ernakulam-682 032

Defendants

Mr. Abdul Sathar (53 years) Pallikkal House. Mombana Muri, Arookutty village, Arookutty P.O., Alappuzha-688535

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases