Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 112/2024

Case between Jojo Paul vs Maya Prasanth regarding eviction for non-payment of rent

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-08-01
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jojo Paul, the landlord, filed a petition against Maya Prasanth, the tenant, seeking eviction due to non-payment of rent. The tenant defaulted on rent payments since January 2023, leading to accumulated arrears.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction, directing the tenant to vacate the premises within 30 days. The landlord was also granted the costs of the petition.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of tenant from the shop room
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established the claim of unpaid rent and failure to occupy the premises.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(4)(v) of the Act as follows: 1. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jojo Paul (62 years years) Palathinkal House, Poonithura Village, Poonithura P.O., Ernakulam District

Defendants

Maya Prasanth (Age not specified years) Raji Bhavan, Palliyil Lane, Jayanthi Road, Maradu P.O., Pin -682304

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to vacate the premises and hand over possession to the petitioner.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(4)(v) of the Act as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to recover the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Support for the claim of rent arrears and eviction.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of delivery of the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Testimony of the petitioner established the claim.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases