Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT No. 321 OF 2019 — Case between Archana K. vs The State of Kerala et al regarding Suit for mandatory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
Original Suit No. 35 of 2017
Case between Krishana. M. Jayesh vs Kerala state et al regarding Suit for injunction
The case involves Krishana. M. Jayesh, a minor represented by her mother, who filed a suit against the Kerala state and others for injunction. The plaintiff did not press the suit, leading to its dismissal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 350 OF 2011
Case between Cheenikkal Abdul Nazer vs The Passport Officer et al regarding declaration
Plaintiff Abdul Nazer filed a suit seeking declaration, but the court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff failed to produce necessary documents.
Civil Suit - Declaration
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 149 OF 2014
Case between Mohamed Moideen vs Passport Officer et al regarding date of birth in passport
Mohamed Moideen filed a suit seeking a declaration that his actual date of birth is 22/05/1972 due to a clerical error in his passport, which showed a wrong date causing early retirement implications.
Civil Suit - Declaration
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 293 OF 2014
Case between Abdul Rasheed vs Passport Officer, Union of India regarding declaration of date of birth
Abdul Rasheed filed a suit seeking a declaration that his actual date of birth is 01/09/1977, due to an error in his passport showing his date of birth as 10/11/1973.
Civil Suit - Declaration
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 127 OF 2014
Case between Abdul Sammad Kuttippulakkal vs The Passport Officer et al regarding declaration of correct date of birth
Abdul Sammad Kuttippulakkal, an Indian citizen, filed a suit seeking a declaration that his actual date of birth is 20-05-1969 and his name is ABDUSAMAD, correcting the mistakes in his passport.
Civil Suit - Declaration
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Pt 2499/2014
Case between Avarankal Raheem vs Government of Kerala et al regarding petition
Petition allowed with condition to pay cost to respondent.
Civil Petition
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 292 of 2014
Case between Abdul Kader vs Passport Officer et al regarding declaration
Abdul Kader, the plaintiff, filed a suit seeking a declaration. The court dismissed the suit for default due to non-payment of batta for issuing summons to the defendants.
Civil Suit - Declaration
Defendant Won
19 CF 2014
Case between Gasheer vs Passport Officer et al regarding correction of date of birth
The plaintiff filed a case seeking a declaration of his correct date of birth as 21.5.1972, which was different from the date shown on his passport due to a clerical error.
Civil Suit - Declaration
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 354 of 2014
Case between Abdul Razak Pacheri vs Passport Officer et al regarding declaration
Abdul Razak Pacheri, the plaintiff, filed a suit seeking a declaration. However, the suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff failed to pay the necessary fees to summon the 2nd defendant.
Civil Suit - Declaration
Defendant Won
Restor.Pt 503/2016
Case between Maniparambil Sarada vs State of Kerala et al regarding petition dismissal
Petitioner Sarada filed a petition against State of Kerala and others. The petition was allowed on the condition of paying costs, which were not paid, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Civil Case
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 26 OF 2017
Case between Muhammed Shanvar Babu.M.K et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding Injunction
Muhammed Shanvar Babu.M.K, a minor, represented by Yoosaf Mancheri, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants regarding an injunction. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Injunction
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO.27 OF 2017
Case between Liyana Khalid. V vs State of Kerala et al regarding Injunction
Liyana Khalid. V filed a suit for an injunction against the State of Kerala and other parties. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Injunction
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO.32 OF 2017
Case between Reshma.P. et al vs The State of Kerala et al regarding declaration
A minor plaintiff represented by her mother filed a suit for declaration, which was dismissed for default due to non-payment of batta.
Civil Suit - Declaration
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.203 OF 2006
Case between Pathummu et al vs Varikkodath Eni et al regarding injunction
Plaintiffs filed suit seeking injunction, but the suit was dismissed as plaintiffs were absent and had no representation.
Civil Suit - Injunction
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.354 OF 2017
Case between Suyesha et al vs General Convenor et al regarding suit for declaration
Multiple minors represented by their parents and next friends filed a suit for declaration, but the case was dismissed as the counsel for the plaintiffs had no instructions and the plaintiffs were absent during the final hearing.
Civil Suit - Declaration
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL PETITION (ELECTION) NO.80 OF 2015
Case between Vasu.K.P vs Viswanathan.K.P et al regarding Panchayat Election irregularities
Vasu.K.P filed a petition challenging the election result of Ward No.IV in Mannathuparamba due to improper reception of invalid votes. The case involved voters being excluded and added in different wards resulting in a tie between Vasu.K.P and Viswanathan.K.P.
Original Petition (Election)
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 6/2015
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Vipin Mohan C. regarding execution of decree
Kerala Gramin Bank filed an execution petition to recover a debt from Vipin Mohan C., a government employee, by attaching his salary.
Civil Execution - Decree Execution
Original Suit No. 131 OF 2019
Case between Kadeeja vs Saidalavi et al regarding Suit for partition
Case involves Kadeeja suing Saidalavi, Fathima, and Nafeesa for partition of property.
Partition Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 316 OF 2019
Case between Vismaya.M., Sindhu vs The State of Kerala et al regarding Mandatory injunction
Case between plaintiff Vismaya.M., Sindhu and defendants The State of Kerala et al. It is a mandatory injunction suit.
Mandatory injunction
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 317 OF 2019
Case between Pavithra Satheesan vs General Convener et al regarding mandatory injunction
Case between Pavithra Satheesan and others vs General Convener et al, Appeal Committee Chairman and State of Kerala regarding mandatory injunction.
Mandatory Injunction
Defendant Won
EP 225/2017
Case between Govindan vs Melvi et al regarding Property delivered
Case involves Govindan as the Decree Holder against Melvi and others as the Judgment Debtors. The case has been decided with the property being delivered.
Execution Petition
O.S. No. 1407/2018
Case between M N Vishwambaran vs Greater Cochin Development Authority et al regarding dismissal for default.
The plaintiff, M N Vishwambaran, is an elderly individual who attempted to pursue a suit against the Greater Cochin Development Authority and its officials. However, the court found that the plaintiff did not take necessary steps to proceed with the case, resulting in a dismissal for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 303/2018
Case between K.A.Muralimohan vs State of Kerala et al regarding civil suit
K.A.Muralimohan filed a civil suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The case involves disputes addressed in several interim applications, leading to the rejection of the plaintiff's plaint.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 722/2022
Case between Mohammed Firoz V.I vs The Deputy Chief Electrical Inspector et al regarding Balance Court Fee
Mohammed Firoz V.I is the plaintiff in this case, while several officials from the Electrical Inspectorate and the State of Kerala are the defendants. The case revolves around the rejection of the plaintiff's suit due to non-payment of the balance court fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 102/2021
Case between Bijin P.R et al vs Kerala Water Authority et al regarding petition to set aside ex parte decree
The case involves Bijin P.R and others seeking relief against the Kerala Water Authority and its officials for an ex parte decree passed due to their non-appearance. The petitioners argue that their absence was due to the lack of legal representation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 850/2023
Case between Thiruvithamkoor Devaswam Board et al vs Sindhu K.P. regarding payment of court fees.
The case involves the Thiruvithamkoor Devaswam Board and its Administrative Officer against Sindhu K.P. The plaint was rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 507/2020
Case between The Kerala State Civil Supplies Co Corporation vs T.A. Abdulla regarding realization of money
The Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation has filed a suit against T.A. Abdulla for the realization of money due to irregularities found in the sale of subsidized items during his tenure as an outlet in-charge. The allegations include the sale of subsidized commodities in excess of the allowed limits leading to a financial loss for the corporation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 3 OF 2017
Case between Theertha vs General Convener et al regarding mandatory Injunction.
Theertha, a minor represented by her mother, filed a suit against the General Convener and others regarding a mandatory injunction. The suit was dismissed for default due to lack of payment of batta.
Injunction
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 295 OF 2016
Case between Jahfar vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Pattambi et al regarding Injunction
Jahfar, as the plaintiff, filed a suit for injunction against multiple defendants including police officials and the Government of Kerala. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was absent and unrepresented.
Injunction
Defendant Won
Restor.Ptn 2133/2018
Case between Enikutty Haji vs State of kerala regarding Restoration petition
Enikutty Haji has filed a restoration petition against the State of Kerala represented by the District Collector. The court allowed the petition after the respondent's counsel expressed no objection.
Restoration petition
Plaintiff Won
EP 220/2018
Case between Moideen Haji vs Assistant Education Officer regarding Decree Execution
Moideen Haji is the decree holder, and the Assistant Education Officer is the judgment debtor. The court addressed an execution petition concerning the decree holder's claim.
Decree Execution
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 137/2019
Case between Baby vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding dismissal for default.
The case involves a plaintiff named Baby who filed a suit against the Kerala State Electricity Board and its officials. The plaintiff was absent during the trial, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 34/2019
Case between Joshi Paul vs The District Collector et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
This case involves plaintiffs Joshi Paul and Saju T.K. against multiple defendants including government officials and a private individual. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' absence and failure to present evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.408/2020
Case between M/s Cement Bricks and Allied Industries & Kizhakkambalam Granites Workers Federation vs Government of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit.
The case involves M/s Cement Bricks and Allied Industries and Kizhakkambalam Granites Workers Federation as plaintiffs suing the Government of Kerala and other parties. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
E.P. 227/2022
Case between Peumbavoor Government Servents Society No.131 vs Sudha T K et al regarding dismissal as default
The case involves Peumbavoor Government Servents Society No.131 as the decree holder represented by Secretary Vinod K P against the judgment debtors Sudha T K, Santha C K, and Bindhu O R. The court dismissed the case as the judgment debtors were absent and no steps were taken after a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.119/2020
Case between John Paul K. et al vs Government of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
The plaintiffs, including John Paul K. and his family, initiated a suit against the Government of Kerala and associated officials. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O. S. No.432/2020
Case between O Varkey vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal for default.
The plaintiff, O Varkey, represented by advocates, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and several other defendants. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 1031/2021
Case between Joseph Sijan T.X vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding recovery of Earnest Money Deposit
Joseph Sijan T.X filed a suit against Greater Cochin Development Authority for the recovery of Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) following issues with parking fee collection. The plaintiff argues that the defendant failed to fulfill obligations, while the defendant states the plaintiff's claim is barred by limitation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 202/2019
Case between Manikandan.P vs Kerala Home Guard Association State Committee et al regarding suspension and injunction.
Manikandan.P, the plaintiff and President of the Ernakulam District Committee, challenges his suspension from the committee and seeks a prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The defendants, including the Kerala Home Guard Association, argue that the plaintiff's suspension was warranted due to his misconduct and absence from an executive meeting.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1197/2024
Case between Jacob Pulikkan et al vs Kerala Start Up Mission regarding deletion of a party from the suit.
This case involves a petition to delete Defendant No 7, Kerala Start Up Mission, from a civil suit. The court found that the defendant was not a necessary party for the adjudication of the suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 26 /2025
Case between Amar Alexander vs State of Kerala regarding a civil suit
Amar Alexander, a minor, represented by his mother, filed a civil suit against the State of Kerala and the Deputy Director of Education. The suit was heard and subsequently dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No . 807/2024
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Amel Manoj et al regarding suit rejection due to lack of court fee.
The plaintiff is Indian Overseas Bank, represented by its Branch Manager. The defendants include Amel Manoj and others, and the case was about a suit that was rejected due to non-payment of court fees.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No . 26/2022
Case between Benny et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit
Benny and Jayapalan filed a suit against the State of Kerala and others. The court dismissed the case with costs due to the plaintiffs not being present or ready for evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 865/2018
Case between M A Manoharan vs The State of Kerala et al regarding realization of money
The plaintiff, M A Manoharan, is seeking compensation for damages due to the construction of a fish landing harbour by the defendants, which he claims has obstructed his ability to operate his Chinese fishing net. The defendants include government officials and the Kumbalam Grama Panchayat.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 901/2015
Case between P. Sivasankara Panicker vs Union of India, Tata Communications Ltd et al regarding termination of employment
P. Sivasankara Panicker, plaintiff, challenged the termination of his employment with Tata Communications Ltd, claiming it was illegal and made under duress. The defendants, including the Union of India and Tata Communications Ltd, argued that the plaintiff's termination was lawful and pursuant to agreed terms following the privatization of VSNL.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 377 /2016
Case between M R Harikumar vs State of Kerala et al regarding status quo on plaint schedule property.
M R Harikumar filed a petition requesting the court to direct the defendants to maintain status quo regarding a property. The court agreed to this request due to a delay in serving the judgment to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 784/2021
Case between David Paul vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed
David Paul filed a suit against various government departments regarding a civil matter. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed when the plaintiff did not appear.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1435/2019
Case between A.S. Saji vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal for default
A.S. Saji is the plaintiff in this case against the State of Kerala and the Deputy Director of Fisheries. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff did not appear or provide evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won