Case Summary
The plaintiff, O Varkey, represented by advocates, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and several other defendants. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence during the proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- O Varkey
- Party Age
- 80
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- State of Kerala
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Tahsidar, Kunnathunad Taluk
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Village Officer, Village Office Vengola
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (PWD)
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department (PWD)
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V G Sajeev Panicker
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aneesha Mani
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between O Varkey vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between O Varkey vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal for default.