Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 34/2019

Case between Joshi Paul vs The District Collector et al regarding suit dismissal for default.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-03-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves plaintiffs Joshi Paul and Saju T.K. against multiple defendants including government officials and a private individual. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' absence and failure to present evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff did not appear or provide evidence during the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff did not appear or provide evidence during the proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not appear for the trial and failed to present evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff did not appear for the trial and failed to present evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not present, not represented. Called absent. Today posted for trial of the suit. Plaintiff did not turn up to adduce evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joshi Paul
Party Age
49
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saju T.K.
Party Age
52
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The District Collector
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Assistant Executive Engineer
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Assistant Engineer
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mathew Cheriyan
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.K. Dileepan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Tomy Louiz
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G. Govindan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.O. Santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not present, not represented. Called absent. Today posted for trial of the suit. Plaintiff did not turn up to adduce evidence. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Joshi Paul vs The District Collector et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Joshi Paul vs The District Collector et al regarding suit dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between John Paul K. et al vs Government of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between O Varkey vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Peumbavoor Government Servents Society No.131 vs Sudha T K et al regarding dismissal as default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Cement Bricks and Allied Industries & Kizhakkambalam Granites Workers Federation vs Government of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Baby vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won