Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P. 227/2022

Case between Peumbavoor Government Servents Society No.131 vs Sudha T K et al regarding dismissal as default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-10-28
Duration
Case Code No.
227
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Peumbavoor Government Servents Society No.131 as the decree holder represented by Secretary Vinod K P against the judgment debtors Sudha T K, Santha C K, and Bindhu O R. The court dismissed the case as the judgment debtors were absent and no steps were taken after a specified date.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff as the judgment debtors did not appear or take any steps in the case, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff as the judgment debtors did not appear or take any steps in the case, leading to its dismissal.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The judgment debtors were absent and failed to take steps in the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The judgment debtors were absent and failed to take steps in the case.
Supporting Evidence
The judgment debtors absent. No steps taken after 21.08.2025.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed as default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Peumbavoor Government Servents Society No.131
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudha T K
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santha C K
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bindhu O R
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
N/A
Defendants Documents
N/A

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anilkumar S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Abani P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anas C A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Remya Velayudhan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nidhin Kumar A P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed as default due to the absence of the judgment debtors and lack of action taken.
Evidence:
No steps taken after 21.08.2025. Hence dismissed as default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
E.P.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between John Paul K. et al vs Government of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between O Varkey vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Cement Bricks and Allied Industries & Kizhakkambalam Granites Workers Federation vs Government of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Joshi Paul vs The District Collector et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Baby vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won