Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 377 /2016

Case between M R Harikumar vs State of Kerala et al regarding status quo on plaint schedule property.

Court
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-09-17
Duration
approximately-9 years
Case Closed
Wed, 09/17/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M R Harikumar filed a petition requesting the court to direct the defendants to maintain status quo regarding a property. The court agreed to this request due to a delay in serving the judgment to the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the request to maintain status quo for one week regarding the property, due to the delay in serving the judgment to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Maintaining status quo on plaint schedule property for one week.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the request to maintain status quo for one week regarding the property, due to the delay in serving the judgment to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court was satisfied with the petitioner's request considering the delay in receiving the judgment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court was satisfied with the petitioner's request considering the delay in receiving the judgment.
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that petition is to be allowed in the interest of justice.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence defendants are directed to maintain status quo for one week till carbon copy of order is issued to petitioner.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M R Harikumar
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
District Collector, Ernakulam
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Assistant Executive Engineer, PWD Roads Sub Division
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P A Razia
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K C Charles
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vimal K Charles
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M D Suni
Appearance Type
Government Pleader
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P Viswanathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manoj P M
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anoopa M J
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to maintain status quo for one week till carbon copy of order is issued to petitioner.
Evidence:
the court is satisfied that petition is to be allowed in the interest of justice. Hence defendants are directed to maintain status quo for one week till carbon copy of order is issued to petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M R Harikumar vs State of Kerala et al regarding status quo on plaint schedule property.
Case Code Year
Case between M R Harikumar vs State of Kerala et al regarding status quo on plaint schedule property.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 09/17/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Bijin P.R et al vs Kerala Water Authority et al regarding petition to set aside ex parte decree
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thiruvithamkoor Devaswam Board et al vs Sindhu K.P. regarding payment of court fees.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mohammed Firoz V.I vs The Deputy Chief Electrical Inspector et al regarding Balance Court Fee
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.A.Muralimohan vs State of Kerala et al regarding civil suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M N Vishwambaran vs Greater Cochin Development Authority et al regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won