Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 303/2018

Case between K.A.Muralimohan vs State of Kerala et al regarding civil suit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-12-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.A.Muralimohan filed a civil suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The case involves disputes addressed in several interim applications, leading to the rejection of the plaintiff's plaint.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The application for interim relief was allowed, while other applications were dismissed. The plaint was rejected.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The application for interim relief was allowed, while other applications were dismissed. The plaint was rejected.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Pronounced by me in Open Court on this the 06th day of December, 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.A.Muralimohan
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Tahsildar
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Superintendent of Survey & Land Records
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Taluk Surveyor
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Village Officer
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.Rajagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Syam V.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Megha Mariam Alea
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arjun S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint is rejected in accordance with the order in IA 6/25.
Evidence:
Plaint is rejected in accordance with the order in IA 6/25.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
IA 6/25 is allowed.
Evidence:
IA 6/25 is allowed Vide Separate Order.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
IA 2/22 and 7/25 is dismissed.
Evidence:
IA 2/22 and 7/25 is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.A.Muralimohan vs State of Kerala et al regarding civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between K.A.Muralimohan vs State of Kerala et al regarding civil suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Bijin P.R et al vs Kerala Water Authority et al regarding petition to set aside ex parte decree
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Kerala State Civil Supplies Co Corporation vs T.A. Abdulla regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thiruvithamkoor Devaswam Board et al vs Sindhu K.P. regarding payment of court fees.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mohammed Firoz V.I vs The Deputy Chief Electrical Inspector et al regarding Balance Court Fee
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M N Vishwambaran vs Greater Cochin Development Authority et al regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won