Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 507/2020

Case between The Kerala State Civil Supplies Co Corporation vs T.A. Abdulla regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation has filed a suit against T.A. Abdulla for the realization of money due to irregularities found in the sale of subsidized items during his tenure as an outlet in-charge. The allegations include the sale of subsidized commodities in excess of the allowed limits leading to a financial loss for the corporation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed both suits, concluding that the plaintiffs failed to establish their case by the preponderance of probabilities, and thus no relief was granted. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed both suits, concluding that the plaintiffs failed to establish their case by the preponderance of probabilities, and thus no relief was granted. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not succeed in proving the case against the defendant sufficiently.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs have not succeeded in establishing its case by the standard of preponderance of probabilities.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suits are dismissed. The parties are directed to suffer their respective costs to the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Kerala State Civil Supplies Co Corporation
Relation
represented by its Chairman & Managing Director
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chairman and Managing Director, The Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.A. Abdulla
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o. T. M. Ali
Plaintiffs Documents
Authorisation issued by Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation, Audit Report of the Junior Manager Internal Audit Wing, Charge Memo, Reply Explanation submitted by T.A Abdulla, various certified copies of circulars.
Defendants Documents
Photo copy of Order No. 479/2021, Judgment in WP (c) No. 32471/23.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Molly Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
John Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiffs sought to recover ₹1,54,974.50/- with interest.
Evidence:
the plaintiffs are not entitled to realise an amount of ₹1,54,974.50/- with interest @ 12% per annum from the defendants as prayed for.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiffs sought to recover ₹1,23,776/- with interest.
Evidence:
the plaintiffs are not entitled to get a decree of realisation of ₹1,23,776/- with interest at 18% per annum from the defendant or from his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Authorization
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Authorization issued by Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation in favour of Sooraj P.T in respect of O.S 507/2020
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Authorization
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Authorization issued by Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation in favour of Sooraj P.T in respect of O.S 971/2020
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter issued by Food and Civil Supplies Department
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Audit report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Audit Report of the Junior Manager Internal Audit Wing
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Charge Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of Charge Memo detailing specific charges against the defendant
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Reply Explanation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply Explanation submitted by the defendant
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Circular
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Circular No. 16/09
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Circular
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Circular No. 16/2015 issued by Managing Director
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Circular
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Circular No. 23/2018
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of letter bearing No. M2/4047/2005
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of letter bearing No. M2/4047/05
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter submitted by the defendant
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice of Additional General Manager to Smt. Anu Krishnan
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice of Additional General Manager to Sri. Sivananda Kammath
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Judgment in WP(c) No. 41378 of 2018
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Judgment in WA No. 2121/2019
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Computer print out of Ration Card Excess Sale report
Reference:
Ext.A17
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice bearing No. 1A W7 -20712/2019
Reference:
Ext.A18
Document Type: Charge Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Charge Memo bearing No. A6/5388/19
Reference:
Ext.A19
Document Type: Proceedings
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proceedings bearing No. G.O (Rt) 366/2023/F & CS
Reference:
Ext.A20
Document Type: Explanation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Explanation of Dinkar G. M, Junior Manager
Reference:
Ext.A21
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Photo copy of Order No. 479/2021
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Judgment in WP (c) No. 32471/23
Reference:
Ext.B2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between The Kerala State Civil Supplies Co Corporation vs T.A. Abdulla regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between The Kerala State Civil Supplies Co Corporation vs T.A. Abdulla regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between M A Manoharan vs The State of Kerala et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bijin P.R et al vs Kerala Water Authority et al regarding petition to set aside ex parte decree
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mohammed Firoz V.I vs The Deputy Chief Electrical Inspector et al regarding Balance Court Fee
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.A.Muralimohan vs State of Kerala et al regarding civil suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M N Vishwambaran vs Greater Cochin Development Authority et al regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won