Case Summary
Mohammed Firoz V.I is the plaintiff in this case, while several officials from the Electrical Inspectorate and the State of Kerala are the defendants. The case revolves around the rejection of the plaintiff's suit due to non-payment of the balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's plaint due to the non-payment of the balance court fee. As a result, the pending interim applications were also closed, with no costs awarded.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to remit the required balance court fee.
The plaintiff failed to remit the required balance court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to remit the required balance court fee.
The plaintiff failed to remit the required balance court fee.
Supporting Evidence
No Balance Court Fee seen remitted so far.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the plaint is rejected for non payment of Balance Court Fee.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mohammed Firoz V.I
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Deputy Chief Electrical Inspector
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Asst. Electrical Inspector
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sri. Sagar V.K
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sri. Santhosh C
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chief Electrical Inspector
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sabu P. Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.N. Sreekumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manju Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anil Prasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Beyon T. Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arya K.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Lijo Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C.T. Jestin
- Appearance Type
- Government Pleader
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff's request for extending the period for remitting balance court fee.
Evidence:
the plaint is rejected for non payment of Balance Court Fee.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohammed Firoz V.I vs The Deputy Chief Electrical Inspector et al regarding Balance Court Fee
Case Code Year
Case between Mohammed Firoz V.I vs The Deputy Chief Electrical Inspector et al regarding Balance Court Fee