Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No . 26/2022

Case between Benny et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-05-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Benny and Jayapalan filed a suit against the State of Kerala and others. The court dismissed the case with costs due to the plaintiffs not being present or ready for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed with costs as the plaintiffs were not present or ready to present their evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed with costs as the plaintiffs were not present or ready to present their evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs failed to appear and present evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs failed to appear and present evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case.

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Benny
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayapalan
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tahsildar, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Village Officer, Thiruvamkulam Village, Thiruvamkulam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Secretary, Thrippunithura Municipality, Thrippunithura
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. K Sathyan
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Laijo P. Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Viji V.P (Addl. Govt. Pleader)
Appearance Type
Government Pleader
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Abraham P. George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The plaintiff's suit was dismissed with costs.
Evidence:
Dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Benny et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Benny et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Bijin P.R et al vs Kerala Water Authority et al regarding petition to set aside ex parte decree
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thiruvithamkoor Devaswam Board et al vs Sindhu K.P. regarding payment of court fees.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mohammed Firoz V.I vs The Deputy Chief Electrical Inspector et al regarding Balance Court Fee
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.A.Muralimohan vs State of Kerala et al regarding civil suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M N Vishwambaran vs Greater Cochin Development Authority et al regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won