Similar Cases
Based on: OS. No. 815/2023 — Case between Sadasivan vs Shiju regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS. No. 535/2021
Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Yesudasan, filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Jincy, Binu, and an unnamed older defendant. The case arose from disputes over a pathway used by both parties and previous incidents of trespassing and threats by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 976/2023
Case between Emilin Binoy et al vs Thresya Fernandes @ Tresa Albert et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Emilin Binoy, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Thresya Fernandes and Jannet, who are attempting to illegally encroach on her property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property and has faced threats and harassment from the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 470/2024
Case between Soman Pillai vs Radhakrishna Pillai regarding temporary injunction.
Soman Pillai filed a petition against Radhakrishna Pillai for a temporary injunction concerning a property dispute. The plaintiff claims the defendant encroached on his property and caused damage.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 601/2024
Case between Nazimudheen vs Shahul Hameed et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Nazimudheen filed a suit against the defendants for permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain them from trespassing into his property. The plaintiff claimed he is the absolute owner and has been facing attempts of trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.788/2019
Case between Saneer et al vs Sijo Mary regarding discharge of temporary injunction.
The case involves Saneer and Fousiya as additional defendants, seeking to discharge a temporary injunction obtained by the plaintiff, Sijo Mary. The plaintiff claims a right of way over the property owned by the defendants, leading to disputes over property access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 237/2022
Case between Suresh Kumar.S. vs Narayana Pillai et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiffs, Suresh Kumar.S. and Bindu Lekha, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Narayana Pillai and Madhusudhanan Pillai, to prevent them from interfering with the construction of boundary walls on their property. The plaintiffs assert that they are the rightful owners of the property and have faced disturbances from the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.994/2016
Case between Raveendran Pillai et al vs Kerala State et al regarding injunction.
Raveendran Pillai and Beena filed a suit against the Kerala State and other defendants regarding an injunction. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.210/2025
Case between Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple et al vs Biju Panicker et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The petitioners include the Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple and its representatives, who are seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents to prevent them from obstructing the reinstallation of the temple idol. The respondents include members of the temple committee who are alleged to be causing disruptions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 535/2021
Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Yesudasan, claims ownership of a property and seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who have allegedly trespassed and threatened him. The defendants express interest in purchasing the property but resort to violence when their demands are not met.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1011/2023
Case between Dileep K J vs Raju et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff Dileep K J is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Raju and his family members, who are allegedly threatening to encroach upon his property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the land and seeks to prevent defendants from trespassing and demolishing his property boundary.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 828/2018
Case between Vishnu vs N. Muthulakshmi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Vishnu filed a suit against N. Muthulakshmi and Ramdas Potty for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants from evicting him from the rented property. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants threatened him to vacate the premises unlawfully.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 166/2023
Case between Adv.V.Vinayachandran et al vs Gayathri Devi regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, three advocates, are tenants of rooms owned by the defendant and are seeking to prevent eviction due to a rent hike. They claim that the defendant's actions threaten their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 284/2023
Case between Sasikumar vs Ushadevarajan, Thankamani Vijayan regarding permanent prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Sasikumar, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Ushadevarajan and Thankamani Vijayan, who are allegedly attempting to encroach upon his property. The defendants have also obstructed the reconstruction of a compound wall.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 304/2022
Case between Karmali vs Charles regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Karmali, the absolute owner of a property, filed a suit against the defendant Charles for obstructing access to her property. The defendant allegedly began blocking the only pathway leading to the plaintiff's property, claiming ownership of an adjacent area.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 753/2024
Case between Sankaran Nampoothiri vs Kollam Muncipal Corporation regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Sankaran Nampoothiri is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Kollam Muncipal Corporation. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant is planning to trespass and demolish boundary walls of his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 704/2018
Case between Ansad et al vs Jameela Beevi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Ansad and Nabeesath, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Jameela Beevi and Nadirsha, to prevent them from interfering with a pathway they have been using for access to their properties. The defendants deny the existence of the pathway and claim it belongs solely to them.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 615/2025
Case between Kiran Krishna vs S.D. Ajith Kumar regarding Temporary Injunction
Kiran Krishna, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against S.D. Ajith Kumar, the defendant, who cancelled her booking for a wedding reception at a temple auditorium. The case revolves around the plaintiff's efforts to secure the venue for her marriage reception scheduled for January 3, 2026.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 807/2024
Case between G. Haridasan Potty vs Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
G. Haridasan Potty filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom after the defendants aimed to obstruct his daily rituals at the temple. The case centers around the plaintiff's rights to perform rituals at the temple without interference.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.123/2020
Case between G.Rajesh et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding injunction.
The plaintiffs, G.Rajesh and T. Jayasree, filed a suit for injunction against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 342/2022
Case between Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple et al vs Bhasuran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple and its Secretary Ganesh.T, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Bhasuran and Selvakumar. The case revolves around the defendants creating disturbances and attempting to encroach upon the temple property, which is managed by the new committee elected after the defendants were removed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 601/2020
Case between Reghu. K et al vs Rengan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Reghu. K, Ratheesh. K, and Omana, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Rengan, Ponnamma, and Radhika Rengan, to restrain them from encroaching upon a pathway claimed by the plaintiffs. The defendants contend that the pathway is their property and deny the plaintiffs' right to use it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 194/2022
Case between Richard Hentry vs Nickolas Joseph et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Richard Hentry, the plaintiff, claims ownership and possession of a property from which he seeks protection against the defendants, his neighbors, who he alleges are attempting to trespass. The defendants are also his business partners.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 14/2025
Case between Sugathan vs Shyama et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Sugathan claims ownership of property and seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants for trespassing and damaging his property. The defendants, including Shyama and others, have allegedly attempted to widen a pathway and have caused damage to the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 453/2020
Case between Nazeeb vs Nizamudheen regarding injunction
The case involves a suit filed by Nazeeb against Nizamudheen over illegal construction. The plaintiff claims that the defendant began unauthorized construction that violated the Kerala Panchayath Raj Act.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 676/2018
Case between V.M.Jayaprakasan et al vs Ushakumary et al regarding injunction
The case involves V.M.Jayaprakasan and additional plaintiffs seeking a permanent injunction against Ushakumary and others to prevent obstruction of boundary wall construction on their property. The plaintiffs claim ownership and the defendants are accused of attempting to encroach on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 963/2023
Case between Moly Kutty vs Sajitha et al regarding Temporary Injunction
Moly Kutty filed a petition for a Temporary Injunction against Sajitha and Vidhesh regarding an illegally constructed kitchen shed that causes health hazards due to smoke and foul smell. The defendants reside next to the plaintiff and have constructed the shed without permission, prompting the plaintiff to seek court intervention.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 89/2022
Case between Padma Kumari vs Madhusoodanan Pillai et al regarding Realisation of Money
Padma Kumari, the plaintiff, is seeking to realise an amount of Rs. 2,00,000 from the defendants for cutting down valuable trees on her property. The defendant claims they weren't responsible for the actions of their tenant who is alleged to have committed the act.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 416/2022
Case between Kunjumol vs The Kollam Corporation et al regarding permanent injunction.
The plaintiffs, Kunjumol and Aloysius, are husband and wife seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants, including the Kollam Corporation and other governmental bodies. They claim to have continuous possession of 3.5 cents of land against illegal encroachment and threats from individuals affiliated with the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.221/2025
Case between Rajkapoor.K vs Sulfikkar et al regarding temporary injunction
Rajkapoor.K filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction to prevent Sulfikkar and the Authorised Officer of Canara Bank from forcibly evicting him from a property without returning a deposit. The plaintiff claims to reside in the property and is facing eviction due to a notice issued by the second defendant.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 16/2020
Case between R.Bahuleyan et al vs Prasad.K et al regarding Injunction
The plaintiffs, R.Bahuleyan and B.Devarajan, are seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, Prasad.K, Bindhu, Perayam Grama Panchayath, and The Deputy Director of Panchayat, to demolish an unauthorized construction affecting their property. The defendants have constructed a thatched shop without permitted authorization.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 188/2025
Case between Chellamma et al vs Thampi regarding injunction
The case involves Chellamma and her daughter Thankamani as petitioners against Thampi, the respondent. The petitioners seek an injunction to prevent the respondent from evicting them from their residence.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 525/2023
Case between Ramachandran Nair vs The Travancore Devaswom Board et al regarding Declaration and Injunction
The plaintiff, Ramachandran Nair, is the managing trustee of the Karipezhathu family temple and is claiming absolute title over the property against the defendants, who are attempting to claim control over it. The court was asked to declare the plaintiff's title and prevent the defendants from interfering.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 626/2024
Case between Soudamini et al vs Rejimon et al regarding temporary injunction.
The plaintiffs, Soudamini and Vilasini, filed for a temporary injunction against the defendants, Rejimon, Sunil Kumar, and Sahadevan, to prevent them from encroaching on their property and causing damage. The defendants allegedly trespassed and demolished parts of the plaintiffs' property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 285/2018
Case between East Kallada Scheduled Caste Service Co-operative Society Ltd. No. Q 1455 et al vs Dr. Bimalkumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves the East Kallada Scheduled Caste Service Co-operative Society Ltd. which filed a suit against Dr. Bimalkumar seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent eviction from a rented property. The plaintiffs allege threats of eviction by the defendant, claiming unlawful possession after the expiry of the lease agreement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 64/2024
Case between Nizam S et al vs Usha Amma et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunctions
The plaintiffs, Nizam S and Sheeja, are husband and wife seeking relief regarding their property against the defendants, Usha Amma and Aparna. The case involves a dispute over boundary fixation and allegations of trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 335/2025
Case between Sreehari.M vs The Manager, The Kerala State Financial Enterprises Ltd et al regarding injunction against salary deduction
Sreehari.M, the plaintiff, filed for an injunction against defendants for unauthorized salary deductions made to recover a loan liability of his deceased father. The plaintiff argues that these deductions are illegal and without consent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 875/2019
Case between Syam vs Bhavani regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves a dispute between Syam and Rugmini as plaintiffs and Bhavani, Rejani, and Thulasi as defendants regarding access to a pathway. The plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction against the defendants for interfering with their access to their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 847/2024
Case between Rakesh Bharathan vs Biju.V regarding recovery of possession and damages.
Rakesh Bharathan, the plaintiff, is seeking to recover possession of his property from Biju.V, the defendant, who is currently in unauthorized possession. The dispute arose when the defendant refused to vacate the property after an oral notice of revocation of license was issued.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 775/2019
Case between Lalitha et al vs Omana et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs and defendants, neighbors, are involved in a dispute concerning a pathway that the plaintiffs allege is obstructed by the defendants. The case seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from obstructing access to this pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 818/2022
Case between Joseph Arch Paul @ Unnirajan vs Jaya Bhaskar, Rajesh Kumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
Joseph Arch Paul @ Unnirajan is the plaintiff claiming ownership and possession of a property. The defendants, Jaya Bhaskar and Rajesh Kumar, allegedly constructed a boundary wall encroaching on the plaintiff's access pathway, leading to this suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 872/2018
Case between Anju et al vs Kerala State et al regarding Declaration and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
This case involves plaintiffs Anju, Vinodkumar, and Ambikavathiyamma against the Kerala State and others regarding a dispute over possession of property and a boundary wall. The plaintiffs claim ownership and seek injunction against the defendants who issued a notice regarding the wall's alleged illegal construction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 366/2022
Case between Shyamala Devi Amma vs Dinil et al regarding recovery of vacant possession and injunction
The plaintiff, Shyamala Devi Amma, is seeking recovery of vacant possession of her property and a perpetual injunction against the defendants who have been occupying the property without legal rights. The defendants include Dinil, Athulya.V.S, and two minors, who have resisted the plaintiff's efforts to reclaim her property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 89 OF 2016
Case between Indus Towers ltd. vs Muhammed Abdul Khadar regarding injunction.
Indus Towers ltd. filed a suit against Muhammed Abdul Khadar for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant obstructed their access to their mobile telephone infrastructure on the defendant's property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 976/2024
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Benny John and Reena, sought a temporary injunction against the defendant, Anivrithan, to prevent him from selling a property involved in a disputed sale agreement. The defendant contested the allegations, claiming no such agreement existed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 346/2024
Case between Coconut Grove Residents Association vs Maradu Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The Coconut Grove Residents Association, represented by its Secretary Dr. Stephen Puthumana, filed a suit against Maradu Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the Municipality from interfering with the private road maintained by the Association. The Municipality issued a notice demanding proof of road ownership and threatened to remove a cross bar installed to control unauthorized access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 281/2021
Case between Pathumma vs Beena Subair et al regarding perpetual injunction
Pathumma filed a suit against Beena Subair and Linto Monon P. seeking a perpetual injunction to restrain the defendants from forcefully entering her property. The court found that the defendants had no rights over the property in question.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 138/2022
Case between M.R. Gopinadhan Nair vs Secretary Perumbavoor Municipality regarding perpetual injunction and mandatory injunction
The case involves M.R. Gopinadhan Nair as the plaintiff, who is asking for a perpetual and mandatory injunction against the Secretary of the Perumbavoor Municipality and others regarding unauthorized constructions. The plaintiff claims that the defendants have violated building rules and encroached on his property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.75/2025
Case between Varghese vs State of Kerala et al regarding ownership and possession of property
The petitioner Varghese claims ownership and possession over a property and fears that the respondents are attempting to divert rainwater into his property, which may cause damage. The respondents argue that the water flow into the property is natural and has existed for decades.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won