Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 281/2021

Case between Pathumma vs Beena Subair et al regarding perpetual injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-02-07
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Pathumma filed a suit against Beena Subair and Linto Monon P. seeking a perpetual injunction to restrain the defendants from forcefully entering her property. The court found that the defendants had no rights over the property in question.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, granting a perpetual injunction against the defendants. The evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Perpetual injunction against the defendants from entering the property
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence adduced by the plaintiff was unchallenged and proved the plaintiff's case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows:- The defendants or their men are to be restrained from entering forcefully in to plaint schedule property or evicting the plaintiff and his family from the plaint schedule property or forcefully encroach into the plaint schedule property by way of perpetual injunction.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Pathumma (63 years years) Changachery House, Perumbavoor Kara, Perumbavoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Defendants

Beena Subair (47 years years) Chulliparambil House, Paravuthara Mannam Kara, Kottuvally Village, Paravoor Taluk, Ernakulam District Linto Monon P. (52 years years) North Paravoor Branch, Chendamangalam Junction, North Paravoor

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are to be restrained from entering forcefully into the plaint schedule property or evicting the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence, I find that the plaintiffs are entitled for the relief of perpetual injunction as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document proves the plaintiff's ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is a certificate issued by the Perumbavoor Municipality supporting the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice pertains to CMP 675/2021 and is part of the evidence presented by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases