Similar Cases
Based on: EP/85/2025 — Case between Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society Ltd vs Ratheesh P K et al regarding execution of decree
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
ORIGINAL SUIT No.20/2023
Case between Niravu Farmers Producer Company Ltd vs The Chathamangalam Grama Panchayath regarding realization of an amount due
Niravu Farmers Producer Company Ltd is the plaintiff seeking to recover an amount due from The Chathamangalam Grama Panchayath, the defendant. The case involved a claim presented under the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 509/2018
Case between Indira vs Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath regarding suit dismissal for default
Indira, the plaintiff, was involved in a suit against Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath, the defendant. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 510/2018
Case between Kelan vs Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath regarding dismissal for default.
Kelan, the plaintiff, is involved in a suit against Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath, the defendant. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 511/2018
Case between Indira vs Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath regarding dismissal for default
Indira filed a lawsuit against Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 19/2018
Case between JASHILNADH. R vs VADAKKAYIL PATHU et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and declaration
Jashilnadh. R is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against VADAKKAYIL PATHU and others, who are accused of attempting to unlawfully construct a retaining wall affecting the plaintiff's property rights. The case centers on the right of way to the plaint A schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 120/2024
Case between Kunhabdulla vs Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
This case involves Kunhabdulla, the plaintiff, who is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali, to prevent them from trespassing onto his property for a road widening project. The defendants allegedly entered the property without consent and marked sections they claimed were necessary for the road work.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 122/2024
Case between RAKHI @ RAGISHA vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Rakhi @ Ragisha and Kamala, seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali and others, who are alleged to have trespassed into their property to mark for road widening without consent. The plaintiffs contest the defendants' claims of rights over their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 124/2024
Case between SURESH vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs SURESH and RAHNA seeking a permanent injunction against defendants VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI, AKHILA MARIYAT, C. K. NAZAR, K. T. K CHANDRAN, NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, and URALUNGAL LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. to restrain them from trespassing and committing acts of waste on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 268 OF 2016
Case between Ismail et al vs G. Surendran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves plaintiffs Ismail, Najmudheen, Kunhalavi Haji, and Anwar Sadath suing defendants G. Surendran, Abdul Salm, Abdul Gafoor, and Sekkeena for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiffs were absent during the proceedings, leading to the case being dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 314/2021
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs Mohammed Faisal and his wife Shejinamol seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath to prevent construction obstructing their access to a public road. Plaintiffs claim ownership and access rights to their property, while the Panchayath argues it holds valid authority to construct an Anganvadi on the disputed land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 300 /2019
Case between Mr. John Peter vs Edakkattuvayal Grama Panchayat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Mr. John Peter filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against Edakkattuvayal Grama Panchayat and others. The matter was settled in mediation, and the terms were accepted by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No. 314 /2021
Case between Mohammed Faisal vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding interim injunction
The case involves petitioners Mohammed Faisal and Shejinamol seeking an interim injunction against the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath to prevent construction on the northern side of their property. The court found the petition barred by res judicata as a similar matter had previously been decided.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No. 314 /2 021
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding approved building plan
The petitioners, Mohammed Faisal and Shejinamol, are seeking relief concerning the construction of a building. The respondent is the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 08 / 2024
Case between Shaji Varghese et al vs Thiruvaniyoor Grama Panchayat et al regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Shaji Varghese and Baby, seek a temporary injunction against the defendants, which include Thiruvaniyoor Grama Panchayat and Ajimon.K.M, to prevent them from trespassing on their property and demolishing a compound wall. The dispute centers on the ownership and boundaries of several plots of land.
Civil Suit
OS. No.1783/2022
Case between M.G. Siva prasad vs Secretary, Chenkal Grama Panchayath et al regarding Balance Court Fee
M.G. Siva prasad filed a suit against the Secretary of Chenkal Grama Panchayath and others regarding the remittance of balance court fees. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the rejection of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.432/2020
Case between Athira vs Vilavoorkkal Grama Panchayat et al regarding dismissal of suit
Athira, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Vilavoorkkal Grama Panchayat and its officials. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 113/ 2018
Case between Shibily vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding acceptance of witness schedule.
Shibily is the plaintiff seeking to declare a notice as null and void while also requesting to accept a witness schedule for examining the Panchayath Secretary. The defendants argue that the petition is barred by limitation and that the documents are not available.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 107/2018
Case between Chandrahasan et al vs The Secretary, Kadakkavoor Grama Panchayath et al regarding dismissal for default.
The case involves multiple plaintiffs led by Chandrahasan against the Kadakkavoor Grama Panchayath and its committee members. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.462/2021
Case between Kadeeja vs Kunnamagalam Grama Panchayath regarding mandatory injunction
Kadeeja is the plaintiff claiming ownership over a property that the Kunnamagalam Grama Panchayath has converted into a public road. The plaintiff seeks an injunction to remove the construction on her property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 354/2021
Case between Mini vs Puzhakkara Nabeesa et al regarding Mandatory and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Mini, is the owner of a property and seeks to remove obstructions put up by the defendants, Puzhakkara Nabeesa and Subair, to access her property. The case revolves around the existence of a public pathway that has been obstructed by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 71/2025
Case between PURAMERI PANCHAYATH VANITHA CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO 2955 REP BY ITS SECRETARY BINDHU C vs RAJEESH T M regarding EP execution.
The case involves the Purameri Panchayath Vanitha Cooperative Society Ltd represented by its Secretary Bindhu C against Rajeesh T M. The execution petition was reviewed, but JD was reported to be not found, leading to closure of the EP for the time being.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP/70/2025
Case between purameri panchayath vanitha co operative bankrep vs manojan regarding decree debt repayment
The petitioner, purameri panchayath vanitha co operative bankrep, represented by its secretary Bindhu C, is seeking repayment of a decree debt from the respondent Manojan. The respondent has agreed to repay the debt in installments.
Plaintiff Won
EP/86/2025
Case between Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society vs Ratheesh P K regarding enforcement of decree
Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society is the petitioner seeking to enforce a decree against Ratheesh P K, the respondent, who has filed an affidavit to clear the debt over 25 months. The court has temporarily closed the case with the option to revive it if the respondent defaults.
Civil Case
Plaintiff Won
EP No. 84/2025
Case between PURAMERI PANCHAYATH VANITHA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. D. 2955 et al vs NIDHIN. M. M, DAMODHARAN. P regarding enforcement of award.
Purameri Panchayath Vanitha Cooperative Society Ltd. filed a petition against Nidhin. M. M and Damodharan. P for enforcement of an award. The matter was settled in Adalath with terms agreed upon by the parties.
Civil Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S 22/2018
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
Anilkumar filed a petition to withdraw his suit against Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath with permission to file a fresh suit. The case involves a dispute over a pathway and compliance with legal procedures under the Panchayath Raj Act.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 108/2019
Case between Venugopalan Nair vs Padmini Gopinadhan et al regarding mediation settlement
Venugopalan Nair filed a suit against Padmini Gopinadhan and others. The matter was settled in mediation, with lawful terms agreed upon by both parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 81/2024
Case between Reena Thomas et al vs Shibu Thandamparambil et al regarding dismissal for default.
The case involves plaintiffs Reena Thomas, Ponnappan, and Vinl S. Anil against defendants Shibu Thandamparambil, Vinayachandran @ Vijayan, and Koruthodu Grama Panchayath. The plaintiff was absent and did not present evidence, leading to the suit being dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. 216/2024
Case between Shanavas P.H. vs Mundakayam Grama Panchayath et al regarding dismissal of a suit.
Shanavas P.H. filed a suit against Mundakayam Grama Panchayath and its secretary. The plaintiff's counsel indicated that the suit was not pressed, leading to its dismissal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No.69/2023
Case between Sunitha vs Udayanapuram Panchayathu regarding suit dismissal for default.
The plaintiff, Sunitha, initiated the suit against Udayanapuram Panchayathu. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.656/2022
Case between Nubaisa vs Secretary regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves Nubaisa filing a suit against the Secretary of Mayyanad Grama Panchayath regarding a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff was absent during the court proceedings.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.529/2020
Case between Mohandas vs Elampalloor Grama Panchayath et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Mohandas, filed a suit against Elampalloor Grama Panchayath and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 804/2019
Case between P K Haridas et al vs The Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit for mandatory injunction.
The plaintiffs, including P K Haridas and Ashalatha, filed a petition to withdraw their suit against the Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath. The suit was regarding a mandatory injunction to demolish a wall, which no longer exists.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.804/2019
Case between P K Haridas et al vs The Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath regarding dismissal of the suit
The plaintiffs, P K Haridas and others, filed a suit against The Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath. The case involved a hearing on the substance of the matter and the court ultimately dismissed the suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 125/2021
Case between Alikkutty. T. P vs Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji regarding dismissal for default
The plaintiffs are Alikkutty. T. P and Asya, while the defendant is Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji. The case involves a suit filed under the Civil Procedure Code, but the plaintiffs were not ready for evidence, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 47/2024
Case between Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji et al vs Haris et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, led by Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji, allege that the defendants trespassed on their property and caused damage. The case seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants to prevent further interference with the plaintiffs' possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS/1136/1953
Case between Thondarkulangara Korumbathi et al vs Thondarkulangara Chekkon et al regarding preliminary decree
This case involves the petitioners Thondarkulangara Korumbathi and others against the respondents Thondarkulangara Chekkon and others regarding a preliminary decree. The court issued its order on the date specified.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 123/2022
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves JANU, the plaintiff, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against BAHULEYAN @ BABU, the defendant, regarding trespassing and boundary destruction of the plaint schedule property. The petitioner claims identity issues regarding the property need resolution before the court can proceed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 72/2025
Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs ADARSH. A. C et al regarding dismissal of suit.
The case involves SYNDICATE BANK as the plaintiff against ADARSH. A. C and others as defendants concerning a civil suit. The matter was settled, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 148/2025
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MUTHURAJ regarding execution petition
KERALA GRAMIN BANK is the Decree Holder/Plaintiff seeking execution of a petition against MUTHURAJ, who is reported to be abroad. The petition was not executed as the Judgment Debtor was unavailable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 5/2024
Case between Gangadharan vs Ahammad et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff Gangadharan is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for trespassing and constructing a mobile tower in proximity to his property. The defendants include Ahammad and Summit Digital Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., who are accused of disturbing the plaintiff's property boundaries.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 16/2023
Case between Asya vs C. K. Sahad regarding fixation of boundary and recovery of possession
Asya and C. K. Sahad, siblings, are involved in a dispute regarding the encroachment of property. The plaintiff, Asya, claims that the defendant has unlawfully constructed on her property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 17/2025
Case between FEDERAL BANK vs RADHA. N. P et al regarding settlement of suit.
The case involves FEDERAL BANK as the plaintiff and RADHA. N. P, NANU. N. P, RASEETHA. P. B as defendants. The matter has been settled.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 26/2013
Case between Meenakshi Amma vs Kuttiyil Pocker et al regarding dismissal of suit due to abatement.
The plaintiff, Meenakshi Amma, filed a suit against defendants including Kuttiyil Pocker and others. The court found that the plaintiff had expired and no steps were taken to implead legal heirs, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 11/2016
Case between Kurunnan Veetil Usman et al vs Kurunnan Veetil Moideen et al regarding fixation and mandatory injunction.
The petitioners, Kurunnan Veetil Usman and Kurunnan Veetil Safiya, have filed a petition to implead Jameela K.V. as a supplemental defendant in a suit regarding a property dispute. The respondents oppose the petition stating it is belated.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RPIA. No. 21/2024 in OS. No. 50/2022
Case between THERUVATH KANDI HYDER ALI vs KARINGANEENTAVITA SHAHEER regarding restoration of dismissed suit
The petitioner, THERUVATH KANDI HYDER ALI, seeks to restore a suit that was dismissed for default. The respondent, KARINGANEENTAVITA SHAHEER, opposes the petition claiming lack of bonafides and absence of medical evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 133/2024
Case between VASUDEVAN. V. K @ VASU vs V. V. MUHAMMADALI et al regarding Suit dismissal
VASUDEVAN. V. K @ VASU is the plaintiff, and V. V. MUHAMMADALI along with several others are the defendants. The case was about a suit that was not pressed and subsequently dismissed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 91/2024
Case between RAMLA vs SUBAIR regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.
The case involves RAMLA as the plaintiff and SUBAIR as the defendant. It is a petition for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to assist in measuring property boundaries and to provide injunctions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 100/2024
Case between SAMEERA et al vs JAMEELA et al regarding settlement of a civil dispute.
This case involves a civil dispute between the plaintiffs, led by SAMEERA, and the defendants, led by JAMEELA. The matter was settled amicably between the parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won