Case Summary
Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society is the petitioner seeking to enforce a decree against Ratheesh P K, the respondent, who has filed an affidavit to clear the debt over 25 months. The court has temporarily closed the case with the option to revive it if the respondent defaults.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Case
Final Judgment
No
The case has been temporarily closed with a provision to revive it if the respondent fails to comply with the payment plan.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner is agreeable to the terms proposed by the respondent.
The petitioner is agreeable to the terms proposed by the respondent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner is agreeable to the terms proposed by the respondent.
The petitioner is agreeable to the terms proposed by the respondent.
Supporting Evidence
JD filed affidavit stating that he is ready to clear off the decree debt in 25 months by paying Rs 1000/- per month.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, EP is closed for the time being with the liberty to revive EP when JD makes default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ratheesh P K
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- REGHUNATH K M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Ratheesh P K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Pradeep Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society vs Ratheesh P K regarding enforcement of decree
Case Code Year
Case between Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society vs Ratheesh P K regarding enforcement of decree