Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 268 OF 2016

Case between Ismail et al vs G. Surendran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.,B.A, LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2017-02-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Ismail, Najmudheen, Kunhalavi Haji, and Anwar Sadath suing defendants G. Surendran, Abdul Salm, Abdul Gafoor, and Sekkeena for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiffs were absent during the proceedings, leading to the case being dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent during the proceedings. Hence, there was no representation from the plaintiffs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent during the proceedings. Hence, there was no representation from the plaintiffs.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ismail
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Najmudheen
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunhalavi Haji
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anwar Sadath
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
G. Surendran
Relation
Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Salm
Party Age
44
Relation
President
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Gafoor
Party Age
3
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sekkeena
Party Age
40
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.P. Jabir
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.P Sree hari
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.P. Khaleel Ibrahim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit for the permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ismail et al vs G. Surendran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ismail et al vs G. Surendran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 02/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Panchayat

Similar Cases

Case between Mr. John Peter vs Edakkattuvayal Grama Panchayat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kalpakancheri Gramapanchayath vs Ali Muhammad regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ummayya Umma vs The Secretary, Cheriyamundam Grama Panchayath et al regarding Injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Nechikkattil Yahu vs Ponmundam Grama Panchayath regarding building tax collection
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Tax Collection Dispute Defendant Won