Similar Cases
Based on: os. No.20/2018 — Case between PEPCO vs P. P Corporation regarding realization of money
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O. S. No. 04/2023
Case between M/s. Nambiattududy Modern Rice Mill et al vs M/s. Asif Stores et al regarding money
The plaintiffs, a partnership firm and its partners, are suing the defendants for unpaid debts from grocery items purchased. The defendants issued cheques that were dishonored due to insufficient funds.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 209/2020
Case between Buhuleyan V.V vs Shaji P.S regarding loan recovery
Buhuleyan V.V is the plaintiff who loaned Rs. 5,50,000 to Shaji P.S for purchasing gymnasium machinery, but the loan was not repaid. The cheque issued in repayment was dishonored.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 572/2023
Case between M/s Aiswarya Marbles and Floorings vs S J Enterprises regarding realization of money
M/s Aiswarya Marbles and Floorings, a partnership firm, supplied flooring materials to S J Enterprises and claimed non-payment of dues. The plaintiff provided evidence for dishonored cheques and demanded payment, leading to the suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1068/2019
Case between M/s Rajasree Packs vs ISRT Alpha Solutions Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding realization of money
The plaintiff, M/s Rajasree Packs, is a partnership firm seeking recovery of money from ISRT Alpha Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and its director, Anil Kumar G, for unpaid dues related to a supply of corrugated boxes. The plaintiff claims an outstanding amount of Rs.1,77,994/- due to dishonoured cheques and subsequent non-payment.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1232 /2022
Case between Careon Healthcare Solutions (P) Ltd vs Mr.Rajesh regarding realization of money
Careon Healthcare Solutions (P) Ltd is suing Mr.Rajesh for the recovery of a debt amounting to Rs.1,38,378/- with interest. The defendant defaulted on repayment of loans taken for pharmaceuticals and issued dishonored cheques.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No.45/2016
Case between Ibrahim and Rahna vs Poulose et al regarding restoration of a suit
Ibrahim and Rahna filed a petition to restore their suit after it was dismissed for default due to their absence. The court found their reasons for not appearing unconvincing and dismissed the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 86/2018
Case between Thankappan vs Lakshmanan et al regarding partition
This case involves a partition suit filed by Thankappan against his brothers and a few other defendants regarding the share of property and bank deposits left by their deceased father, Krishnan. The defendants were accused of attempting to withdraw the bank deposits without the plaintiff's consent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 242/2024
Case between M/s Greenland Particle Boards Private Limited vs Abdul Azeem Mohammed Koya regarding withdrawal of suit.
M/s Greenland Particle Boards Private Limited has filed a suit against Abdul Azeem Mohammed Koya. The suit was finally heard and dismissed as withdrawn.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 14/2019
Case between M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises et al vs Basil Paul et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiffs, M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises and its partners, filed a suit against the defendants for the recovery of money related to defaults in chitty payments. The case revolves around chitty transactions initiated by the plaintiffs and the defendants' failure to pay the agreed installments.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 29/2019
Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd et al vs Ranjitha Nidheesh et al regarding realization of money
The plaintiff, M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd, is seeking the recovery of a loan amount from the defendants who defaulted on repayments. The suit was brought about after repeated demands for payment were ignored by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 353/2024
Case between Pathrose Jacob vs R.C Central Charitable Trust regarding dismissal of suit
Pathrose Jacob is the plaintiff who filed a suit against R.C Central Charitable Trust. The suit was dismissed as not pressed based on a memo filed by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 45/2019
Case between Saju K.V. vs Kerala State Beverages (Manufacturing and marketing) Corporation Ltd. regarding I.A. No. 2/2025
Saju K.V. filed a petition against Kerala State Beverages Corporation regarding an interlocutory application. The court has heard the petition and delivered an order.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 356/2018
Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd et al vs Dileepkumar P. et al regarding realization of money.
M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd filed a suit against the defendants for the recovery of a defaulted loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan as per the agreed installments.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 326/2017
Case between Biju vs Francis et al regarding demarcation of property shares
Biju, the plaintiff, has sought a direction to demarcate a way through the property to allocate shares. The court found no objection to the petition and allowed it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.236/2013
Case between M/s A.M. Distributors vs Mr. Tejpal Singh, regarding realization of money
The plaintiff, M/s A.M. Distributors, filed a suit against the defendant, Mr. Tejpal Singh, for recovery of money related to defective goods. The case involves issues of contractual obligations and payment defaults.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 05/2022
Case between Greeshma Devi vs Sudha Devi, Kristhudas regarding partition
Greeshma Devi, the plaintiff, is seeking a partition of property inherited from her deceased father P K Bharathan. The defendants are his second wife and son, who currently reside in the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 41/2021
Case between M/s. Supreme Interlock Pavers Pvt. Ltd. vs Reena Chacko et al regarding dismissal of suit.
This case involves M/s. Supreme Interlock Pavers Pvt. Ltd. as the plaintiff and Reena Chacko along with her family as defendants. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.62/2020
Case between Mini vs Kunjappan et al regarding partition.
The plaintiff, Mini, is seeking a partition of the property after the death of her mother, Mariyakutty. The defendants include her father, Kunjappan, and her half-brother, Binu, both of whom have been set ex-parte for failing to appear before the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 10 / 2021
Case between Ammini et al vs Ajitha Sunil et al regarding partition
The plaintiffs, Ammini and her sons Suresh Kumar and Sudheesh Kumar, are seeking a partition of property that belonged to their deceased husband and father, Palliyan. The defendants are Ajitha Sunil, the wife of another deceased son, and her minor son, who are jointly entitled to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 48 / 2017
Case between The National Insurance Company Ltd vs M/s. Vega Cargo and Logistics Pvt Ltd regarding jurisdiction and necessary parties.
This case involves a dispute between The National Insurance Company Ltd and M/s. Vega Cargo and Logistics Pvt Ltd regarding jurisdiction and the necessity of including additional parties in the case. The plaintiffs claim their right to sue without requiring further parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 11 / 2023
Case between C.M Vijayan vs Deepak Rajan, Deena Deepak et al regarding withdrawal of suit.
C.M Vijayan filed a suit against Deepak Rajan and Deena Deepak along with Aikaranad Grama Panchayat regarding certain matters. The suit was dismissed as withdrawn.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 89 / 2024
Case between Mathew Mammen vs Kent Mahal Owners Association et al regarding ad-interim injunction
Mathew Mammen has filed a petition for an ad-interim injunction against the Kent Mahal Owners Association to prevent them from conducting elections until further orders. The court found that without this injunction, irreparable harm could be caused to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 41 / 2018
Case between Metricways Retrogravure Printers Pvt.Ltd vs M/s Packaging Solution Trading Co., Jivraj Jain regarding dismissal for default.
The plaintiff, Metricways Retrogravure Printers Pvt.Ltd, representing through its Managing Director, filed a suit against the defendants, M/s Packaging Solution Trading Co. and its Manager Jivraj Jain. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 15 / 2023
Case between The Federal Bank Ltd vs Roy P.S et al regarding withdrawal of suit.
The Federal Bank Ltd filed a suit against Roy P.S and others. The suit was dismissed as withdrawn by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 33 / 2016
Case between Saranya Rajesh vs Yesodha Mani @ Manju et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Saranya Rajesh, daughter of Mr. Mani, filed a suit against Yesodha Mani and Saran Mani regarding the partition of the property left by her deceased father. The plaintiff claims a share in the property due to her status as a legal heir, while the defendants contest this claim based on a will executed by the deceased.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.06/2021
Case between M/s. Magvolt Energy Private Limited vs Shamon C. Varghese regarding suit dismissal
M/s. Magvolt Energy Private Limited filed a suit against Shamon C. Varghese. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the case being dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.45/2018
Case between David vs Baby, Kunjamma regarding mandatory injunction
David is the plaintiff who is seeking a mandatory injunction against Baby and Kunjamma, the legal heirs of his deceased brother Scaria. The plaintiff alleges that there was a mistake in the land deed regarding the property he owns and seeks to correct it through court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.82/2019
Case between Mohammed Sheffik vs Murali Menon et al regarding declaration and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Mohammed Sheffik filed a suit seeking a declaration and a permanent prohibitory injunction against Murali Menon and others regarding property ownership. The plaintiff claims to be a bona fide purchaser of the property, while the defendants assert prior claims and involvement in ongoing litigation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No 383/2018
Case between Rajan.M vs M/s.Thanima Marbles et al regarding recovery of money
The plaintiff, Rajan.M, is suing the defendants, including M/s.Thanima Marbles, for recovery of money based on dishonored cheques. The defendants claimed that the case is barred by law of limitation as the suit was filed after the limitation period.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.610/2019
Case between Mohammed Yousuf vs Fakrudeen Bava regarding realization of money
Mohammed Yousuf, represented by his power of attorney holder Shine Yousef, is suing his brother Fakrudeen Bava for dishonoring a cheque issued for the repayment of collected rents. The plaintiff claims the defendant acted contrary to his interests, leading to the case.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 45/2021
Case between Simi P vs Shibi P regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, Simi P, is suing her elder sister, Shibi P, seeking to recover an amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- owed under a cheque that was dishonoured. The defendant claims no enforceable debt exists due to the circumstances of the cheque issuance.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O. S. No.279/2017
Case between Antony vs Shibu et al regarding Declaration, boundary fixation, and injunction
The suit involves siblings Antony and Shibu disputing the boundary of their inherited property, leading to unlawful encroachment by Shibu which Antony seeks to remedy.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 136/2018
Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
Garden View Apartment owners Association filed a restoration petition after their suit was dismissed for default when they failed to appear for trial. The court considered the circumstances and allowed the restoration subject to a cost being paid.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 866/2022
Case between Mini Jolly vs Noel et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Mini Jolly, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction against her siblings, Noel, Seena Darwin, Rema Francis, and Shini Godson, regarding their shared inherited properties. The defendants allegedly leased out the properties without her consent, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 976/2024
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Benny John and Reena, sought a temporary injunction against the defendant, Anivrithan, to prevent him from selling a property involved in a disputed sale agreement. The defendant contested the allegations, claiming no such agreement existed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 954/2024
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
Mrs. Julie Sebastian filed a suit against SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. The matter was reported settled, and both parties agreed to the terms of mediation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 913/2022
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
The case involves M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. as the plaintiff and Kalamassery Municipality as the defendant. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1240/2024
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
The case involves M/s Indo Quartz as the plaintiff and M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and others as defendants. The plaintiff filed a petition under Order 38 Rule 5, claiming that the defendants intended to withdraw funds to defeat a potential decree against them.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.892/2021
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Shanoj R, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Joseph Augustin and Lenin Joseph, to prevent them from destroying a sacred serpent grove. The defendants had been allegedly trespassing and causing damage to the grove, which has been in existence for over 1000 years.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.415/2021
Case between Kochuthressia Thomas vs Gopalan, Kalidasan regarding recovery of possession and injunction.
Kochuthressia Thomas is seeking recovery of possession and an injunction against Gopalan and Kalidasan due to an obstruction on a pathway. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants have blocked access to her property, which she purchased and has a right to use as per the sale deed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 30/2023
Case between Louis Anthony vs Nebu @ Chackochan regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.
Louis Anthony, the plaintiff, is seeking a legal remedy for the fixation of boundary and an injunction against the defendant, Nebu @ Chackochan, who is allegedly trying to trespass into the plaintiff's property. The case has raised issues related to property valuation and the right of the plaintiff over the concerned property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 367/2018
Case between Manoharan vs Ramadas regarding mandatory injunction to vacate property
The plaintiff, Manoharan, and the defendant, Ramadas, are brothers involved in a dispute over the ownership and possession of a property in Kadamakkudy Village. The plaintiff seeks a mandatory injunction to vacate the property, claiming that the defendant, who was allowed to reside in a shed on the property, has overstayed and caused disturbances.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 234/2015
Case between Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar vs Suresh P.S, Mallika Shanmughan regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar, is involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, Suresh P.S and Mallika Shanmughan, regarding the fixation of the boundary of his property and preventing the defendants from trespassing. The case arises from allegations of encroachment and unauthorized construction by the defendants on the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 617/2024
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries, is suing the defendant, M/s. Kureekode Agencies, for outstanding payments for electrical and mechanical commodities supplied. The defendant has failed to pay despite acknowledging the bills.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 917/2018
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
The case involves M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries suing M/s. Ambatt Electricals for unpaid dues from supplied commodities. The plaintiff claims the defendant owed them a total amount of Rs. 48,245, which includes interest and legal costs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1467/2019
Case between Sri. Mathew George vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding a civil suit
Sri. Mathew George filed a suit against the Greater Cochin Development Authority. The plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence, leading to the case being dismissed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 647/2022
Case between All Travancore Sri Padmanabha Vilasam Hindu Cheramar Mahajana Sangham vs Salimon K P regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, represented by T M Ramanan, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Salimon K P, who is attempting to act as an office bearer of the All Travancore Sri Padmanabha Vilasam Hindu Cheramar Mahajana Sangham. The court evaluated the claims and evidence presented by both parties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 628/2023
Case between Young Men's Arts & Cultural Association vs K.U.Bhava et al regarding dismissal for default.
The plaintiff, Young Men's Arts & Cultural Association, was not represented during the hearing, while the defendants were present. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won