Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1068/2019

Case between M/s Rajasree Packs vs ISRT Alpha Solutions Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-07-26
Duration
approximately-6 years 7 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s Rajasree Packs, is a partnership firm seeking recovery of money from ISRT Alpha Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and its director, Anil Kumar G, for unpaid dues related to a supply of corrugated boxes. The plaintiff claims an outstanding amount of Rs.1,77,994/- due to dishonoured cheques and subsequent non-payment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff against the first defendant, ISRT Alpha Solutions Pvt. Ltd., ordering them to pay a total of Rs.1,77,994 with interest at 12% per annum. The second defendant, Anil Kumar G, was found not liable.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.1,77,994 with interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved the debt and the failure of the defendants to pay despite being notified.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed on the following terms. 1) 1st defendant shall pay Rs.1,77,994/- along with interest @ 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree...

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Rajasree Packs (Age not specified years) V/818 C, Industrial Development Area, Edayar, Aluva

Defendants

ISRT Alpha Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) 3rd Floor, Technoplaza, Kannadikkadu, Maradu P O, Cochin- 682304 Anil Kumar G (Age not specified years) 3rd Floor, Technoplaza, Kannadikkadu, Maradu P O, Cochin- 682304

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff seeks recovery of Rs.1,77,994/- along with interest.
Evidence:
1st defendant shall pay Rs.1,77,994/- (Rupees One lakh seventy seven thousand nine hundred and ninety four only) along with interest @ 12 % from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Plaintiff claims interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the outstanding balance.
Evidence:
I am not inclined to grant interest as claimed. 1st defendant is directed to pay interest at the rate of 12% per annum.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case plaintiff is entitled for the costs of the proceeding from defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original invoice dated 18.12.2018 issued by the plaintiff to the 1st defendant for Rs.5,46,008/-.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original invoice dated 18.12.2018 issued by the plaintiff to the 1st defendant for Rs.3,64,647/-.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque bearing No.270379 dated 21.01.2019 for Rs.8,10,665/- issued by the defendants to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque return memo dated 20.04.2019 indicating that the cheque was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice dated 11.05.2019 sent on behalf of the plaintiff to the defendants for outstanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipts confirming delivery of the lawyer notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act to support the admissibility of electronic documents.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Wed, 12/18/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases