Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
os. No.20/2018

Case between PEPCO vs P. P Corporation regarding realization of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Judge
Smt. Sirsha NA
Order Date
2024-03-01
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, PEPCO, is seeking to recover money from the defendant, P. P Corporation, for dishonored cheques related to the purchase of tissue papers. The defendant failed to appear in court, leading to a decision in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the amount claimed along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant shall pay ₹2,01,891/- with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of the suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: a) The defendant shall pay ₹2,01,891/- (Rupees Two Lakhs One Thousand Eight Hundred and Ninety One only) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of the suit till realization.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Thomas Yacob (82 years) Cherattumoolayil House, Kokkappilly Kara, Kokkappilly P O., Thiruvaniyoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Defendants

Ajith Kumar (52 years) Mohanvilla, Vazhappilly West P O., Vazhappilly Village, Changanassery Thaluk, Annapoorneswary Road, Changanassery, PIN - 686103

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant shall pay ₹2,01,891/- with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of the suit till realization.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: a) The defendant shall pay ₹2,01,891/- (Rupees Two Lakhs One Thousand Eight Hundred and Ninety One only) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of the suit till realization.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff is not entitled to costs in the suit.
Evidence:
b) The plaintiff is not entitled to costs in the suit, considering the nature of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These cheques were issued by the defendant to the plaintiff and were dishonoured, forming the basis of the plaintiff's claim for recovery.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to Ext.A21
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff was examined as PW1 and provided testimony supporting the claim.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Kolenchery
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases