Similar Cases
Based on: OS 597/2019 — Case between Padminiamma vs Urayma Devaswom Board regarding setting aside ex-parte decree
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
Restoration Petitiion 180/2024
Case between Biju K Mathew vs Sigtech Marketing Private Limited et al regarding restoration petition
Biju K Mathew is the petitioner seeking restoration of a petition. The respondents include Sigtech Marketing Private Limited and Vrinda Rajesh.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
Restoration Petitiion 183/2024
Case between Integrated Finance Company Ltd vs Manoj Muhammed et al regarding Restoration Petition
Integrated Finance Company Ltd is the petitioner seeking a restoration of a previous order. The respondents are Manoj Muhammed and Rehmath Beevi from Kottayam.
Restoration Petition
Restoration Petitiion 167/2024
Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd. vs Anuraj .G. et al regarding Restoration Petition
The case involves Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd. as the petitioner seeking restoration against multiple respondents including Anuraj .G. and others. The petition has been finally heard and the court has issued an order regarding its closure.
Restoration Petition
Restor.Ptn 300146/2024
Case between Allianz Financial Corporation vs Shajikumar et al regarding restoration of petition.
Allianz Financial Corporation is the petitioner represented by Managing partner Ashy Mathew. Shajikumar and Leena U A are the respondents involved in a restoration petition.
Restoration Petition
Restor.Ptn 300011/2025
Case between A.B.Venugopalan Nair vs The Kottayam Wholesale Co.Operative Consumer Stores Ltd regarding Restoration Petition
A.B.Venugopalan Nair is the petitioner and The Kottayam Wholesale Co.Operative Consumer Stores Ltd is the respondent. The case is concerning a restoration petition.
Restoration Petition
Restor.Ptn 300143/2024
Case between The Integrated Finance Co.Ltd vs P.S.Sreekumar et al regarding restoration petition
The Integrated Finance Co.Ltd is involved in a restoration petition. The case includes respondents P.S.Sreekumar and Ashokan M H from Kottayam.
Restoration Petition
Restor.Ptn/300007/2024
Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd vs Firoskhan.V et al regarding restoration of petition.
Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd filed a restoration petition. The petitioner was absent with no representation, leading to the dismissal for default.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
Restor.Ptn/300022/2024
Case between Jishnu G Nair vs Pankajavally P K et al regarding restoration of suit
Jishnu G Nair is the petitioner seeking to restore the suit filed against Pankajavally P K and others. The court decided to restore the suit back to file.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Ptn 9/2024
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Arya Ramabhadran et al regarding dismissal for default.
The petitioner is the Self Employers Service Society represented by Mr. M.V. Josekutty. The respondent includes multiple parties who were involved in the case, and it concerns a default dismissal.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
Restoration Petition 179/2024
Case between Self Employees Service Society vs Satheesh V Maohan et al regarding restoration petition
Self Employees Service Society, represented by M V Josekutty, filed a restoration petition. The petition came up for consideration but the petitioner was not represented and refused to accept the department notice.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
Restor.Ptn 300082/2024
Case between Emergicare Trauma and Life Support Service Pvt. Ltd. et al vs Dr. NTR University of Health Science et al regarding procedural matters.
Emergicare Trauma and Life Support Service Pvt. Ltd. filed a petition against Dr. NTR University of Health Science and its officials regarding a procedural issue. The court addressed the matter under Section 151, Order IX, Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Ptn 20/2024
Case between Boban Jose Elavumkal vs The Metropolitan Archbishop of the Archeparchy of Kottayam et al regarding restoration petition.
Boban Jose Elavumkal filed a restoration petition against The Metropolitan Archbishop of the Archeparchy of Kottayam and The Diaspora Knanaya Catholic Congress. The court has dismissed the petition.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
Restor.Ptn 300067/2023
Case between Plantation Corporation of Kerala Ltd vs Resini et al regarding restoration petition
Plantation Corporation of Kerala Ltd filed a restoration petition. The case involves multiple respondents including Resini, K.I.Sayed Mohammed and Co., and others regarding an order that was set aside.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
OS 506/2013
Case between Thomas Elias vs Abraham Vazhayil Abraham et al regarding impleadment applications in a civil suit.
The case involves Thomas Elias, the original plaintiff, and several defendants including Abraham Vazhayil Abraham, seeking to implead additional parties in an ongoing civil litigation regarding the constitutional amendments of the Knanaya Samudayam. The core contention revolves around the validity and implications of these amendments.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 586/2024
Case between Aymanam Mariathuruthu Vanitha Samajam vs Annamma Punnoose et al regarding declaration and injunction.
Aymanam Mariathuruthu Vanitha Samajam seeks to restrain Annamma Punnoose and others from causing obstruction to the administration of the Samajam. The dispute involves the election of a new governing body and allegations of illegal activities by the respondents.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 439/2025
Case between The Nagambadom Sivagiri Teerthadana Pathayathra Samithy et al vs Raghu P.S et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, including The Nagambadom Sivagiri Teerthadana Pathayathra Samithy and its representatives, are seeking a temporary prohibitory injunction against the defendants from claiming authority over the Samadhi and conducting the Shivagiri pilgrimage. The defendants assert their longstanding role in administration and deny the plaintiffs' claims.
Interlocutory Application
Defendant Won
OS 152/2024
Case between Self Employers Leasing & Finance Ltd vs Mrs. Susan. K. Xavier et al regarding the hearing of the suit.
Self Employers Leasing & Finance Ltd is the plaintiff seeking relief against Mrs. Susan. K. Xavier and others. The suit was finally heard on 17.12.2025.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 272/2016
Case between Thankamma vs Sunny et al regarding Restoration Petition
Thankamma, the plaintiff, is involved in a restoration petition against the defendants Sunny and Rajan regarding an earlier case. The petition was finally heard by the court on June 2, 2025.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
OS 345/2023
Case between Jossy Yoosaf Abraham vs T R Nazeer regarding Restoration Petition.
The case involves a restoration petition filed by Jossy Yoosaf Abraham against T R Nazeer. The petition has been heard and costs were awarded to the respondents.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
OS 111/2014
Case between Vantom Hospitality Pvt Ltd vs Jayamon et al regarding restoration of suit
Vantom Hospitality Pvt Ltd filed a restoration petition to reinstate their suit that was dismissed. The petition was based on the claim that their counsel was unable to attend due to being out of station.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
OS 279/2024
Case between Praveen Kumar et al vs Vijayappan regarding setting aside exparte decree
The case involves a petition filed by the defendant Vijayappan to set aside an exparte decree in OS 279/2024. The petitioner claims he was unable to represent himself due to hospitalization caused by physical torture.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
OS 593/2021
Case between Aliyamma @ Ajitha vs Ajith P Markose et al regarding Restoration Petition
Aliyamma @ Ajitha is the plaintiff seeking to restore the original suit, while Ajith P Markose and others are the defendants. The matter was settled, leading to the petition being allowed.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
OS 240/2023
Case between Joseph Andrews @ M A Baby vs Sunny M A regarding Restoration Petition.
Joseph Andrews @ M A Baby is the plaintiff seeking restoration of a previous case. Sunny M A is the defendant responding to this petition.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
OS 400/2023
Case between N M Mariyamma vs Daisy Thomas regarding Restoration Petition
N M Mariyamma and Daisy Thomas are involved in a Restoration Petition. The court has heard the petition and closed it on the same day.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
Restoration Petition No. 238/2024
Case between Vasudevan Pillai vs Muhammed Haneeffa C et al regarding restoration of a dismissed petition.
The case involves a restoration petition filed by Vasudevan Pillai to restore a previous petition that was dismissed for default. The court considered the arguments from both sides and decided to restore the previous petition in the interest of justice.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No. 372/2019
Case between State Bank of India vs Raj R Nath regarding restoration of ex parte decree
The case involves Raj R Nath, the defendant, who filed a restoration petition to set aside an ex parte decree passed in favor of the State Bank of India, the plaintiff. The defendant argues that his absence was due to job loss and health issues during the pandemic.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 428/2025
Case between David Paul vs M/s. LWC Events LLP et al regarding Restoration of Petition.
David Paul filed a petition to restore a suit that was dismissed. The court dismissed the petition for default due to the petitioner's absence and lack of representation.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 254 /2024
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Future Electricals regarding restoration of the suit.
M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries filed a Restoration Petition to set aside an order and restore the suit. The respondent, M/s. Future Electricals, was represented by one of its partners during the hearing.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
Restoration Petition No. 65/2021
Case between Godwin Fernandez et al vs Kasal India Pvt. Ltd. regarding setting aside an ex-parte decree
The defendants filed a petition seeking to set aside an ex-parte decree issued against them due to their inability to contest the suit because of a serious accident. They claim to have been misled by the plaintiff's representatives into not appearing in court.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 476 /20 22
Case between Geetha Udayan vs M/s. Sakthi Finance Ltd. regarding Restoration Petition
The case involves a restoration petition filed by the defendants against an ex-parte decree. The petitioner was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
O.S. No.633/2022
Case between M/s. Transformer and Equipment Industries vs M/s. Greenee Engineering and Contractors regarding Restoration Petition
M/s. Transformer and Equipment Industries filed a restoration petition to set aside an earlier order and to restore their case. The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's absence.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
O.S.No.1632/2019
Case between Softtouch Readymade, Clothing Pvt. Ltd vs Mar Sleeva Textile regarding setting aside an ex-parte decree
The case involves Softtouch Readymade, Clothing Pvt. Ltd as the plaintiff and Mar Sleeva Textile represented by Jaimon Jacob as the defendant. The defendant seeks to set aside an ex-parte decree issued against them due to non-appearance in court.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1063/2019
Case between Vijayambika vs The Authorised Signatory, Reliance Jio Infratel Pvt, Ltd. regarding restoration of the Original Suit
Vijayambika, the plaintiff, seeks to restore Original Suit No. 1063/2019. The defendant is the Authorised Signatory of Reliance Jio Infratel Pvt, Ltd.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
O.S No. 65/2018
Case between K. Vidyadharan vs R.D.S Realties Ltd. regarding Restoration of suit
K. Vidyadharan, the plaintiff, filed a restoration petition to reinstate a suit dismissed for default against R.D.S Realties Ltd., which involved a request for a prohibitory injunction regarding construction activities causing damage to his property. The petition was heard and ultimately dismissed by the court.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 356/2020
Case between Sarasa.G et al vs Vikraman Unnithan et al regarding Restoration Petition
The case involves a restoration petition filed by the defendants Sarasa.G and Vinu.V.S against the counter petitioners Vikraman Unnithan, Raveendran Unnithan, and Prabha regarding a prior suit. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
RPIA 23/2024
Case between M/s. Imprint Polymers et al vs Canara Bank regarding setting aside exparte decree
The petitioners, M/s. Imprint Polymers and its partners, filed a restoration petition to set aside an exparte decree passed against them. The respondent, Canara Bank, contended that the petitioners had failed to appear despite several opportunities provided.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
E.P. No.23/2020
Case between Balakrishan V vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Balakrishan V is the decree holder and Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd along with its director and his spouse are judgment debtors in this execution petition. The court considered the petition and closed it due to the decree holder's absence.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
E.P.24/2020 in OS No. 248/2018
Case between Rajeevan N vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Rajeevan N is the decree holder and Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. along with its directors are the judgment debtors. This execution petition was considered by the court and subsequently closed due to non-representation by the decree holder.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 25/2020
Case between Reshmitha M vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Reshmitha M is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court found the decree holder absent and closed the execution petition.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 48/2021
Case between Chandrasekharan P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition.
Chandrasekharan P is the petitioner seeking execution against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The execution petition was heard and closed due to the decree holder not being represented.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 49/2021
Case between Chandrasekharan P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Chandrasekharan P is the petitioner and decree holder in an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and others. The court ordered the closure of the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented and defects not being cured.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 50/2021
Case between Renuka P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
Renuka P is the decree holder in this execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The petition was closed as the decree holder was not represented and the defect was not cured.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 53/2021
Case between Ramesh Kumar vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition.
Ramesh Kumar is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The petition was heard and the court closed the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 54/2021
Case between O P Vijayan vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
The case involves O P Vijayan as the petitioner who is seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court closed the execution petition due to the absence of representation from the decree holder.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 65/2021
Case between Vijayalakshmi P K vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Vijayalakshmi P K is the decree holder and has filed an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court closed the execution petition as the decree holder was not represented and no steps were taken.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 67/2020
Case between Rajila V vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition.
Rajila V, represented by Chandrasekharan P, filed an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The decree holder was absent during the hearing.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 69/2020
Case between Raghavan Adoor vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Raghavan Adoor filed an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and others. The court closed the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 96/2020
Case between Balakrishnan V vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Balakrishnan V filed an Execution Petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. and its directors. The case was about the enforcement of a decree, but the decree holder was not represented in court.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won