Case Summary
Vantom Hospitality Pvt Ltd filed a restoration petition to reinstate their suit that was dismissed. The petition was based on the claim that their counsel was unable to attend due to being out of station.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the restoration petition, concluding that the original suit was dismissed not for non-appearance but due to the lack of necessary Commission Report.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed for reasons not related to non-appearance of the plaintiffs and insufficient cooperation to obtain a Commission Report.
The suit was dismissed for reasons not related to non-appearance of the plaintiffs and insufficient cooperation to obtain a Commission Report.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The suit was dismissal for the reason that there was no Commission Report for adjudication. Moreover the plaintiff did not cooperate with the commissioner to get the order executed.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, this petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vantom Hospitality Pvt Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayamon
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Baby Mathew
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Babu Mathew
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Biju Mathew
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Glissando Developers Pvt Ltd
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Georgekutty C A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nithin Sunny Alex
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nithin M K
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- S P Chaly
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A M Philip
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Manu J Varappally
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
This petition cannot be allowed.
Evidence:
As the suit was not dismissed for default for non-appearance of the plaintiff/non-representation of the plaintiff, this petition cannot be allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2014