Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 439/2025

Case between The Nagambadom Sivagiri Teerthadana Pathayathra Samithy et al vs Raghu P.S et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-12-20
Duration
Case Code No.
439
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including The Nagambadom Sivagiri Teerthadana Pathayathra Samithy and its representatives, are seeking a temporary prohibitory injunction against the defendants from claiming authority over the Samadhi and conducting the Shivagiri pilgrimage. The defendants assert their longstanding role in administration and deny the plaintiffs' claims.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The interlocutory application seeking a temporary injunction has been dismissed by the court, indicating that the plaintiffs did not establish a prima facie right to the claim.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Interlocutory Application
Final Judgment
No
The interlocutory application seeking a temporary injunction has been dismissed by the court, indicating that the plaintiffs did not establish a prima facie right to the claim.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to establish a clear prima facie case for the relief sought.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs have not established a clear and undisputed prima facie right.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result the Interlocutory Application is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Nagambadom Sivagiri Teerthadana Pathayathra Samithy
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K. K. Remesh
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.M. Viswanathan
Party Age
83
Relation
Son of
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raghu P.S
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. K. Vijayakumar
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. C. Bilu
Party Age
50
Relation
Son of
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajendra Babu
Party Age
60
Relation
Son of
Plaintiffs Documents
By law of Nagampadom Shivagiri Theerthadana Padayathra Samidi, Pallam; Letter from SNDP yogam Kottayam Union; Order No. A4/881/2024 of SNDP Yogam General Secretary.
Defendants Documents
Letter from SNDP Union Kottayam; Letter from Secretary Pallam Pathayathra Samithi; Copy of Minutes of Padayathra Samithi.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Anil. D. Kartha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. K.M. Santhosh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Temporary prohibitory injunction against defendants from acting as office-bearers.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs have not established a clear and undisputed prima facie right.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: By law
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Governance framework of Nagampadom Shivagiri Theerthadana Padayathra Samidi.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Correspondence from SNDP Yogam Kottayam Union.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Internal decision of SNDP Yogam regarding administrative control.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Correspondence regarding the Padayatra.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: AD card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of dispatch and receipt of correspondence.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Letters
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Communications from SNDP Union Kottayam.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Minutes
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Minutes of Sivagiri theerthadana Padayathra Samithi.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Minutes
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Minutes of SNDP Union Kottayam Union.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Correspondence from SNDP Union Kottayam.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Request for return of the Panchaloha idol.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Minutes
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of Minutes of Padayathra Samithi.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Authorization
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Anumathipathram from Sreenarayana Dharma Sangam Trust.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of complaint to District Police Chief Kottayam.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Receipt from District Police Office Kottayam.
Reference:
Ext.B5(a)
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notice of Nagampadom Sivagiri theerthadana pathayathra Samithi.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Registered Cover
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Series of registered covers.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Rule
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Rule of SNDP Yogam.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Rule
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Rule of SNDP Union.
Reference:
Ext.B9
Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report on physical location and condition of the chariot and idol.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Interlocutory Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Padminiamma vs Urayma Devaswom Board regarding setting aside ex-parte decree
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Self Employers Leasing & Finance Ltd vs Mrs. Susan. K. Xavier et al regarding the hearing of the suit.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Aymanam Mariathuruthu Vanitha Samajam vs Annamma Punnoose et al regarding declaration and injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thomas Elias vs Abraham Vazhayil Abraham et al regarding impleadment applications in a civil suit.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kathiya Umma vs Ahammedukutty regarding declaration of document No. 707/1998 as null and void.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Interlocutory Application Plaintiff Won