Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 586/2024

Case between Aymanam Mariathuruthu Vanitha Samajam vs Annamma Punnoose et al regarding declaration and injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-09-11
Duration
approximately-1 year 11 months
Case Code No.
586
Case Closed
Thu, 09/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Aymanam Mariathuruthu Vanitha Samajam seeks to restrain Annamma Punnoose and others from causing obstruction to the administration of the Samajam. The dispute involves the election of a new governing body and allegations of illegal activities by the respondents.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition is allowed, and the respondents are restrained from causing obstruction to the administration of the Samajam by the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restraint from obstructing the administration of the Samajam
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition is allowed, and the respondents are restrained from causing obstruction to the administration of the Samajam by the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a prima facie case and demonstrated potential irreparable loss if the injunction was not granted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner could establish a prima facie case that new governing body has been formed on 16.10.2024. If the respondents are not restrained from the illegal acts, the petitioner would suffer irreparable loss and injury.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is allowed. The respondents are restrained from causing obstruction to the administration of the Samajam by the petitioner.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aymanam Mariathuruthu Vanitha Samajam
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sindhu P K
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o Late Sunilkumar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Annamma Punnoose
Party Age
75
Relation
W/o Punnoose
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aleyamma K C
Party Age
75
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Michael James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ben Kurian Kuriakose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to the relief as claimed for.
Evidence:
In the result, petition is allowed. The respondents are restrained from causing obstruction to the administration of the Samajam by the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Wed, 10/16/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 09/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Self Employers Leasing & Finance Ltd vs Mrs. Susan. K. Xavier et al regarding the hearing of the suit.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thomas Elias vs Abraham Vazhayil Abraham et al regarding impleadment applications in a civil suit.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Allianz Financial Corporation vs Rajesh V. regarding dismissal of suit
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kumari Anuranjana Anil vs Deputy Director of Education et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abraham Philipose et al vs John Mathyas et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won