Case Summary
Self Employees Service Society, represented by M V Josekutty, filed a restoration petition. The petition came up for consideration but the petitioner was not represented and refused to accept the department notice.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition closed due to the absence of the petitioner who refused to accept the department notice.
Key Reasoning:
Petitioner was not represented and refused to accept the department notice.
Petitioner was not represented and refused to accept the department notice.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner not represented. Respondent represented. Petitioner refused to accept Department Notice.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Petition is closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Self Employees Service Society
- Relation
- represented by M V Josekutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Satheesh V Maohan
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o V C Mohankumar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K N Mohanan
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o Kuttanpillai
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suresh P A
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o Appu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joseph Antony
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o M D Antony
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Leena Krishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Self Employees Service Society vs Satheesh V Maohan et al regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Self Employees Service Society vs Satheesh V Maohan et al regarding restoration petition