Similar Cases
Based on: Restor. 3445/2014 — Case between Moidu vs Vasudevan Nair et al regarding restoration of suit
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
Restor. 99/2018
Case between Kunhutty vs Paarakkal Ramkrishanan @ Balan regarding petition
Petitioner Kunhutty filed a restoration petition against respondent Paarakkal Ramkrishanan @ Balan. The petitioner was allowed the petition on costs of Rs.3000.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Pt 2885/2014
Case between Muhammed Musthafa vs Valappil Kunheemu Umma regarding restoration of suit
Petitioner Muhammed Musthafa filed a petition to restore a suit, which was allowed by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Ptr 227/2015
Case between Moideenkutty vs Alavi et al regarding restoration
Petitioner Moideenkutty filed a suit for restoration that was allowed by the court, with final steps to be completed by a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Restor.P 0226/2015
Case between Unniyam Valappil Khadeeja et al vs Yousef et al regarding restoration
Petitioners filed a suit for restoration which was allowed by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Restor.P 1798/2015
Case between Kuttikrishnan vs Velayudhan et al regarding restoration of suit
Petitioner Kuttikrishnan filed a petition to restore a suit against multiple respondents.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP/116/2016
Case between Sasi vs Anitha T et al regarding Suit Restoration
Sasi filed a suit, and it was restored, leading to the dismissal of the Execution Petition.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1651 OF 2016
Case between Mundi and Chandaran vs Kunhahammed et al regarding restoration of the case
Petitioners filed an application to restore the case, but since the petitioner's counsel had no instructions and the petitioner was absent, the petition was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Restor.] Ptn 1684/2016
Case between Kannachampat Radhakrishan vs Payyapantha Salgunan regarding setting aside exparte order
The petitioner filed a petition to set aside an ex parte order with a delay of 208 days, which was allowed by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Restor.P 2495/2016
Case between Majeed vs Ummer regarding petition for restoration
Petitioner Majeed filed a petition against respondent Ummer for restoration. The court ordered the petition to be allowed on payment of costs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Restor.P 1086/2017
Case between Muhammed Ashraf vs Abdul Latheef regarding non-appearance of respondent
Muhammed Ashraf filed a restoration petition against Abdul Latheef for non-appearance before the court. The court allowed the petition on payment of costs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 157/2016
Case between Mariyamu et al vs Mukthar regarding suit restoration
Mariyamu and others filed a case against Mukthar for restoration of suit, which was dismissed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 3/2017
Case between Abdul Latheef et al vs Indus Motors Company Pvt. Ltd. regarding restoration of RCP
Abdul Latheef and Abdul Hameed filed a case against Indus Motors Company Pvt. Ltd. seeking restoration of RCP. The petition was later dismissed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Restor.] 1347/2017
Case between Yusaf vs Kanara Bank regarding delay in filing petition
Petitioner sought relief from exparte decree due to a genuine reason of missing court date because of a leg injury.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 110/2017
Case between Secratary Perumanna Klalri Service Sahkaran Bank No.F.770 vs Aboobaker,mathapulakkal regarding default enquiry
The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was not present for the inquiry.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 240/2017
Case between Muhammad Shareef et al vs Yunas regarding restoration of suit
The suit was restored, resulting in the closure of the Execution Petition.
Civil Suit
Restor. 2953/2013
Case between P.Kader vs Rayu regarding petition with cost payment condition
Petitioner P.Kader filed a petition in the Court of Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram, seeking relief with the condition to pay Rs.4000 to the respondent by a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Restor. 2097/2014
Case between Rayin vs Kader regarding petition for cost payment
Petitioner Rayin represented by POA Shahira Banu filed a petition against respondent Kader to pay the cost of Rs.4000, which was allowed by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Restor. 2873/2011
Case between Kalamannayil Kunhalavi vs Chenath Shukkoor and Others regarding Unknown
Petitioner Kalamannayil Kunhalavi filed a case against respondents regarding an unspecified matter.
Civil Suit
Restor. 1243/2013
Case between Vylisseri Shamsudheen et al vs Kalluvettikkal Kunhimarakkar et al regarding petition allowance
Three petitioners sought allowance, but the petition was dismissed for failure to deposit the specified cost.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Restor. 1047/2015
Case between Naruparambil Fakrudheen Ali Ahammed vs Kadalayi Hussain, Bushara, and Ahammed Kabeer regarding decree set aside
Petitioner Naruparambil Fakrudheen Ali Ahammed filed a petition to set aside a decree dated 21-02-2015 with the court ruling in favor by allowing the petition.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 4/2013
Case between Subitha Leasing Company Ltd. vs Musthafa regarding Decree
Subitha Leasing Company Ltd. filed a case against Musthafa resulting in a judgment on the decree.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 473/2012
Case between Thennala Service Co-op.Bank vs Mohan et al regarding loan closure
Thennala Service Co-op.Bank filed a case against Mohan, Pratheesh, and Ranjith seeking loan closure, which was closed by endorsement on the notice.
Civil Suit
EP 206/2012
Case between C.S.Nanu et al vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Decree
Four decree holders sued Muhammed Abdul Noor and obtained a judgment in their favor.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 14/2013
Case between South Malabar Gramin Bank vs K.Balakrishnan regarding decree transmission
South Malabar Gramin Bank filed a case against K.Balakrishnan for decree transmission.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2634/2012
Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Petitioner Hamza filed a petition seeking a favorable decision, which was allowed on the condition of paying a cost of RS.1000, later paid.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2477/2012
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Petitioner Mullanmadakkal Mammi filed a petition on medical grounds, which was allowed with the condition of paying costs of Rs. 1000.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 124/2012
Case between Secretary, Niramaruthur Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. vs Mullakkoyamakkanakath Najmudheen et al regarding debt recovery
The Secretary of Niramaruthur Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. filed a case against multiple judgment debtors for debt recovery.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 132/2012
Case between Hamza Haji vs Chakkalakkal Harif et al regarding property delivery
Hamza Haji as the decree holder claimed property delivery against Chakkalakkal Harif and Illikkal Khadeeja, resulting in property delivered and EP closed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2389/2012
Case between Thami et al vs Suresh Babu regarding an order to pay costs
Petition allowed on condition of paying cost of Rs.3000 by petitioner to respondent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2703/2012
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
A petition was allowed on the condition that the petitioner pays costs to the respondent by a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 393/2012
Case between Unniveettil Vinesh vs Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan regarding property delivery
Unniveettil Vinesh filed a case against Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan for property delivery, and the court ordered the property to be delivered.
Civil Suit
EP 348/2011
Case between Kunnathodi Sarada et al vs Puliyakkathodi Kolavan et al regarding delivery of property
Decree holder Kunnathodi Sarada filed a case against several defendants for the delivery of property, which was ultimately granted by the court on 30-07-2013.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 38/2013
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Petition filed by P.Damkumar against multiple judgment debtors was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 298/2011
Case between Secretary,Thennala Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs Vinod et al regarding default of payment
Secretary of Thennala Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. filed a case against Vinod, Subrahmanian, and Abdul Niyad seeking a decree for default of payment.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 273/2011
Case between Malappuram Dist.Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs K.Hussain et al regarding debt repayment
Dispute between Malappuram Dist.Co-op.Bank seeking repayment of debt from K.Hussain and others.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 60/2013
Case between Secretary vs Hamza Poozhithara et al regarding default judgment
The Secretary of Perumanna Klari Service Co-op.Bank filed a petition against Hamza Poozhithara and Muideenkutty Pappal seeking a decree. The petition was dismissed for default due to non-payment of batta and no steps taken.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 313/2012
Case between The Secretary vs Mohammed Kaliyattu Parambil regarding unknown
The Secretary from Valavannur Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. filed a petition against Mohammed Kaliyattu Parambil with no evidence provided leading to dismissal of the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 253/2012
Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Co.Ltd. vs Muhammed Ismail regarding default
Kunnamkulam Financing Co.Ltd. filed a case against Muhammed Ismail, where the petition was dismissed for default as no steps were taken.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 110/2013
Case between Secretary vs Ramadas Unnikkandamveettil et al regarding debt settlement
The Secretary filed a case against Ramadas Unnikkandamveettil and Sudheesh Unnikkandamveettil for debt settlement. The judgment debtor paid the full amount, and the case was closed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 141/2013
Case between Secretary vs Raveendran et al regarding payment dispute
The Secretary of Mangalam Service Co-op.Bank filed a case against Raveendran and Velayudhan regarding a payment dispute.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 214/2013
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Jabir.P.K. regarding maintainability
Kerala Gramin Bank filed a case against Jabir.P.K. seeking a decree, but the case was dismissed as not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 484/2012
Case between The Secretary vs Madathil Mohamed et al regarding petition dismissal
The Secretary filed a petition against Madathil Mohamed and Kizhakkethodi Faizel seeking certain decree. However, the case was dismissed due to lack of evidence regarding respondent's means.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 180/2013
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Muhammed Thameem as the Decree Holder filed a case against Muhammed Abdul Noor. The petition was dismissed for default due to non-production of necessary documents.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP 2684/2012
Case between Cheriya Kallyapurath Muhammed Hashim vs Naduvilaparambil Ali Haji regarding unknown
Petitioner Cheriya Kallyapurath Muhammed Hashim filed a petition against respondent Naduvilaparambil Ali Haji, which was allowed conditionally upon depositing a cost of Rs.10,000 by a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 222/2013
Case between Secretary vs Thekkan Damodaran et al regarding debt payment
A case filed by the Secretary of Purathur Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. against Thekkan Damodaran and Thekkan Prasad for debt payment.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP42/2013
Case between Vineeshkumar et al vs Kumaran regarding compliance with High Court directions
The case involves Vineeshkumar et al seeking compliance with High Court directions from Kumaran, which was closed due to failure to submit affidavit and documents as directed by the High Court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 81/2013
Case between P.Damkumar vs Moideen Koyathinte Purakkal et al regarding petition dismissal
Petition filed by P.Damkumar against multiple judgment debtors was dismissed without any cost as it was not pressed.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
FDA 1282/2011
Case between Koulath et al vs Akbar Ali et al regarding Absence of Instruction
The petition was filed by minors represented by their mother against the respondents. The counsel for the petitioner reported not having instructions from clients, resulting in dismissal of the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won