Case Summary
Petitioners filed a suit for restoration which was allowed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of the suit
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for restoration of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Cost paid. petition stand allowed. Suit is restored as per order in IA 226/15. For steps last chance 23-6-2015.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Unniyam Valappil Khadeeja
- Relation
- Petitioner
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- U.V.Kabeer Mon
- Relation
- Petitioner
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Yousef
- Relation
- Respondent
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nazeera
- Relation
- Respondent
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ummer Farooq
- Relation
- Respondent
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of the suit
Evidence:
Cost paid. petition stand allowed. Suit is restored as per order in IA 226/15. For steps last chance 23-6-2015.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.P
Case Code Year
2015