Case Summary
Petitioner Majeed filed a petition against respondent Ummer for restoration. The court ordered the petition to be allowed on payment of costs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petition Allowed on Payment of Costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the petition to be allowed on payment of costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Costs paid by the petitioner led to the allowance of the petition.
Costs paid by the petitioner led to the allowance of the petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Costs paid by the petitioner led to the allowance of the petition.
Costs paid by the petitioner led to the allowance of the petition.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Counter filed. No delay in filing this application. I am inclined to allow this petition on payment of costs of Rs 3000/-. Make payment of cost on or before 20-06-2017. In default of payment of cost the petition shall stands dismissed. Costs paid. Memo filed. Hence IA closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Majeed
- Party Age
- 45
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ummer
- Party Age
- 36
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition Allowed on Payment of Costs
Evidence:
Counter filed. No delay in filing this application. I am inclined to allow this petition on payment of costs of Rs 3000/-. Make payment of cost on or before 20-06-2017. In default of payment of cost the petition shall stands dismissed. Costs paid. Memo filed. Hence IA closed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.P
Case Code Year
2016