Case Summary
Petitioner Kunhutty filed a restoration petition against respondent Paarakkal Ramkrishanan @ Balan. The petitioner was allowed the petition on costs of Rs.3000.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of petition with costs of Rs.3000
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitioner's restoration petition on payment of costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Counter filed. No documents filed along with petition. The reason stated is not sufficient. But is always desirable to have a disposal on merit. Hence I am inclined to allow this petition on costs of Rs.3000/-.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunhutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Paarakkal Ramkrishanan @ Balan
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- I.V Ratheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Paarakkal Ramkrishanan @ Balan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of Civil Suit
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of petition with costs of Rs.3000
Evidence:
Counter filed. No documents filed along with petition. The reason stated is not sufficient. But is always desirable to have a disposal on merit. Hence I am inclined to allow this petition on costs of Rs.3000/-.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.
Case Code Year
2018