Case Summary
Three petitioners sought allowance, but the petition was dismissed for failure to deposit the specified cost.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of the petition
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as the specified cost was not deposited.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition stands dismissed
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vylisseri Shamsudheen
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kalluvettikkal Mymoona
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kalluvettikkal Rukhiya
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kalluvettikkal Kunhimarakkar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kuthuparakkat Sameera
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Santhoshkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Kalluvettikkal Kunhimarakkar-R1
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Petition allowance
Evidence:
Petition is allowed on condition to deposit cost of Rs.10,000/- on or before 20-1-2014
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Failure to fulfill specified conditions
Case Code
RESTOR.
Case Code Year
2013