Case Summary
The petitioner filed a petition to set aside an ex parte order with a delay of 208 days, which was allowed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Setting aside ex parte order
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the application for setting aside the ex parte order with condonation of a delay of 208 days.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
IA1683/16 allowed. Delay of 208 days is hereby condoned. Hence this application for setting aside exparte order is allowed. IA1683/2016- Costs paid. IA allowed
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kannachampat Radhakrishan
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Payyapantha Salgunan
- Party Age
- 1
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.K.Abdullakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Setting aside ex parte order
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Allow application for setting aside ex parte order with delay condonation
Evidence:
IA1683/16 allowed. Delay of 208 days is hereby condoned. Hence this application for setting aside exparte order is allowed. IA1683/2016- Costs paid. IA allowed
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kannachampat Radhakrishan vs Payyapantha Salgunan regarding setting aside exparte order
Case Code Year
Case between Kannachampat Radhakrishan vs Payyapantha Salgunan regarding setting aside exparte order