Similar Cases
Based on: O. S. No.427/2017 — Case between Rev. Fr. K George Jacob vs Vengola Grama Panchayath regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O.S.No.51/2022
Case between Sreethu P N vs George P M et al regarding temporary injunction for use of a road.
Sreethu P N filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from blocking a local road that has been in use for 50 years. The defendants are accused of obstructing access to the road, affecting the plaintiff's ability to reach their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 922/2021
Case between Lalithamma Radhakrishna Menon vs Cheranellor Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Lalithamma Radhakrishna Menon and her daughter Smitha Radhakrishna Menon, are seeking permanent prohibitory injunction against the Cheranellor Grama Panchayath, claiming that the Grama Panchayath has no authority to maintain a pathway they co-own. The Grama Panchayath contends that the pathway is public and they have the right to maintain it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 314/2021
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs Mohammed Faisal and his wife Shejinamol seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath to prevent construction obstructing their access to a public road. Plaintiffs claim ownership and access rights to their property, while the Panchayath argues it holds valid authority to construct an Anganvadi on the disputed land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 120/2024
Case between Kunhabdulla vs Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
This case involves Kunhabdulla, the plaintiff, who is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali, to prevent them from trespassing onto his property for a road widening project. The defendants allegedly entered the property without consent and marked sections they claimed were necessary for the road work.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 122/2024
Case between RAKHI @ RAGISHA vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Rakhi @ Ragisha and Kamala, seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali and others, who are alleged to have trespassed into their property to mark for road widening without consent. The plaintiffs contest the defendants' claims of rights over their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 124/2024
Case between SURESH vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs SURESH and RAHNA seeking a permanent injunction against defendants VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI, AKHILA MARIYAT, C. K. NAZAR, K. T. K CHANDRAN, NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, and URALUNGAL LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. to restrain them from trespassing and committing acts of waste on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 281/2021
Case between Pathumma vs Beena Subair et al regarding perpetual injunction
Pathumma filed a suit against Beena Subair and Linto Monon P. seeking a perpetual injunction to restrain the defendants from forcefully entering her property. The court found that the defendants had no rights over the property in question.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 138/2022
Case between M.R. Gopinadhan Nair vs Secretary Perumbavoor Municipality regarding perpetual injunction and mandatory injunction
The case involves M.R. Gopinadhan Nair as the plaintiff, who is asking for a perpetual and mandatory injunction against the Secretary of the Perumbavoor Municipality and others regarding unauthorized constructions. The plaintiff claims that the defendants have violated building rules and encroached on his property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.75/2025
Case between Varghese vs State of Kerala et al regarding ownership and possession of property
The petitioner Varghese claims ownership and possession over a property and fears that the respondents are attempting to divert rainwater into his property, which may cause damage. The respondents argue that the water flow into the property is natural and has existed for decades.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 47/2025
Case between Jenin Daniel vs Canara Bank regarding injunction on property possession
Jenin Daniel seeks an injunction against Canara Bank to stop them from taking possession of his property, claiming it is not part of a mortgage. The bank argues that the property in question is secured under a loan agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 300 /2019
Case between Mr. John Peter vs Edakkattuvayal Grama Panchayat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Mr. John Peter filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against Edakkattuvayal Grama Panchayat and others. The matter was settled in mediation, and the terms were accepted by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No. 314 /2021
Case between Mohammed Faisal vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding interim injunction
The case involves petitioners Mohammed Faisal and Shejinamol seeking an interim injunction against the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath to prevent construction on the northern side of their property. The court found the petition barred by res judicata as a similar matter had previously been decided.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No. 314 /2 021
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding approved building plan
The petitioners, Mohammed Faisal and Shejinamol, are seeking relief concerning the construction of a building. The respondent is the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 08 / 2024
Case between Shaji Varghese et al vs Thiruvaniyoor Grama Panchayat et al regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Shaji Varghese and Baby, seek a temporary injunction against the defendants, which include Thiruvaniyoor Grama Panchayat and Ajimon.K.M, to prevent them from trespassing on their property and demolishing a compound wall. The dispute centers on the ownership and boundaries of several plots of land.
Civil Suit
O.S No. 573/2024
Case between Aleyamma M V vs Pambady Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Aleyamma M V and her son Aby Abraham Varghese, filed a suit against Pambady Grama Panchayath to prevent the closure of a road used for access to their property. The case was heard as the defendant did not file a written statement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 804/2019
Case between P K Haridas et al vs The Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit for mandatory injunction.
The plaintiffs, including P K Haridas and Ashalatha, filed a petition to withdraw their suit against the Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath. The suit was regarding a mandatory injunction to demolish a wall, which no longer exists.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.804/2019
Case between P K Haridas et al vs The Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath regarding dismissal of the suit
The plaintiffs, P K Haridas and others, filed a suit against The Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath. The case involved a hearing on the substance of the matter and the court ultimately dismissed the suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
E.A. 124/2025
Case between Malathi vs Government of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case involves petition for execution of decree regarding drainage water and waste reaching the plaintiff's property in violation of a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 976/2024
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Benny John and Reena, sought a temporary injunction against the defendant, Anivrithan, to prevent him from selling a property involved in a disputed sale agreement. The defendant contested the allegations, claiming no such agreement existed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 346/2024
Case between Coconut Grove Residents Association vs Maradu Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The Coconut Grove Residents Association, represented by its Secretary Dr. Stephen Puthumana, filed a suit against Maradu Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the Municipality from interfering with the private road maintained by the Association. The Municipality issued a notice demanding proof of road ownership and threatened to remove a cross bar installed to control unauthorized access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 13/2018
Case between M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. vs V.J. Joy et al regarding perpetual injunction
M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. seeks a perpetual injunction against V.J. Joy and others to prevent them from obstructing the operation of the bone meal unit. The defendants claim that the operation is illegal, causing environmental pollution and health risks to nearby residents.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No.158/2025
Case between Chandran et al vs Sarala Vasu et al regarding ad-interim injunction
The plaintiffs, Chandran, Lakshmi, and Velayudhan M A, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendants, Sarala Vasu, Sudha Surendran, V T Bava, and Fathima Bava, to prevent obstruction of their right of way through a specified pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No.336/2024
Case between Subramanyan et al vs M/s. Manju Industries regarding temporary injunction against operating a metal crusher unit
The petitioners, Subramanyan and others, are seeking a temporary injunction against M/s. Manju Industries to prevent them from operating a metal crusher unit that allegedly causes air and noise pollution. The petitioners claim that the operation of the crusher unit violates environmental regulations and disrupts their quality of life.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1549/2019
Case between Sasi vs Chokli et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Sasi and Soumini, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Chokli, who attempted to obstruct their access to a pathway critical for their property. The case was brought due to concerns over the defendant's attempts to encroach on the pathway, impacting the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of their land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 76/2025
Case between Muhammed Rija P.M vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Muhammed Rija P.M filed a suit against Thrikkakara Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction after the municipality removed a business signboard without proper notice. The court found that while the municipality could not act without due process, it could not impose a blanket prohibition on the municipality's actions.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S. No. 725/2022
Case between Anitha Kumari K.G et al vs Unnikrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Anitha Kumari K.G and Anil Kumar K.G, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the first defendant, Unnikrishnan, related to a goat shed operating unlawfully nearby. They claim the shed has caused severe air and water pollution, affecting their health and living conditions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 436 of 2022
Case between K.J Thomas et al vs Saumya Maju et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
K.J Thomas and others are plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Saumya Maju and others. The case concerns excavation activities by the defendants that threaten the plaintiffs' properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1092/2019
Case between Ajeesh Krishnan et al vs Thuravoor Suresh et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiffs are Ajeesh Krishnan and Haridas T.P, who are members of the Kerala Pulayar Mahasabha (KPMS). They seek a declaration and injunction against the defendants claiming to be the office bearers of KPMS despite being removed due to misconduct.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 349 / 2024
Case between Mokim Ali vs Kochi Municipal Corporation regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Mokim Ali is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Kochi Municipal Corporation. The plaintiff fears illegal eviction from the property they are leasing to conduct a scrap collection business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 545/2024
Case between Soni Francis et al vs Pioneer Nirman India Pvt. (Ltd) et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Soni Francis and Lizzy Francis, claim their right to an exclusive car parking facility in a property owned by them in Pioneer Towers. They have been denied this right by the defendants, who are involved in managing the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 971/2025
Case between Tauseef Kalam et al vs Hussain C.S regarding temporary injunction
The case involves Tauseef Kalam and Asif M. Kalam as plaintiffs and Hussain C.S as the defendant. The plaintiffs are seeking a temporary injunction regarding access to a pathway connected to their property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.462/2021
Case between Kadeeja vs Kunnamagalam Grama Panchayath regarding mandatory injunction
Kadeeja is the plaintiff claiming ownership over a property that the Kunnamagalam Grama Panchayath has converted into a public road. The plaintiff seeks an injunction to remove the construction on her property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 354/2021
Case between Mini vs Puzhakkara Nabeesa et al regarding Mandatory and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Mini, is the owner of a property and seeks to remove obstructions put up by the defendants, Puzhakkara Nabeesa and Subair, to access her property. The case revolves around the existence of a public pathway that has been obstructed by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 19/2018
Case between JASHILNADH. R vs VADAKKAYIL PATHU et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and declaration
Jashilnadh. R is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against VADAKKAYIL PATHU and others, who are accused of attempting to unlawfully construct a retaining wall affecting the plaintiff's property rights. The case centers on the right of way to the plaint A schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.754/2019
Case between Thomas @ Baby et al vs Secretary regarding declaration and injunction.
The plaintiffs, Thomas @ Baby and Mathew, claim to be the absolute owners of properties and are contesting the defendant's action of measuring their private road without legal right. The suit seeks to declare the road as private property and prevent the defendant from taking further action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 682/2017
Case between Jose K Joseph vs Ayarkunnam Grama Panchayath et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Jose K Joseph, the plaintiff, is the owner of a property who seeks to prevent the defendants from constructing a concrete ramp that would block his access. The defendants include the Panchayath and several neighbors who are asserting the right to construct the ramp.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S 36/2019
Case between Aruna D. Pillai et al vs Pradeep Kumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Aruna D. Pillai and Damodaran Pillai, have filed a suit against defendants Pradeep Kumar, Narayanan Nair, and Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding a disputed property where the defendants allegedly attempted to widen a pathway encroaching on the plaintiffs' property. The plaintiffs seek a decree to restrain the defendants from such actions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 206/2024
Case between Philip vs Erumely Grama Panchayath regarding declaration and injunction.
Philip is the plaintiff claiming possessory rights over a property. The case involves an FIR registered against him by the defendant Panchayath regarding the removal of rubber trees from the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 206/2024
Case between Philip vs Erumely Grama Panchayath regarding declaration and injunction.
The plaintiff, Philip, claims possessory rights over a property and seeks an injunction against the Erumely Grama Panchayath, which has allegedly interfered with his rights. The case involves previous ownership documents and claims of adverse possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 13 / 2021
Case between C.V.Peter vs Alias George et al regarding declaration of prescriptive easement and permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves C.V.Peter seeking declaration of prescriptive easement and permanent prohibitory injunction against Alias George and others.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1230/2023
Case between Karthika Pradeep vs Sulthana Habeeb et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs
Plaintiff, a MBBS graduate, runs an educational consultancy firm. Defendants demanded refund for failed transaction and threatened. Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction against threats and trespassing.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 142/2021
Case between Nicolas P Dias et al vs M.K.Aboobacker et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Nicolas P Dias and Mercy Simenthy have filed a case against M.K.Aboobacker and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent obstruction on a road they use. They argue that the defendants unlawfully obstructed necessary gas and water pipeline installations.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.856/2018
Case between Jayan. K.S et al vs M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Jayan. K.S and Jayakumari Jayan, are a husband and wife facing threats from the defendants, M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd and its officers, regarding a loan for a truck. They seek a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from entering their rented house and making threats related to the loan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 835/2025
Case between Biju B.R. vs Sree Narayan Dharma Samajam et al regarding interim injunction to restrain resolution implementation
Biju B.R. has filed a petition for an interim injunction against Sree Narayan Dharma Samajam and its officers. The petitioner claims a resolution allowing male devotees to wear shirts in a temple was passed improperly and seeks to prevent its implementation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 261/2024
Case between Joji Joseph et al vs Sabu N Y et al regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Joji Joseph and Reni Joji, are seeking a temporary injunction against the defendants, Sabu N Y and Varghese, regarding the obstruction of water flow and access to their property. The defendants are accused of illegally constructing a compound wall and obstructing drainage.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 473/2016
Case between Koozhoor Bhagavathi Kshethram represented by Rakesh Venugopal vs Mazhuvannoor Grama Panchayat regarding perpetual injunction
The case involves a dispute over property rights between Koozhoor Bhagavathi Kshethram and Mazhuvannoor Grama Panchayat. The plaintiff is seeking a perpetual injunction to prevent the defendant from forming a new way through the disputed property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 242/2014
Case between Nandakumar A.P. vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory and perpetual injunction
Nandakumar A.P. filed a suit against the State of Kerala and others seeking mandatory and perpetual injunction to remove encroachments on a public way that he claims is essential for accessing his property. The defendants include government officials and a private individual who allegedly encroached on the way.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S. No. 17/2019
Case between Soman vs M.C. Vinayan et al regarding injunction and compensation
Soman filed a suit against M.C. Vinayan and others seeking injunction and compensation for alleged trespass and damage to his property. The court evaluated the claims regarding access to the property and determined the rights over the paths leading to it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won