Case between Chandran et al vs Sarala Vasu et al regarding ad-interim injunction

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Chandran, Lakshmi, and Velayudhan M A, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendants, Sarala Vasu, Sudha Surendran, V T Bava, and Fathima Bava, to prevent obstruction of their right of way through a specified pathway.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court has granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiffs, preventing the defendants from obstructing their right of way through the specified pathway until further orders.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Ad-interim injunction

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

No

The court has granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiffs, preventing the defendants from obstructing their right of way through the specified pathway until further orders.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiffs have made out a prima facie case and any delay in issuance of notice would defeat the purpose of granting the injunction.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

I am satisfied that petitioners have made out a prima facie case and delay in issuance of notice will defeat the purpose of granting injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an ad-interim injunction order is passed restraining the respondents No.1 and 2 and their men and agents from causing any obstruction to the right of way and enjoyment of the petitioners through the injunction schedule pathway.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Chandran
Party Age: 57
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Lakshmi
Party Age: 56
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Velayudhan M A
Party Age: 66
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sarala Vasu
Party Age: 55
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sudha Surendran
Party Age: 60
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: V T Bava
Party Age: 70
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Fathima Bava
Party Age: 64
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Affidavit in support of the petition and the documents produced.

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sreekumar S
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Baby Nandini
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

An ad-interim injunction order is passed restraining the respondents No.1 and 2 and their men and agents from causing any obstruction to the right of way and enjoyment of the petitioners through the injunction schedule pathway.

Evidence:

Hence, an ad-interim injunction order is passed restraining the respondents No.1 and 2 and their men and agents from causing any obstruction to the right of way and enjoyment of the petitioners through the injunction schedule pathway to the plaint A, B and C schedule properties until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification