Case Summary
Plaintiff, a MBBS graduate, runs an educational consultancy firm. Defendants demanded refund for failed transaction and threatened. Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction against threats and trespassing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction, costs of suit
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Plaintiff entitled to permanent prohibitory injunction, costs of suit, and relief from threats and trespassing.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Karthika Pradeep
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- D/o Pradeep C.T
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sulthana Habeeb
- Party Age
- 23
- Relation
- W/o Mahin Noushad
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ashly
- Party Age
- 27
Plaintiffs Documents
Original lease agreement dated 15.03.2023
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Partly Granted
Description:
Restraining defendants from trespassing or causing obstructions
Evidence:
Decree granting permanent prohibitory injunction
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Original lease agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided as evidence for plaintiff's claim
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Copy of agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked as Ext. A3 and A4, but rejected due to lack of foundation for secondary evidence
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Karthika Pradeep vs Sulthana Habeeb et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs
Case Code Year
Case between Karthika Pradeep vs Sulthana Habeeb et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs