Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1092/2019

Case between Ajeesh Krishnan et al vs Thuravoor Suresh et al regarding declaration and injunction

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-06-15
Duration
approximately-4 years 6 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are Ajeesh Krishnan and Haridas T.P, who are members of the Kerala Pulayar Mahasabha (KPMS). They seek a declaration and injunction against the defendants claiming to be the office bearers of KPMS despite being removed due to misconduct.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a decree restraining the defendants from conducting elections in the name of KPMS and from harassing the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs were also awarded costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A decree restraining the defendants from conducting elections in the name of KPMS and a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a decree restraining the defendants from conducting elections in the name of KPMS and from harassing the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs were also awarded costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's case was uncontroverted as no evidence was presented by the defendant to dispute the claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 established his case as pleaded by him. In the absence of any countervailing evidence to contradict this proof...

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit decreed as follows: 1. A decree restraining the defendants No. 1 to 3, their men and agents from conducting the election in the name of KPMS...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajeesh Krishnan
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Haridas T.P
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thuravoor Suresh
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
N.K Neelakandan
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.P Vava
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original bye-law of KPMS, Certified copy of the plaint in OS 235/2018, Certified copy of the written statement of defendant no. 1 in OS 235/2018.
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sherry J. Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renish Raveendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.R. Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.S. Letha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A decree restraining the defendants from conducting the election in the name of KPMS.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit decreed as follows: A decree restraining the defendants No. 1 to 3, their men and agents from conducting the election in the name of KPMS at Tripunithura.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from working as Regional State Committee Office in Tripunithura.
Evidence:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants No. 1 to 3 and their men and agents from working as Regional State Committee Office in Tripunithura.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs are entitled to get costs of suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are entitled to get costs of suit from defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original bye-law of KPMS
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the governing rules of KPMS.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy of the plaint in OS 235/2018
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Referenced to provide context on related litigation.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified copy of the written statement of Defendant No.1 in OS 235/2018
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to outline the defense in related litigation.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certified copy of the state General Body minutes
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrated election of the 1st defendant as General Secretary.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Ajeesh Krishnan et al vs Thuravoor Suresh et al regarding declaration and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ajeesh Krishnan et al vs Thuravoor Suresh et al regarding declaration and injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 06/15/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 06/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 06/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Kerala Pulayar Mahasabha

Similar Cases

Case between K.A. Thankappan vs Kerala Pulayar Mahasabha KPMS et al regarding declaration of Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between P.V. Raju vs Kerala Pulayar Mahasabha KPMS et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sasi vs Chokli et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Coconut Grove Residents Association vs Maradu Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won