Similar Cases
Based on: OS.No.123/2020 — Case between G.Rajesh et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS. 749/2015
Case between Dakshayani, K.C. et al vs State of Kerala regarding reopening the evidence.
This case involves a petition filed by the plaintiffs seeking to reopen evidence. The State of Kerala is the defendant represented by the Secretary of the Revenue Department.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 324/2019
Case between Haris et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, who are children and the wife of late Shamsudeen, claim ownership of certain properties that their father had acquired. They filed this suit against the State of Kerala and its officials, contesting eviction notices served under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP. 90/2025 in OS. No. 586/2017
Case between Jamaludheen vs State of Kerala et al regarding restoration of suit
Jamaludheen filed a petition to restore a previously dismissed suit. The court allowed the petition after noting that the defendant did not file any objection.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 104/2021
Case between Nishini vs State of Kerala et al regarding partition and declaration of civil death
The case involves Nishini, who is seeking a partition of property and a declaration of civil death for her mother and siblings who have been missing since 2002. The defendants include the State of Kerala and a cooperative bank regarding the loans taken by the missing persons.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 107/2023
Case between Thomas Mathew K. vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Thomas Mathew K. filed a suit against the State of Kerala and others seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff contends that the defendants attempted to trespass on his property for road widening without proper consent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.788/2019
Case between Saneer et al vs Sijo Mary regarding discharge of temporary injunction.
The case involves Saneer and Fousiya as additional defendants, seeking to discharge a temporary injunction obtained by the plaintiff, Sijo Mary. The plaintiff claims a right of way over the property owned by the defendants, leading to disputes over property access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 237/2022
Case between Suresh Kumar.S. vs Narayana Pillai et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiffs, Suresh Kumar.S. and Bindu Lekha, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Narayana Pillai and Madhusudhanan Pillai, to prevent them from interfering with the construction of boundary walls on their property. The plaintiffs assert that they are the rightful owners of the property and have faced disturbances from the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.994/2016
Case between Raveendran Pillai et al vs Kerala State et al regarding injunction.
Raveendran Pillai and Beena filed a suit against the Kerala State and other defendants regarding an injunction. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.210/2025
Case between Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple et al vs Biju Panicker et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The petitioners include the Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple and its representatives, who are seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents to prevent them from obstructing the reinstallation of the temple idol. The respondents include members of the temple committee who are alleged to be causing disruptions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 535/2021
Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Yesudasan, filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Jincy, Binu, and an unnamed older defendant. The case arose from disputes over a pathway used by both parties and previous incidents of trespassing and threats by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 535/2021
Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Yesudasan, claims ownership of a property and seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who have allegedly trespassed and threatened him. The defendants express interest in purchasing the property but resort to violence when their demands are not met.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1011/2023
Case between Dileep K J vs Raju et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff Dileep K J is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Raju and his family members, who are allegedly threatening to encroach upon his property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the land and seeks to prevent defendants from trespassing and demolishing his property boundary.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 828/2018
Case between Vishnu vs N. Muthulakshmi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Vishnu filed a suit against N. Muthulakshmi and Ramdas Potty for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants from evicting him from the rented property. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants threatened him to vacate the premises unlawfully.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 166/2023
Case between Adv.V.Vinayachandran et al vs Gayathri Devi regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, three advocates, are tenants of rooms owned by the defendant and are seeking to prevent eviction due to a rent hike. They claim that the defendant's actions threaten their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 815/2023
Case between Sadasivan vs Shiju regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Sadasivan, filed a suit against the defendant, Shiju, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendant from obstructing the pathway on his property. The case revolves around the plaintiff's right to use the B schedule pathway for agricultural purposes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 284/2023
Case between Sasikumar vs Ushadevarajan, Thankamani Vijayan regarding permanent prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Sasikumar, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Ushadevarajan and Thankamani Vijayan, who are allegedly attempting to encroach upon his property. The defendants have also obstructed the reconstruction of a compound wall.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 976/2023
Case between Emilin Binoy et al vs Thresya Fernandes @ Tresa Albert et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Emilin Binoy, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Thresya Fernandes and Jannet, who are attempting to illegally encroach on her property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property and has faced threats and harassment from the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 304/2022
Case between Karmali vs Charles regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Karmali, the absolute owner of a property, filed a suit against the defendant Charles for obstructing access to her property. The defendant allegedly began blocking the only pathway leading to the plaintiff's property, claiming ownership of an adjacent area.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 470/2024
Case between Soman Pillai vs Radhakrishna Pillai regarding temporary injunction.
Soman Pillai filed a petition against Radhakrishna Pillai for a temporary injunction concerning a property dispute. The plaintiff claims the defendant encroached on his property and caused damage.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 753/2024
Case between Sankaran Nampoothiri vs Kollam Muncipal Corporation regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Sankaran Nampoothiri is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Kollam Muncipal Corporation. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant is planning to trespass and demolish boundary walls of his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 704/2018
Case between Ansad et al vs Jameela Beevi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Ansad and Nabeesath, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Jameela Beevi and Nadirsha, to prevent them from interfering with a pathway they have been using for access to their properties. The defendants deny the existence of the pathway and claim it belongs solely to them.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 615/2025
Case between Kiran Krishna vs S.D. Ajith Kumar regarding Temporary Injunction
Kiran Krishna, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against S.D. Ajith Kumar, the defendant, who cancelled her booking for a wedding reception at a temple auditorium. The case revolves around the plaintiff's efforts to secure the venue for her marriage reception scheduled for January 3, 2026.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 807/2024
Case between G. Haridasan Potty vs Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
G. Haridasan Potty filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom after the defendants aimed to obstruct his daily rituals at the temple. The case centers around the plaintiff's rights to perform rituals at the temple without interference.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 342/2022
Case between Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple et al vs Bhasuran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple and its Secretary Ganesh.T, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Bhasuran and Selvakumar. The case revolves around the defendants creating disturbances and attempting to encroach upon the temple property, which is managed by the new committee elected after the defendants were removed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 601/2020
Case between Reghu. K et al vs Rengan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Reghu. K, Ratheesh. K, and Omana, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Rengan, Ponnamma, and Radhika Rengan, to prevent them from encroaching on a pathway critical to accessing their property. The court examined claims of ownership and usage rights between the parties regarding the D schedule pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 601/2024
Case between Nazimudheen vs Shahul Hameed et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Nazimudheen filed a suit against the defendants for permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain them from trespassing into his property. The plaintiff claimed he is the absolute owner and has been facing attempts of trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 453/2020
Case between Nazeeb vs Nizamudheen regarding injunction
The case involves a suit filed by Nazeeb against Nizamudheen over illegal construction. The plaintiff claims that the defendant began unauthorized construction that violated the Kerala Panchayath Raj Act.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.930/2016
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
The case involves T.Unnikrishna Pillai as the defendant and Sajeev as the plaintiff. The defendant filed applications to set aside an exparte decree issued for the realization of money.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.502/2020
Case between Piyoos vs Sheemol regarding setting aside the order in RP.No.259/2024
Piyoos, aged 44 years, has filed this petition to set aside an earlier order and restore the RP on file. The respondent, Sheemol, aged 50 years, is involved in this matter.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.777/2016
Case between Parukutti Amma et al vs Abdul Rahim regarding restoration of suit.
The case involves a petition filed by Rema, the second plaintiff, to restore a suit originally filed by her deceased mother, Parukutti Amma. The respondent, Abdul Rahim, did not appear in court despite being served notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 785/2013
Case between Babu Chandhar et al vs Sarada Chandhatty et al regarding Partition.
Babu Chandhar, represented by his wife and attorney Syamala, filed a petition for a final decree for partition involving his mother and siblings. The case pertains to the division of property as per a preliminary decree originally issued in 2018.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.536/2015
Case between Satheesh et al vs Ajayan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Satheesh and Sudhila, filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence on a scheduled hearing date.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 459/2022
Case between Sudhakaran vs Thiruvithamcore Devaswam Board et al regarding restoration of IA. 266/24
The petitioner, Sudhakaran, filed an application to restore IA. 266/24 on file to set aside an ex-parte decree in the original suit. The court found that no objections were filed by the respondents and granted the request for restoration.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 557/2022
Case between Giriraj Kabra vs Harikrishnan Sasidharan regarding review of order
This case involves Giriraj Kabra petitioning to review a previous order regarding his suit. The respondent, Harikrishnan Sasidharan, was absent during the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 375/2018
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Stanly John et al regarding restoration of EP.
The case involves a petition for restoration of a money realization EP that was dismissed for default. The decree holder is Canara Bank and the judgment debtors are Stanly John and John Christopher.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 575/2023
Case between M.Satheesan vs Premarajan et al regarding restoration of suit.
M.Satheesan, aged 64, filed a petition to restore a suit. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of fresh steps taken by the respondents.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 267/2024
Case between The Canara Bank vs Nisha Sebastian et al regarding Realisation of Money
The Canara Bank filed a suit against Nisha Sebastian and others for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendants, associated as a Joint Liability Group, defaulted on their loan repayment, leading the plaintiff to seek legal relief.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 607/2024
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs A.Saeed regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, filed a suit against the defendant, A.Saeed, for the recovery of a loan amount that was not repaid. The defendant had taken a loan of Rs. 75,000 but failed to make the repayments despite legal notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 897/2023
Case between Manoj vs Suresh Kumar regarding Injunction
The plaintiffs, Manoj and Chinnu Venugopal, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants, Suresh Kumar and Jayasree, from trespassing on their property and creating a pathway through it. The case revolves around property ownership and the peaceful possession of the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.299/2019
Case between Vijayan Pillai vs Vikraman Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree
Vikraman Pillai, the defendant, seeks to set aside an exparte decree issued against him in favor of his brother Vijayan Pillai, the plaintiff, concerning a disputed promissory note. The defendant claims he was unable to contest the decree due to health issues.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.665/2019
Case between Shylesh vs Sabu Surendran regarding restoration of suit
Shylesh, the Managing Partner of Evergreen Financiers, filed a petition to restore the suit on file. The respondent, Sabu Surendran, was absent during the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 323/2023
Case between State Bank of India, Keralapuram Branch vs Deepu.S.S regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, State Bank of India, seeks recovery of money from the defendant, Deepu.S.S, who had taken personal loans and failed to repay. The defendant did not appear in court, resulting in a decision made based on the plaintiff's evidence.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 423/2021
Case between M/s.Canara Bank vs Remya.S regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, M/s. Canara Bank, filed a suit against the defendant, Remya.S, for the recovery of money due to a loan default. The defendant had taken a loan but failed to make the required repayments.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 255/2024
Case between Ansari.A. vs Mujeeb regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, Ansari.A., is seeking to recover a loan amount of Rs.3,28,083/- from the defendant, Mujeeb, who failed to repay the borrowed amount. The case revolves around the defendant's obligation to repay the loan with interest, as agreed upon in a promissory note.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.759/2024
Case between M/s. A.R.Wood Industries Pvt. Ltd vs A.Siyad et al regarding Realisation of Money
M/s. A.R.Wood Industries Pvt. Ltd filed a suit against A.Siyad and Shemina for the non-payment of an outstanding amount of Rs.7,26,031/-, which remained due despite multiple agreements and cheques issued. The defendants did not appear in court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 743/2019
Case between Salman Faris vs The South Indian Bank Ltd et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
The case involves Salman Faris as the petitioner challenging an exparte decree against him. The respondents include The South Indian Bank Ltd and two family members of the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 607/2023
Case between Aniraj. T vs M/s.Inno Instrument Pvt Ltd regarding Recovery of Money
Aniraj. T, proprietor of C.P. Enterprises, filed a suit against M/s.Inno Instrument Pvt Ltd for recovery of an amount due after the defendant unilaterally terminated their agreement. The plaintiff claims to have returned the goods and sought compensation but was met with inaction from the defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 354/2017
Case between Rajesh vs Sarada et al regarding Final Decree for Partition
The case involves petitioners Rajesh and Dhanya seeking a final decree for partition of a property. The court has accepted the commission report for the partition.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won