Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.930/2016

Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
approximately-8 years 4 months
Case Code No.
930
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves T.Unnikrishna Pillai as the defendant and Sajeev as the plaintiff. The defendant filed applications to set aside an exparte decree issued for the realization of money.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed both IA 01/2023 and RP 132/2023 due to insufficient reasons for the delay in filing to set aside the exparte decree.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed both IA 01/2023 and RP 132/2023 due to insufficient reasons for the delay in filing to set aside the exparte decree.
Key Reasoning:
The petition to condone the delay was dismissed due to lack of sufficient explanation for the 769-day delay.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition to condone the delay was dismissed due to lack of sufficient explanation for the 769-day delay.
Supporting Evidence
There is absolutely no materials before the Court to show that the petitioner was prevented from filing the petition to set aside the exparte decree in time.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 01/2023 and RP 132/2023 are dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajeev
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.Unnikrishna Pillai
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.Vraj Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N.Kesavakurup
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Petition to condone the delay of 769 days in filing application to set aside exparte decree
Evidence:
Delay is not at all explained. Hence the petition for condoning the delay is only to be dismissed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Petition to set aside the exparte decree dated 13/08/2021
Evidence:
In view of my finding on point No.1, this point does not germane for consideration.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2016

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Fri, 10/07/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Karthikeyan vs M.K. Alexander regarding review petition and condonation of delay.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anand Vijay vs Vimal Kumar regarding condonation of delay in filing RP.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Stanly John et al regarding restoration of EP.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Parukutti Amma et al vs Abdul Rahim regarding restoration of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Piyoos vs Sheemol regarding setting aside the order in RP.No.259/2024
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won