Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 623/2020

Case between Karthikeyan vs M.K. Alexander regarding review petition and condonation of delay.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-12-19
Duration
approximately-1 year 8 months
Case Code No.
623
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Karthikeyan filed a suit against M.K. Alexander for recovering an amount of Rs. 9,43,150/-. The suit was rejected due to non-payment of court fees, and Karthikeyan sought to review this order.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed both the review petition and the application for condonation of delay filed by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed both the review petition and the application for condonation of delay filed by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
The review petition was found to be not maintainable and the delay in filing was not satisfactorily explained.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
There is absolutely no materials before the court to show that the petitioner was prevented from filing the petition to review the order dated 27/03/2024 in time.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 01/2025 and RP 82/2025 are dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Karthikeyan
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.K. Alexander
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suba S.Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
John George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Application for condoning the delay of 384 days in filing the review petition.
Evidence:
Hence, IA 01/2025 for condoning the delay is to be dismissed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Review petition to restore the suit rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
In view of the finding on point No.1, this point does not germane for consideration.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Fri, 03/27/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Anand Vijay vs Vimal Kumar regarding condonation of delay in filing RP.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Stanly John et al regarding restoration of EP.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Parukutti Amma et al vs Abdul Rahim regarding restoration of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Piyoos vs Sheemol regarding setting aside the order in RP.No.259/2024
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won