Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.299/2019

Case between Vijayan Pillai vs Vikraman Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
approximately-5 years 3 months
Case Code No.
299
Case Closed
Fri, 04/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vikraman Pillai, the defendant, seeks to set aside an exparte decree issued against him in favor of his brother Vijayan Pillai, the plaintiff, concerning a disputed promissory note. The defendant claims he was unable to contest the decree due to health issues.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The applications IA 01/2024 and RP 132/2024 filed by Vikraman Pillai to set aside the exparte decree were dismissed by the court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The applications IA 01/2024 and RP 132/2024 filed by Vikraman Pillai to set aside the exparte decree were dismissed by the court.
Key Reasoning:
Delay not adequately explained; no evidence was provided to justify the delay in filing the application.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
There is absolutely no materials before the Court to show that the petitioner was prevented from filing the petition to set aside the exparte decree in time.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 01/2024 and RP 132/2024 are dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijayan Pillai
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vikraman Pillai
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Chirakkarathazham S.Suresh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Petition for condoning the delay of 467 days in filing the petition to set aside the exparte decree.
Evidence:
Delay is not at all explained. Hence the petition for condoning the delay is only to be dismissed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Petition to set aside the exparte decree.
Evidence:
In view of my finding on point No.1, this point does not germane for consideration.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Thu, 07/11/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 04/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Satheesh et al vs Ajayan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Babu Chandhar et al vs Sarada Chandhatty et al regarding Partition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Parukutti Amma et al vs Abdul Rahim regarding restoration of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Piyoos vs Sheemol regarding setting aside the order in RP.No.259/2024
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won