Similar Cases
Based on: OS. No. 753/2024 — Case between Sankaran Nampoothiri vs Kollam Muncipal Corporation regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS. No. 316/2019
Case between Kollam Municipal Corporation vs Rajesh et al regarding mandatory injunction.
The case involves the Kollam Municipal Corporation as the plaintiff and Rajesh along with others as defendants, focusing on a mandatory injunction. The plaintiff failed to comply with court orders, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 346/2024
Case between Coconut Grove Residents Association vs Maradu Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The Coconut Grove Residents Association, represented by its Secretary Dr. Stephen Puthumana, filed a suit against Maradu Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the Municipality from interfering with the private road maintained by the Association. The Municipality issued a notice demanding proof of road ownership and threatened to remove a cross bar installed to control unauthorized access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 725/2022
Case between Anitha Kumari K.G et al vs Unnikrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Anitha Kumari K.G and Anil Kumar K.G, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the first defendant, Unnikrishnan, related to a goat shed operating unlawfully nearby. They claim the shed has caused severe air and water pollution, affecting their health and living conditions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 349 / 2024
Case between Mokim Ali vs Kochi Municipal Corporation regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Mokim Ali is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Kochi Municipal Corporation. The plaintiff fears illegal eviction from the property they are leasing to conduct a scrap collection business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 288/2023
Case between Saju vs Varkala Municipality et al regarding granting a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
Saju is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Varkala Municipality and its officials, claiming they are attempting to illegally close down his hotel business. The case involves disputes over the operation of the hotel and alleged influence from the property's previous owner, Mr. Mohankumar.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.472/2019
Case between Raju George vs Kottayam Municipality et al regarding injunction and other incidental reliefs.
Raju George filed a suit against Kottayam Municipality and P.R.Suresh Babu seeking to prevent the construction of a waste disposal plant on his property. The plaintiff claimed that the construction would obstruct his access and cause health hazards.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 327/2025
Case between T M Saseendran et al vs Kottayam Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs are autorickshaw drivers who sought a court order to stop unauthorized business activities obstructing their parking space. They claimed that the Kottayam Municipality failed to act against these illegal activities despite complaints.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.788/2019
Case between Saneer et al vs Sijo Mary regarding discharge of temporary injunction.
The case involves Saneer and Fousiya as additional defendants, seeking to discharge a temporary injunction obtained by the plaintiff, Sijo Mary. The plaintiff claims a right of way over the property owned by the defendants, leading to disputes over property access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 237/2022
Case between Suresh Kumar.S. vs Narayana Pillai et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiffs, Suresh Kumar.S. and Bindu Lekha, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Narayana Pillai and Madhusudhanan Pillai, to prevent them from interfering with the construction of boundary walls on their property. The plaintiffs assert that they are the rightful owners of the property and have faced disturbances from the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.994/2016
Case between Raveendran Pillai et al vs Kerala State et al regarding injunction.
Raveendran Pillai and Beena filed a suit against the Kerala State and other defendants regarding an injunction. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.210/2025
Case between Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple et al vs Biju Panicker et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The petitioners include the Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple and its representatives, who are seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents to prevent them from obstructing the reinstallation of the temple idol. The respondents include members of the temple committee who are alleged to be causing disruptions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 535/2021
Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Yesudasan, filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Jincy, Binu, and an unnamed older defendant. The case arose from disputes over a pathway used by both parties and previous incidents of trespassing and threats by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 535/2021
Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Yesudasan, claims ownership of a property and seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who have allegedly trespassed and threatened him. The defendants express interest in purchasing the property but resort to violence when their demands are not met.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1011/2023
Case between Dileep K J vs Raju et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff Dileep K J is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Raju and his family members, who are allegedly threatening to encroach upon his property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the land and seeks to prevent defendants from trespassing and demolishing his property boundary.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 828/2018
Case between Vishnu vs N. Muthulakshmi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Vishnu filed a suit against N. Muthulakshmi and Ramdas Potty for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants from evicting him from the rented property. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants threatened him to vacate the premises unlawfully.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 166/2023
Case between Adv.V.Vinayachandran et al vs Gayathri Devi regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, three advocates, are tenants of rooms owned by the defendant and are seeking to prevent eviction due to a rent hike. They claim that the defendant's actions threaten their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 815/2023
Case between Sadasivan vs Shiju regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Sadasivan, filed a suit against the defendant, Shiju, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendant from obstructing the pathway on his property. The case revolves around the plaintiff's right to use the B schedule pathway for agricultural purposes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 284/2023
Case between Sasikumar vs Ushadevarajan, Thankamani Vijayan regarding permanent prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Sasikumar, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Ushadevarajan and Thankamani Vijayan, who are allegedly attempting to encroach upon his property. The defendants have also obstructed the reconstruction of a compound wall.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 976/2023
Case between Emilin Binoy et al vs Thresya Fernandes @ Tresa Albert et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Emilin Binoy, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Thresya Fernandes and Jannet, who are attempting to illegally encroach on her property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property and has faced threats and harassment from the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 304/2022
Case between Karmali vs Charles regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Karmali, the absolute owner of a property, filed a suit against the defendant Charles for obstructing access to her property. The defendant allegedly began blocking the only pathway leading to the plaintiff's property, claiming ownership of an adjacent area.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 470/2024
Case between Soman Pillai vs Radhakrishna Pillai regarding temporary injunction.
Soman Pillai filed a petition against Radhakrishna Pillai for a temporary injunction concerning a property dispute. The plaintiff claims the defendant encroached on his property and caused damage.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 704/2018
Case between Ansad et al vs Jameela Beevi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Ansad and Nabeesath, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Jameela Beevi and Nadirsha, to prevent them from interfering with a pathway they have been using for access to their properties. The defendants deny the existence of the pathway and claim it belongs solely to them.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 615/2025
Case between Kiran Krishna vs S.D. Ajith Kumar regarding Temporary Injunction
Kiran Krishna, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against S.D. Ajith Kumar, the defendant, who cancelled her booking for a wedding reception at a temple auditorium. The case revolves around the plaintiff's efforts to secure the venue for her marriage reception scheduled for January 3, 2026.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 807/2024
Case between G. Haridasan Potty vs Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
G. Haridasan Potty filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom after the defendants aimed to obstruct his daily rituals at the temple. The case centers around the plaintiff's rights to perform rituals at the temple without interference.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.123/2020
Case between G.Rajesh et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding injunction.
The plaintiffs, G.Rajesh and T. Jayasree, filed a suit for injunction against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 342/2022
Case between Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple et al vs Bhasuran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple and its Secretary Ganesh.T, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Bhasuran and Selvakumar. The case revolves around the defendants creating disturbances and attempting to encroach upon the temple property, which is managed by the new committee elected after the defendants were removed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 601/2020
Case between Reghu. K et al vs Rengan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Reghu. K, Ratheesh. K, and Omana, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Rengan, Ponnamma, and Radhika Rengan, to restrain them from encroaching upon a pathway claimed by the plaintiffs. The defendants contend that the pathway is their property and deny the plaintiffs' right to use it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 194/2022
Case between Richard Hentry vs Nickolas Joseph et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Richard Hentry, the plaintiff, claims ownership and possession of a property from which he seeks protection against the defendants, his neighbors, who he alleges are attempting to trespass. The defendants are also his business partners.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 14/2025
Case between Sugathan vs Shyama et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Sugathan claims ownership of property and seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants for trespassing and damaging his property. The defendants, including Shyama and others, have allegedly attempted to widen a pathway and have caused damage to the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 601/2024
Case between Nazimudheen vs Shahul Hameed et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Nazimudheen filed a suit against the defendants for permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain them from trespassing into his property. The plaintiff claimed he is the absolute owner and has been facing attempts of trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 453/2020
Case between Nazeeb vs Nizamudheen regarding injunction
The case involves a suit filed by Nazeeb against Nizamudheen over illegal construction. The plaintiff claims that the defendant began unauthorized construction that violated the Kerala Panchayath Raj Act.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 278 OF 2015
Case between P. Yahutty haji vs Tirur Municipality et al regarding partition.
P. Yahutty haji filed a suit for partition against Tirur Municipality and Siddeeq. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. .1531/2019
Case between Jobin Thomas vs Thrikkakara Municipality et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Jobin Thomas, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Thrikkakara Municipality and Abdul Razak P.K. The case revolves around unauthorized demolition of property boundaries and potential construction disputes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 13 OF 2016
Case between Koonathil Pathummu Umma et al vs Thanikkatt Muhammed et al regarding injunction and compensation
Koonathil Pathummu Umma and Thanikkatt Muhammedali are plaintiffs claiming that their basement was unlawfully demolished by the defendants including the Triprangode Grama Panchayat and its Secretary. The defendants argue that the plaintiffs encroached onto public property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1305/2020
Case between A.S Mohanan vs Lakshmi et al regarding settlement of the suit
A.S Mohanan and Dhanalakshmi are the plaintiffs, while Lakshmi, Mani, Surendran, Latha, and Santhosh are the defendants. The case is about a suit that was settled through mediation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1265/2020
Case between Aleyamma Varghese vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding non-prosecution of suit
Aleyamma Varghese filed a suit against Thrikkakara Municipality. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 1320/2016
Case between M.K.Crown vs Thrikkakara Muncipality et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiff, M.K.Crown, claims ownership of certain property and is seeking a declaration and injunction against the defendants, including Thrikkakara Muncipality, who issued directives affecting his property rights. The defendants argue that the property in question is a public pathway and seek dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S No. 201/2018
Case between Mani P.R @ Maniappan et al vs Kalamassery Municipality et al regarding dismissal for default
The plaintiffs include Mani P.R @ Maniappan and others who filed a suit against Kalamassery Municipality and the State of Kerala. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their counsel.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 145/2017
Case between Sajeevan vs Ratheesh et al regarding mandatory and temporary prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sajeevan, is seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants for alleged violations of the Kerala Municipality Building Rules regarding construction. The defendants include Ratheesh and the Corporation of Kochi, who argued that the suit is not maintainable under the Kerala Municipality Act.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 347/2019
Case between Sivaraman Menon vs Maradu Municipality regarding injunction for advertisement boards
The plaintiffs, Sivaraman Menon and Junaid, seek a permanent injunction against Maradu Municipality to prevent the removal of advertisement boards installed on their property. The Municipality alleges the boards are unauthorized and illegal, claiming the plaintiffs failed to comply with tax regulations.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 974/2024
Case between Rajesh V. Thomas et al vs Thrikkakara Municipality et al regarding dismissal of suit
The plaintiffs, Rajesh V. Thomas, Thomas V.V, and Daisy Thomas, filed a suit against the Thrikkakara Municipality and other government officials. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1605/2022
Case between Ravikrishnan N.R vs Secretary, Alappuzha Municipality regarding a civil suit
Ravikrishnan N.R filed a suit against the Secretary and Alappuzha Municipality. The court ruled that the plaint is rejected due to a lack of remitted court fees.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No. 516/2023
Case between M/s Palm World Manufacturing Unit vs The Secretary, Muncipal Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram regarding suit dismissal for default
M/s Palm World Manufacturing Unit represented by Ajith Kumar.K filed a suit against The Secretary, Municipal Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram and The Chairman, Kelpalm Facility Centre. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.509/2016
Case between K. Somasekhara Pillai vs Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, K. Somasekhara Pillai, is involved in a dispute over property rights with the defendants, including the Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram. He claims they unlawfully entered his property and cut down coconut trees, leading to a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.760/2024
Case between Sandeep. N vs Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation et al regarding withdrawal of suit
Sandeep. N is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation and others. The plaintiff has withdrawn from the suit without liberty to file a fresh suit on the same matter.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.318/2021
Case between Kerala Muncipal Corporation Workers and Employees Congress vs N.Sreekantan, Mukunda Devan Nair et al regarding dismissal of suit.
The plaintiff, Kerala Muncipal Corporation Workers and Employees Congress, was absent during the proceedings. The defendants were present, and as there was no representation from the plaintiff, the court decided to dismiss the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 540/2024
Case between T.Valsarajan vs Ramanattukara Municipality et al regarding realization of money
The plaintiff, T.Valsarajan, claims ownership of land and a building and seeks unpaid rent from the defendants, who have been using the property without compensation. The defendants did not respond to legal notices regarding the overdue rent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 154/2020
Case between M. K. Vineesh vs Kozhikode Municipal Corporation et al regarding dismissal for default.
M. K. Vineesh is the plaintiff in this case against Kozhikode Municipal Corporation and the Executive Engineer, Urban Planning Department. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was not represented in court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won